Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant tounder §240.14a-12

 

The Allstate Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
  (5) Total fee paid:
         

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
  (3) Filing Party:
         
  (4) Date Filed:
         

Table of Contents

     

The Allstate Corporation
2775 Sanders Road, Northbrook, IL 60062
April 7, 2014


 


 




 

April 10, 2013






To Our Stockholders,

 

 

 

 


Allstate's strong resultsAllstate had a very good year in 2012 demonstrate2013. This was the effectivenessresult of a multi-year plan to reposition our business in the face of the strategiesfinancial market turmoil and operational changes puta dramatic increase in place over the last five years to adapt to increased severe weather low interest rates, global financial instability,events, both of which began in 2008. During this period, we built on our strong history of business leadership by making a number of enhancements to corporate governance and changing customer requirements. We appreciatestockholder communication. Allstate has a team of directors with diverse capabilities that is forward-looking, responsive, and focused on creating stockholder value. In 2013, the confidence shareholders have hadBoard continued our practice of continuous improvement in the companystrategic oversight, governance, and want to recognize 38,000 Allstate employees, more than 9,300 Allstate agencies, and our senior leadership team for a job well done.executive compensation.

 

 

 

 

STRATEGIC OVERSIGHT
 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Allstate's strategy of delivering differentiated value propositions to the four customer segments in the insurance market is working, as the company is growing and earning attractive returns. Management is focused on executing this strategy while building important capabilities to drive future growth, such as broadening customer relationships and improving customer connectivity. We repositioned the property-liability investment portfolio, lowering financial exposure to interest rates. In 2013, we also announced the sale of Lincoln Benefit Life to strategically focus Allstate Financial and redeploy capital to earn higher risk-adjusted returns.

 

 

 

 


Corporate governance is one of our board's most important areas of focus. We maintain an interactive dialogue with stockholders and governance organizations on key issues. Our chairman, Tom Wilson, met with proxy advisory firms and with investors representing more than a third of outstanding shares in 2012. Their feedback on many issues was reviewed by the relevant board committees. The results of their deliberations on certain of the key issues are as follows:GOVERNANCE
 

   

We maintain communication throughout the year with major stockholders on governance issues and use stockholder surveys and other information to ensure we have a complete and balanced understanding of governance issues that apply to Allstate. This year, we further expanded this process by asking each Board leadership structure. Our shift from a rotatingcommittee to a traditional lead director role in 2011 enhanced board effectiveness,review relevant feedback and we're pleased with how H. John Riley, Jr. developed the role in its first year. We determined it would be in the best interests of Allstate and its stockholders for Mr. Riley to continue shaping the role as lead director for andetermine if additional year past his normal board retirement, which would otherwise occur in May 2013.

discussion or action is necessary.

Limits on board service. Our nominating and governance committee formalized a policy to limit the number of boards on which our directors may serve. You should expect us to continue to devote the time necessary to serve Allstate at an exemplary level. Directors who are active executives are limited to two public company boards and other directors are limited to five public company boards, in addition to Allstate in each case. This is in line with current corporate governance best practices. Our full policy is stated in ourCorporate Governance Guidelines.

Director experience. We reviewed concerns about service by Allstate directors on the boards of companies going through difficult times. We agreed that, in each individual case, the director capabilities were enhanced by dealing with the challenges facing these companies.

Board tenure limits. We chose not to replace our retirement age policy with board tenure limits.


GRAPHIC

Social responsibility. Allstate has been recognized for its commitment to corporate citizenship. We considered whether to expand our strong social and environmental policies and reporting practices and chose to continue with the annual report format initiated in 2012, which includes expenditures and the board's oversight role. Support for a proposal at last year's annual meeting to expand the report was relatively low at 9.96%.


Table of Contents



 

 

 



Board Capabilities






We believe thatalso enhanced our capabilities to oversee the Board's most critical roles are strategic oversight, corporate governance, stockholder advocacy,company's risk and leadership. Allreturn practices by creating a risk and return committee of the directors have strong skillsBoard. The entire Board remains fully involved in risk and return principles, practices, and results, as this is tightly linked to strategy for an insurance company, and consequently conducts a formal review every six months. We added the Board committee to ensure sufficient expertise and continuity between these four areas based on their considerable professional experience and career successes. In addition, each director has unique expertise that enhancesreviews. This also enables the board's abilityaudit committee to oversee Allstate's long-term success. Our collective expertise is based on each director's experience in operating businesses, working in relevant industries, serving in financial management roles, or overseeing executive compensation and succession planning. We invite youdevote additional resources to review our individual biographies on pages 9-20. We further enhanced our board's capabilities by recruiting Kermit Crawford, Presidentmonitoring cybersecurity initiatives. The chairs of the Walgreen Company pharmacy business,audit and Herbert Henkel, former Chairmanrisk and CEOreturn committees are members of Ingersoll-Rand Company.both committees to ensure integration at the Board level.






Executive Compensation






The nominating and governance committee has expanded and formalized Board evaluation practices. Individual director evaluations are conducted annually by the lead director, chair of the nominating and governance committee, and the chairman. We made several changesalso reviewed the concept of Board tenure to Allstate's executive compensation program for 2012, which are detailed inensure we maintain appropriate independence and perspective while ensuring the compensation discussion and analysis on pages 25-39. We would like to highlight the following changes:

Performance stock awards. We replaced time-based restricted stock awards with performance stock awards (PSAs). PSAs are earned upon achievement of future return on equity targets as outlined on pages 32-34.

CEO Compensation. Mr. Wilson's target compensation was below the benchmark 50th percentile for the last several years. Based on improved business results, his continued tenure and experience as Allstate's CEO, and an independent compensation consultant's review of market and industry data, we increased Mr. Wilson's incentive compensation targets. The changes place Mr. Wilson's total target direct compensation opportunity at approximately the 50th percentile of our compensation peer group. The performance-based incentive compensation design requires strong corporate performance before Mr. Wilson's actual compensation increases. See pages 34-35 for more details on the adjustments to Mr. Wilson's compensation.continuity


 

 

 

 

 

STRATEGY AND BUSINESS RESULTS






Allstate's strategy of providing differentiated products and services to the four consumer segments of the insurance market is working. The Property-Liability combined ratio improved from 2011 and as a result net income rose to $2.3 billion in 2012 from $787 million in 2011. The 2011 Esurance acquisition has rewarded Allstate with unit growth of 31% in the self-directed, brand-sensitive consumer segment. The investment portfolio generated a return of 7.3% despite the low interest rate environment. Return on equity increased 7.6 points to 11.9% in 2012, benefiting from good weather, continued strong auto profitability, and improved returns in the homeowners business. These results have been recognized by the market, giving Allstate stockholders a total return of 50% in 2012 and 44% over the past three years.



GRAPHIC




Finally, we wish to extend our gratitude to Joshua Smith and Jim Farrell for their 16 and 14 years, respectively, of outstanding service as Allstate directors. Their considerable expertise in strategy, board governance, and leadership development provided great insights in overseeing Allstate's strategy and performance. We wish them all the best in retirement.

The Allstate board is fully committed to fulfilling its fiduciary obligations to all stockholders. We are steadfast in our belief that Allstate's current business strategy will reward your continued support.

The Allstate Board of Directors


Table of Contents

     
 
GRAPHIC
   THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
2775 Sanders Road
Northbrook, Illinois 60062-6127

April 10, 2013

Notice of 2013 Annual Meetingnecessary for directors to evaluate management's performance in executing multi-year strategies. An established retirement age for directors creates an upper limit on Board tenure and Proxy Statementhistorically has led to sufficient turnover so that average director nominee tenure is 71/2 years. Our lead director or chairman also now meets every two years with each Board member to discuss their future plans so that individual circumstances are appropriately addressed.

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Following a number of significant changes to executive compensation practices in 2012 and solid stockholder support of the say-on-pay proposal in 2013, we have focused on market-based changes to executive compensation programs. We reduced the maximum cash incentive pool funding for senior management from 250% of target to 200%. We made this change in 2012 for CEO compensation, so this change will align other executive officers with this structure in 2014. Management also revised certain employee benefit programs, which increased book value per share in 2013 and reduces future costs. The changes are estimated to substantially reduce the CEO's future pension benefits.




 

Dear Stockholder:

Allstate'sWe have modified equity retention requirements for senior management to provide for greater alignment between compensation and stockholder returns and to be responsive to a 2013 stockholder proposal that received 32% support. Stock ownership requirements have been six times annual meetingsalary for the CEO and three times annual salary for other senior executives. Before reaching these goals, senior management must retain 75% of stockholders willthe net proceeds from any equity award. These requirements and a management culture that is very stockholder-focused have resulted in good alignment between management and stockholders. The CEO currently holds common stock valued at 20 times salary, which has been accumulated over 19 years. Despite these strong practices and results, we added an additional equity retention requirement for senior executives who receive both performance stock awards and options, so that 75% of the net proceeds must be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. (CDT) at our officesfor an additional year past the three-year vesting period in Northbrook, Illinois. Your vote on the issues being considered at this meeting is important to Allstate's continued success. This proxy statement containscase of performance stock awards, or in the information you will need to makecase of options for an informed decision on the election of directors and five governance proposals.additional year after exercised.

 

 

 

 


Your vote is important. Please vote as soon as possible by telephone, Internet, or mail, even if you plan to attend the meeting.BOARD COMPOSITION








Sincerely,









GRAPHICGRAPHIC
   Thomas J. Wilson
Chairman, President

We thank John Riley, our lead director, for his insightful and Chief Executive Officer

balanced approach to Board governance over the last 16 years. We are particularly grateful for John's willingness to extend his role for a year past normal retirement to help create an effective and efficient lead director model. We also thank Ron LeMay for his strategic oversight and technology expertise during 14 years of service on our Board. We are enthusiastic about the addition of Bobby Mehta, who brings additional financial services and technology experience to our collective capabilities.

The Allstate Board is fully committed to fulfilling its fiduciary duty to stockholders by being proactive and focused on stockholder returns. We thank you for your continued support.




GRAPHICThe Allstate Board of Directors








Table of Contents

Notice of Annual Meeting

1

Proxy and Voting Information

2

Corporate Governance Practices

4

Board Meetings and Committees

4

Nomination Process for Board Election

6

Proposal 1. Election of Directors

8

Director Biographies

9

Board Leadership Structure and Practices

20

Communication with the Board

22

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

22

Related Person Transactions

22

Nominee Independence Determinations

22

Proposal 2. Say-on-Pay: Advisory Vote on the Executive Compensation of the Named Executives

23

Executive Compensation

24

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

24

Executive Compensation — Design

25

Executive Compensation — Earned Awards

34

Compensation Committee Report

40

Executive Compensation — Tables

41

Executive Compensation — Performance Measures

58

Director Compensation

60

Security Ownership

63

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

64

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

65

Proposal 3. Approval of the Material Terms of the Annual Executive Incentive Plan

66

Proposal 4. Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountant

69

Audit Committee Report

70

Other Items

Stockholder Proposals

71

Counting of Votes for Stockholder Proposals

76

Stockholder Proposals for the 2015 Annual Meeting

76

Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan Participants

77

Proxy Statement and Annual Report Delivery

77

Procedures for Attending the Annual Meeting in Person

78

Proxy Solicitation

78

Appendices

Appendix A — Categorical Standards of Independence

A-1

Appendix B — The Allstate Corporation Annual Executive Incentive Plan

B-1

Appendix C — Policy Regarding Pre-Approval of Independent Registered Public Accountant's Services

C-1

Appendix D — List of Executive Officers

D-1

Appendix E — Definitions of Non-GAAP Measures

E-1

Table of Contents

Notice of Annual Meeting
PROXY STATEMENT

Notice of 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


When: Tuesday, May 21, 2013,20, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. Registration begins at 10:00 a.m.


Where:


 


West Plaza Auditorium
Allstate
3100 Sanders Road
Northbrook, Illinois 60062


Items of Business:


 


1.


 


To elect to the BoardElection of Directors the 12 director nominees named in this proxy statement to serve until the 2014 annual meeting.directors.

 

 

2.

 

To provide anSay-on-pay: advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.executives.

 

 

3.

 

To approve the 2013 equityApproval of material terms of annual executive incentive plan.

 

 

4.

 

To ratify theRatification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Allstate's independent registered public accountant for 2013.2014.

 

 

5.

 

To consider a stockholderStockholder proposal on equity retention by senior executives, if properly presented.

 

 

6.

 

To consider a stockholderStockholder proposal on reporting lobbying expenditures, if properly presented.



7.


Stockholder proposal on reporting political expenditures, if properly presented.

 

 

In addition, any other business properly presented may be acted upon at the meeting.


Who Can Vote:


 


Holders of Allstate stock at the close of business on March 22, 2013.21, 2014.


Attending the Meeting:


 


Stockholders who wish to attend the meeting in person should review the instructionsdetails on page 80.78.


Date of Mailing:



 



On April 7, 2014, Allstate began mailing its Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy statement and annual report, and proxy card/voting instruction form to stockholders and to participants in its Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan on April 10, 2013.Plan.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on May 21, 2013.20, 2014. The Notice of 20132014 Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, and 20122013 Annual Report and the means to vote by Internet are available at www.proxyvote.com.

  By Order of the Board,

 

 


GRAPHICLOGO
  Mary J. McGinnSusan L. Lees
Secretary

 

 

April 10, 20137, 2014

Table of Contents1  |  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents

Proxy and Voting Information

1

Corporate Governance Practices

3

Board meetings and committees

3

Nomination process for Board election

5

Proposal 1. Election of Directors

8

Director biographies

9

Board leadership structure

21

Board role in risk oversight

21

Board role in management succession

21

Board role in setting compensation

21

Management participation in committee meetings

22

Board attendance policy

23

Communication with the Board

23

Compensation committee interlocks and insider participation

23

Related person transactions

23

Nominee independence determinations

23

Proposal 2. Advisory vote on the executive compensation of the named executives

24

Executive Compensation

25

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

25

Compensation Committee Report

39

Compensation Tables

40

Director Compensation

58

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

60

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

61

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

61

Proposal 3. Approval of 2013 equity incentive plan

62

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

72

Proposal 4. Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountant

73

Audit Committee Report

74

Other Items

Stockholder proposals

75

Stockholder proposals for the 2014 annual meeting

78

Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan participants

79

Proxy statement and annual report delivery

79

Procedures for attending the annual meeting in person

80

Proxy Solicitation

80

Appendices

Appendix A — Categorical Standards of Independence

A-1

Appendix B — The Allstate Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan

B-1

Appendix C — Policy regarding Pre-Approval of Independent Registered Public Accountant's Services

C-1

Appendix D — List of Executive Officers

D-1

Table of Contents

  
PROXY STATEMENT
    
 



Proxy and Voting Information


PROXY STATEMENT


  

       
   
       
  WHO IS ASKING FOR YOUR VOTE AND WHY   The annual meeting will be held only if there is a quorum, which means that a majority of the outstanding common stock entitled to vote is represented at the meeting by proxy or in person. To ensure there will be a quorum, the Allstate Board of Directors asks you to votecomplete and submit a proxy card or voting instruction form before the meeting, which allows your Allstate stock to be represented at the annual meeting by the proxies named on the proxy card/voting instruction form.
       

 

 

WHO CAN VOTE

 

 

 

You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 22, 2013.21, 2014. On that date, there were 468,014,179446,210,529 Allstate common shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
       


 


 


HOW TO VOTE


 


 


 


If you hold shares in your own name as a registered stockholder, you may vote in person by attending the annual meeting, or you may instruct the proxies how to vote your shares by following the instructions on the proxy card/voting instruction form.If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please see the instructionsdetails on page 80.78.

If you hold shares in street name (that is, through a broker, bank, or other record holder), you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank, or other record holder to vote your shares. If you hold shares through the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan, see the instructions on page 79.77.

Before your shares have been voted at the annual meeting by the proxies, you may change or revoke your votevoting instructions by votingproviding instructions again by telephone, by Internet, in writing, or, if you are a registered stockholder, by voting in person at the annual meeting.

Abstentions are counted for quorum purposes.
       

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY OF VOTES

 

 

 

All proxies, ballots, and tabulations that identify the vote of a particular stockholder are confidential, except as necessary to allow the inspector of election to certify the voting results or to meet certain legal requirements. A representative of American Election Services, LLC will act as the inspector of election and will count the votes. The representative is independent of Allstate and its directors, officers, and employees.



GRAPHIC




If you write a comment on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or ballot, it may be provided to our secretary along with your name and address. Your comments will be provided without reference to your vote, unless the vote is mentioned in your comment or unless disclosure of the vote is necessary to understand your comment. At our request, the distribution agent or the solicitation agent maywill provide us with periodic status reports on the aggregate vote. These status reports may include a list of stockholders who have not voted and breakdowns of vote totals by different types of stockholders, as long as we are not able to determine how a particular stockholder voted.
DISCRETIONARY
VOTING AUTHORITY
OF PROXIES



GRAPHIC
If you complete and submit a signed proxy card/voting instruction form to allow your shares to be represented at the annual meeting, but do not indicate how your shares should be voted on one or more proposals, then the proxies will vote your shares as the Board of Directors recommends on those proposals. Other than the proposals listed on page 3, we do not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies may vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.
     

1  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  2


Table of Contents


Providing voting instructions, discretionary voting authority of proxiesVoting Instructions

You may instruct the proxies to vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" each proposal, or you may instruct the proxies to "ABSTAIN" from voting. Each share of our common stock outstanding on the record date will be entitled to one vote on each of the 1211 director nominees and one vote on each other proposal. A description of how votes are counted is included with each proposal.


Proposal
 Board
Recommendation

 Rationale for Board
Recommendation

 
1. Election of directorsdirectors. FORGRAPHIC Talented

Broad and diverse slate of nominees bringing the full complementdirectors.

Highly successful executives with relevant skills.

Balanced tenure with 10 of director skills to serve Allstate.11
independent of management.

 
2. Approve compensationSay-on-pay.
 — advisoryAdvisory vote to approveon the executive compensation of the named executives.*
 FORGRAPHIC Executive

Strong oversight by compensation program designed to align payand succession committee.

Excellent 2013 business results.

Enhanced alignment with performance.stockholders through expanded equity retention requirements for senior executives beginning with 2014 awards.

 
3. Approve equity plan — vote to approve an equityApproval of material terms of annual executive incentive plan. FORGRAPHIC Plan provides a reasonable approach

Well-structured market-based program.

Administered by an independent committee.

Designed to equity incentive compensation awards.preserve financial benefits of section 162(m) tax deduction.

 
4. Ratification of auditorsauditors. — ratification
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Allstate's independent registered public accountant for 2013.2014.*
 FORGRAPHIC Auditor remains independent and fees continue to be reasonable.

Independent with few ancilliary services.

Reasonable fee.

 
5. Stockholder proposal — stockholder proposal on equity retention by senior executives.* AGAINSTGRAPHIC Allstate already has robust

Existing stock ownership guidelines for senior executives that include a retention requirement of 75% of net after-tax shares acquired throughrequire significant equity compensation up to requiredownership.

Named executives' equity holdings exceed stock ownership guidelines.

Retention guidelines were expanded for all prospective grants beginning in 2014.

 
6. Stockholder proposal — stockholder proposal on reporting lobbying expenditures.* AGAINSTGRAPHIC 

Board oversees and reviews public policy initiatives.

Allstate already provides significant transparency through public policy report.

Less than 10% of shares voted supported a summary reportsimilar proposal in 2013.

7.Stockholder proposal on reporting political expenditures.*GRAPHIC

Board oversees and reviews public policy initiatives.

Allstate already provides significant transparency through public policy report.

Less than 10% of political contributions, lobbying expenditures, and payments to associations.shares voted supported a similar proposal in 2013.

 
* Advisory/Non-Binding Proposal    

Abstentions are counted for quorum purposes. If you return a signed proxy card/voting instruction form to allow your shares to be represented at the annual meeting, but do not indicate how your shares should be voted on one or more proposals listed above, then the proxies will vote your shares as the Board of Directors recommends on those proposals. Other than the proposals listed above, we do not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies may vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

3  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  2


Table of Contents

  



Corporate Governance Practices


PROXY STATEMENT
    

 

Corporate Governance Practices  


Corporate Governance Practices

Allstate has a history of strong corporate governance. By evolving our governance as governance "best practices" are a critical component toapproach in light of best practices, our success in drivingBoard drives sustained stockholder value. Over the years, our Board of Directors has evolved our practices tovalue and best serveserves the interests of Allstate stockholders, including:stockholders.

ü Annual election of all directors.

ü

 

Majority vote standard in uncontested elections. Each director must be elected by a majority of votes cast, not a plurality.

ü

 

No stockholder rights plan ("poison pill").

ü

 

No supermajority voting provisions.

ü

 

Confidential voting.

ü

 

Stockholders holding 10% or more of our outstanding stock have the right to call a special meeting.

ü

 

Stockholders holding 10% or more of our outstanding stock have the right to request action by written consent.

ü

 

Stockholder engagement. Allstate regularly engages with its stockholders to better understand their perspectives.
GRAPHIC
Board committees review and assess stockholder feedback to determine whether action is necessary.
üIndependent Board. Our Board is comprised of independent directors, except our CEO.

ü


Independent lead director.

ü


Independent Board committees. Each committee other than the executive committee is made up of independent directors. Each committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board.
GRAPHIC
Formation of a risk and return committee.
üFormal director evaluation process. Each year, the lead director, chairman of the Board, and chair of the nominating and governance committee evaluate each director.
GRAPHIC
Formalized and expanded processes to enhance cross-committee and Board communication.
üRegular Board self-evaluation process. The Board and each committee evaluates its performance at the end of each in-person meeting.
GRAPHIC
Expanded the committee reports provided to Board.
üAuthority to retain independent advisors by each committee.

ü

 

Annual report on corporate involvement with public policy. The report provides transparency on Allstate initiatives to promote sound public policy in areas such as teen safe driving and can be found at www.allstate.com/publicpolicyreport.

ü


Independent Board. Our Board is comprised of all independent directors, except our CEO.

ü


Regular Board self-evaluation process. The Board and each committee evaluates its performance at the end of each in-person meeting.

ü


Independent lead director.

ü


Independent Board committees. Each of the audit, compensation and succession, and nominating and governance committees is made up of independent directors. Each standing committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board.

ü


Each of the audit, compensation and succession, and nominating and governance committees has the authority to retain independent advisors.

ü

 

Robust code of ethics. Allstate is committed to operating its business with the highest level of ethical conduct and has adopted aCode of Ethics that applies to all employees, including the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the controller, and other senior financial and executive officers, as well as the Board of Directors. Allstate'sCode of Ethics is available at www.allstatecodeofethics.com.

üGRAPHIC

 

StockAllstate received a top ethics score (out of over 150 companies) on the Integrity Index employee survey conducted by CEB RiskClarity.
GRAPHIC
Expanded equity retention requirements for senior executives above stock ownership guidelines for executives and directors.guidelines. Significant requirements strongly link the interests of the Board and management with those of stockholders.

You can learn more about our corporate governance by visiting www.allstateinvestors.com, where you will find ourCorporate Governance Guidelines, each standing committee charter, ourCode of Ethics, andDirector Independence Standards. Each of these itemsdocuments also is available in print upon request made to the Office of the Secretary, The Allstate Corporation, 2775 Sanders Road, Suite A2W,F7, Northbrook, Illinois 60062-6127.


Board Meetings and Committees

The Board held eight meetings during 2012.2013. Currently, the Board has fourfive standing committees: audit, compensation and succession, executive, and nominating and governance.governance, and risk and return. The following table identifies each standing committee, its members, functions, and number of meetings held during 2012.2013. The Board has determined the members of the audit, compensation and succession, and nominating and governance, and risk and return committees are independent within the meaning of applicable laws, NYSE listing standards, and theDirector Independence Standards in effect at the time of determination.

3  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  4


Table of Contents


 
 Key Responsibilities
 Meetings
in 20122013

 Directors
 Committee
Report

 
The Allstate Corporation
Board of Directors
 

Strategic Oversight

oversight

Corporate Governance

governance

Stockholder Advocacy

advocacy

Leadership

 8 Chair: Thomas J. Wilson

10 of 11 Independent directorsnominees are independent.

 NoneAnnual
letter to
stockholders

 

 

 


Audit
Committee

Assists the Board in its oversight of the integrity of financial statements and other financial information including reviews of Allstate's financial statements; system of internal control over accounting and financial reporting and disclosures; enterprise risk control assessment and guidelines and policies by which risk assessment and management is governed; ethics; and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Appoints, retains, and oversees the work of the independent registered public accountant, and with the Board, evaluates its qualifications, performance, and independence.

Evaluates Allstate's internal audit function through semi-annual reviews of its audit plan, policies and procedures, resources, risk assessment methodologies and significant findings.

8Chair: Judith A. Sprieser

F. Duane Ackerman

Robert D. Beyer

Kermit R. Crawford

Mary Alice Taylor

The Board determined that Ms. Sprieser, Mrs. Taylor, and Messrs. Ackerman and Beyer are each individually qualified as an audit committee financial expert. Messrs. Greenberg, Henkel, Mehta, and Rowe have the background and experience to qualify as audit committee financial experts but do not currently serve on the audit committee.

Page 70





Compensation
and
Succession
Committee

Assists the Board in determining the compensation of the executive officers, including the CEO.

Reviews management succession plans and executive organizational structure for Allstate and each significant operating subsidiary.

Administers Allstate's executive compensation plans and has sole authority to retain the committee's independent compensation consultant.

7Chair: Jack M. Greenberg

Herbert L. Henkel

Andrea Redmond

John W. Rowe

Page 40





Nominating
and
Governance
Committee

 

Recommends candidates to be nominated by the Board for election as directors.

Reviews theCorporate Governance Guidelines and advises the Board on corporate governance issues.

Determines performance criteria and oversees assessment of the Board's performance and director independence.

 

6

 Chair: F. Duane Ackerman

W. James Farrell

Kermit R. Crawford

Andrea Redmond

H. John Riley, Jr.

John W. Rowe

Joshua I. Smith

Judith A. Sprieser

Mary Alice Taylor

 

None




Audit
Committee(1)

 

Appoints, oversees, approves the fees of, and evaluates the independence of the independent registered public accountant.

Reviews Allstate's financial statements and recommends to the Board whether the audited financial statements should be included in Allstate's annual report on Form 10-K.

Reviews Allstate's accounting principles and practices affecting the financial statements.

Discusses risk assessment and risk management processes with management.

Oversees Allstate's ethics and compliance program; periodically reviews and approves itsCode of Ethics.

 

9

Chair: Judith A. Sprieser

F. Duane Ackerman

Robert D. Beyer

Jack M. Greenberg

Ronald T. LeMay

Mary Alice Taylor

Financial Experts(2):

Judith A. Sprieser

Jack M. Greenberg

Page 74




CompensationGRAPHIC
Risk and
SuccessionReturn
Committee

 

Assists the Board in determining the compensation of the CEOrisk and other executive officers.

Administers Allstate's executive compensation plansreturn governance and has sole authority to retain the committee's independent compensation consultant.

oversight.

Reviews risk and return process, policies, and guidelines used to evaluate, monitor, and manage enterprise risk and return.

Supports the audit committee in its oversight of risk controls and management succession plans and executive organizational structure for Allstate and each significant operating subsidiary.policies.

 

9

3
 Chair: W. James Farrell

Robert D. Beyer

Robert D. Beyer

Jack M. Greenberg

Herbert L. Henkel

Ronald T. LeMay

Andrea Redmond

H. John Riley,  Jr.

John W. Rowe

Joshua I. Smith
Judith A. Sprieser

 

Page 39

None

 

 

 


Executive
Committee

 

Has the powers of the Board in the management of Allstate's business affairs to the extent permitted under the bylaws, excluding any powers granted by the Board to any other committee of the Board.

 

0(1)

 Chair: Thomas J. Wilson

F. Duane Ackerman

W. James Farrell

Robert D. Beyer

Jack M. Greenberg

H. John Riley, Jr.

Judith A. Sprieser

 

None


(1)   Separately established in accordance withIn 2013, there was no need for the requirements of Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2)   The Board determined that Ms. Sprieser and Mr. Greenberg are each individually qualified as an auditexecutive committee financial expert, as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 407(d)(5) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and each is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE.to meet.

5  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  4


Table of Contents


Nomination Process for Board Election

The Board is continually engaged in identifyingcontinuously identifies potential director candidates to anticipatein anticipation of retirements, resignations, or the need for expanded capabilities. The graphic and bullets below describe the ongoing nominating and governance committee process to identify highly qualified candidates for Board service.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Board nominees are identified through a retained search firm, suggestions from current directors and stockholders, and other solicitations, including self nominations.self-nominations. Our newest directors, Messrs. Crawford and Henkel, weredirector Mr. Mehta was identified by our retained search firm and by an existing Board member, respectively.member.

The nominating and governance committee discusses the desired skills and perspectives. Directors evaluate all candidates for diversity of background, expertise, and perspective, as well as the criteria described in ourCorporate Governance Guidelines on allstate.com.

Following this initial screening, management conducts deeper inquiries to determine whether there are any existing or potential business conflicts with the candidate or any business entity affiliated with that candidate.

Based on these results, the committee decides which candidates warrant further consideration.

Certain directors are designated to meet with each candidate. At the same time, both the search firm and management conduct additional research and analysis.

Conclusions from due diligence and impressions from meetings are discussed by the committee. If all interactions and research results are positive, the committee recommends that the Board elect the candidate.


5  --  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents

An invitation to join the Board may be extended by the Board, the nominating and governance committee. The committee chair, or the chairman ofrecommends candidates for election to the Board.

The Board ultimately is responsible for naming nominees for election or appointing nominees to serve until election at the next annual meeting. Over the last two years, we have considered about 40 potential candidates. As a result, we have added three highly qualified directors in Messrs. Crawford, Henkel, and Rowe.

The Board and nominating and governance committee believe that each director should based on his or her professional experiences, be well-versed in

The Allstate Corporation  |  6


Table of Contents

strategic oversight, corporate governance, stockholder advocacy, and leadership in order to be an effective member of the Allstate Board. In addition to this fundamental expertise, the Board and committee seek directors with corporate operating experience, relevant industry experience, financial expertise, and/or compensation and succession experience. The Board and committee also look for a balance of retired former executives and executives who are actively engaged in operating a business. The image below depicts the overall skill set required to be an effective Allstate director as well as additional capabilities of our current Board.

GRAPHIC

The Board and committee expect each non-employee director to be free of interests or affiliations that could give rise to a biased approach to directorship responsibilities or a conflict of interest, and free of any significant relationship with Allstate that would interfere with the director's exercise of independent judgment. The Board and committee also expect each director to act in a manner consistent with a director's fiduciary duties of loyalty and care. All nominees for election must comply with the applicable requirements of Allstate's bylaws, which are posted on allstate.com. Allstate executive officers may not serve on boards of other corporations whose executive officers serve on Allstate's Board.

The Allstate Corporation  --  
6


Table of ContentsCandidates Nominated by Stockholders

The nominating and governance committee will consider director candidates recommended by a stockholder in the same manner as all other candidates recommended by other sources. A stockholder may recommend a candidate at any time of the year by writing to the Office of the Secretary, The Allstate Corporation, 2775 Sanders Road, Suite A2W,F7, Northbrook, Illinois 60062-6127. A stockholder also may directly nominate someone for election as a director at a stockholders' meeting. Under our bylaws, a stockholder may nominate a candidate at the 20142015 annual meeting of stockholders by providing advance notice to Allstate that is received by the Office of the Secretary no earlier than the close of business on January 21, 2014,20, 2015, and no later than February 20, 2014.19, 2015. The notice must be sent to the Office of the Secretary, The Allstate Corporation, 2775 Sanders Road, Suite A2W,F7, Northbrook, Illinois 60062-6127 and must meet the requirements set forth in the corporation's bylaws. A copy of the bylaws is available from the Office of the Secretary upon request or can be accessedfound on the Corporate Governance portionsection of allstate.com.

7  --|  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents

  
PROXY STATEMENT
    
 



Proposal 1 — Election of Directors


PROXY STATEMENT


  

   

Election of Directors
GRAPHIC Management ProposalsThe Board recommends that you vote for all director nominees.

Broad and diverse slate of directors.

Highly successful executives with relevant skills.

Balanced tenure with 10 of 11 independent of management.
 



Proposal 1
Election of Directors

The Board recommends 1211 nominees for election to the Allstate Board for one-year terms beginning in May 2013.2014. This is a talented slate of nominees, both individually and as a team. They bring a full complement of business and leadership skills to their oversight responsibilities. Half have been public company CEOs and most nominees serve on other public company boards, enabling best practices from other companies to be adapted to serve Allstate. Their diversity of experience and expertise facilitates robust and thoughtful decision-making on Allstate's Board.

Each nominee, other than Messrs. Crawford and Henkel,Mr. Mehta, was previously was elected at Allstate's annual meeting of stockholders on May 22, 2012,21, 2013, and has served continuously since then. Mr. CrawfordMehta was elected by the Board effective January 30, 2013. Mr. Henkel was elected by the Board effective March 1, 2013.February 18, 2014. The terms of all directors expire at the annual meeting in May 2013.2014. The Board expects all nominees named in this proxy statement to be available for election. If any nominee is not available, then the proxies may vote for a substitute. On the following pages, we list the background and reasons for nominating each individual. Unless otherwise indicated, each nominee has served for at least five years in the business position currently or most recently held.

To be elected under our majority vote standard, each director must receive thean affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast. In other words, the number of shares voted "FOR" a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast on that director. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast and will have no impact on the vote's outcome. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter and will have no impact on the vote's outcome.

GRAPHIC   The Board recommends that you vote FOR all director nominees listed in this proxy statement.

Board CompositionChairman of the Board
Independent directors91%Thomas J. Wilson
Public company board experience82%Successful operating leadership at
Public company CEO experience55%Allstate for 19 years, including seven
Relevant industry experience55%years as CEO.
Diversity45%Led continuous improvement in corporate
Tenure— over five years          55%goverance.
— under five years45%CEO for 17 months before being selected
as chairman.


Committee Chair Qualifications
Audit Committee Chair
Compensation and
Succession Committee
Chair

Nominating and
Governance Committee
Chair

Risk and Return
Committee Chair

Judith A. SprieserJack M. GreenbergF. Duane AckermanRobert D. Beyer

Audit committee financial expert under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Experience on four audit committees of public companies.

Extensive experience on public company boards, including non-executive chairman.

Former chairman and CEO of McDonald's Corporation.

Former chairman and CEO of BellSouth Corporation.

Governance experience on other public company boards.

Extensive risk and return operating experience as CEO of The TCW Group, Inc.

Global investment management expertise.


The Allstate Corporation  --|  8


Table of Contents

F. Duane Ackerman



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

F. Duane Ackerman





Independent
Age 71

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Former Chairman Emeritusand CEO of BellSouth Corporation, a communication services company.
• Former Chairman and CEO of BellSouth.


Allstate Board Service

Director since 1999

Audit committee member

Executive committee member


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

 Tenure: 15 years (1999)

• The Home Depot, Inc.2007–present
• Audit committee member• United Parcel Service, Inc.

Home Depot

 
2007–present
2007–present
Age 70

Nominating and governance committee chair

• Executive committee member    

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — director and former chairman and CEO.
ü Stockholder advocacy — experience managing risk.long-term stockholder value creation.
ü Leadership — expertise in leadership development and succession planning.
ü Strategic oversight — experience in a highly regulated industry.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Corporate Operating Experience
  CEO of a publicly traded company for nearly a decade.
  Extensive experience  Key leadership positions in the telecommunications industry which, like insurance and financial services, is highly regulated.



Compensation and Succession Experience
  Expertise in leadership development and succession planning from former operating roles and other directorships.
  Extensive experience with executive compensation decisions from his service as a director and former chairman and CEO.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Nominating and Governance Committee Chair
•  Keen insight into board dynamics and governance matters from tenure as chairman and CEO of BellSouth and current service on two other public company boards.
•  Member of The Home Depot nominating and corporate governance committee.

Audit Committee Member
•  Chair of The Home Depot audit committee since 2008.

9  --|  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents

Robert D. Beyer



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Robert D. Beyer





Independent
Age 54

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Chairman of Chaparal Investments LLC, since 2009, a private investment firm and holding company.
company, since 2009.
• Former CEO of The TCW Group, Inc., a global investment management firm with over $150 billion under management when he was CEO.
firm.
• Former director of Société Générale Asset Management, S.A. and The TCW Group, Inc.


Allstate Board Service

Director since 2006

Audit committee member


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

 Tenure: 8 years (2006)

• The Kroger Company

 
1999–present
Age 53• Audit committee member 

Compensation Leucadia National Corporation

2013–present
• Risk and successionreturn committee chair
• Executive committee member

    

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — director and former CEO.
ü Stockholder advocacy — strong investment acumen.
ü Leadership — former CEO of a global investment management firm.
ü Strategic oversight — extensive experience developing and implementing investment strategies.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Corporate Operating Experience
  Strategic and operational leadership of large asset management firm with a totalsignificant investment portfolio comparable in size to Allstate's.portfolio.
  Experience in evaluating companies' strategies, operations, and financial performance.



Relevant Industry Experience
  Risk management expertise proven through conception and development of TCW's risk management infrastructure.
  Global investment management expertise applied in assessing the strategies and performance of Allstate's $97$81 billion investment portfolio.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Risk and Return Committee Chair
•  Extensive career in finance and investment management, starting with Bear, Stearns & Co. in 1983. From 2005 until 2009, CEO and director of The TCW Group, Inc., investment management firm of over $150 billion under management. President and CIO of the principal operating subsidiary of TCW, from 2001 until 2005. Founder and current chairman of private investment firm and holding company, Chaparal Investments LLC.
•  Developed TCW's risk management infrastructure, and the compliance, operational, and financial reporting systems of Crescent Capital Corporation, an investment management firm Mr. Beyer co-founded in 1991.

Audit Committee Member
•  Member of financial policy committee of The Kroger Company board of directors.

The Allstate Corporation  --|  10


Table of Contents

Kermit R. Crawford



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Kermit R. Crawford





Independent
Age 54

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• President, Pharmacy, HeathHealth and Wellness for Walgreen Company, which operates the largest drugstore chain in the United States, since April 2011.
• Former Executive Vice President of Pharmacy Services, Senior Vice President of Pharmacy Services, Vice President and Executive Vice President of Pharmacy Benefit Management Services of Walgreen Company.


Allstate Board Service

Director since 2013

Elected to the Board on January 30, 2013


 

Other Public Board Service:Service
• Tenure: 1 year (2013)

None

 
 
Age 53• Audit committee member 

Consistent with past practice, Nominating and governance committee assignments will be established during first year of service

member
    

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — senior leadership position at a public company and service on the boards of civic organizations.

ü Stockholder advocacy — establishment of strong platforms for long-term stockholder value creation.

ü Leadership — seniorsignificant operating and leadership positions atresponsibilities in a large public company operating in the highly competitive, drugstore industry.geographically distributed business.

ü Strategic oversight — experience leading a geographically distributed, consumer-focused service business.




ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESbusiness in a highly competitive industry.



Corporate Operating ExperienceAdditional Capabilities
  Extensive operating experience valuable in overseeing Allstate's agency relationships and the delivery of exemplary customer service.
  Full-time current executive, providing ongoing consumer insights.



Relevant Industry Experience
  Expertise assessing the strategies and performance of a geographically distributed consumer-focused service business, such assimilar to Allstate's.
•  Extensive experience leading operational change, including use of technology.
•  Full-time current executive with access to ongoing consumer insights.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Audit Committee Member
•  President, Pharmacy, Health and Wellness for Walgreen Company, responsible for all aspects of strategic, operational, and profit and loss management of major division of largest national drugstore chain operator.

Nominating and Governance Committee Member
•  Member of governing bodies of several non-profit organizations, including Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital and the University of Southern California School of Pharmacy.

11  --|  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents

Jack M. Greenberg



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Jack M. Greenberg





Independent
Age 71

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Chairman of The Western Union Company, a money transfer service firm.
• Chairman of Innerworkings, Inc., a global provider of print and promotional services, since 2010.
• Former Chairman and CEO of McDonald's Corporation.


Allstate Board Service

Director since 2002

Audit committee member


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

Hasbro, Inc.

Innerworkings, Inc.

 Tenure: 12 years (2002)
 
• Hasbro, Inc.
2003–present
2007–present
Age 70

Compensation and succession committee member

chair
 

 Innerworkings, Inc.

2007–present
• Executive committee member• Manpower, Inc.

2003–present

The Western Union Company

 2003–2006–present
2006–
• Quintiles Transnational Holdings, Inc.2013–present

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — experience as chairman and former CEO.

ü Stockholder advocacy — experienceexpertise in deliveringcreating stockholder value.value in a wide variety of circumstances.

ü Leadership — led a global public company.

ü Strategic oversight — expertise in consumer focusedconsumer-focused businesses.




ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIES



Corporate Operating ExperienceAdditional Capabilities
•  Extensive executive leadership and management experience, including as chairman and CEO of McDonald's Corporation. Twenty-year public company directorship at McDonald's Corporation.
•  In-depth understanding of consumer-focused business that invests heavily in marketing.
  Experience in executive compensation as chair of the compensation committee at Manpower, Inc.
•  Expertise as an attorney, a CPA, and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
  Insight on global economy based on experience leading worldwide businesses provides perspective on Allstate's operations, across the U.S.investments, and Canada.long-term strategy.
 In-depth understanding of consumer focused business that invests heavily in marketing.
  Experience leading a business that manages extensive small business relationships and navigatingin a regulated industry.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS



Financial ExpertiseCompensation and Succession Committee Chair
 Extensive experience in evaluating financial statements  Significant expertise managing compensation programs and overseeing financial executives in his earlier roletalent as Chief Financial Officer atchairman and CEO of McDonald's Corporation.
 Expertise as an attorney, a certified public accountant,  Director of Quintiles Transnational Holdings, Inc., publicly traded global service provider with more than 28,000 employees, and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
 Experience in executiveits compensation as chair of the compensation committee at Manpower, Inc.and talent development committee.

The Allstate Corporation  --|  12


Table of Contents

Herbert L. Henkel



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Herbert L. Henkel





Independent
Age 65

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Former Chairman and CEO of Ingersoll-Rand Company, a commercial manufacturer of industrial products, since 2010.
products.
• Former President and Chief Operating Officer of Textron, Inc., a global manufacturing company.
• Former director of AT&T Corporation and Visteon Corporation.


Allstate Board Service

Director since 2013

Elected to the Board effective March 1, 2013


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

3M Company

C.R. Bard

 Tenure: 1 year (2013)
 
• 3M Company
2007–present
• Compensation and succession committee member• C.R. Bard, Inc.2002–present
Age 64

Consistent with past practice, Risk and return committee assignments will be established during first year of service

member
    

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — extensive public company board service.
ü Stockholder advocacy — lead director at C.R. Bard.
ü Leadership — former Chairmanchairman and CEO of a global public company.
ü Strategic oversight — extensive experience in global business development.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Corporate  Operating Experience
and leadership expertise as CEO of a publicly traded company for nearly a decade.
  Expertise in strategy formation, acquisitions, and execution as former Chairman and CEO.divestitures.



Financial Expertise
  Prior and current experience as chair of the 3M audit committee.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation and Succession Committee Member
  Experience overseeing financial executives  Chairman and CEO of Ingersoll-Rand Company, manufacturer of industrial products and components, from 2000 to 2010, and previously as a former CEO.President and COO.
•  Director of C.R. Bard since 2002. Currently serves as member of compensation committee, as well as lead director and member of executive, finance, and governance committees.

Risk and Return Committee Member
•  Significant experience in management and oversight of risk for publicly traded companies, including as chairman and CEO for Ingersoll-Rand Company and in various executive leadership positions at Textron, Inc. from 1995–1999.

13  --|  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents

Ronald T. LeMay



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Siddharth N. (Bobby) Mehta





Independent
Age 55

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Chairman of October Capital and Razorback Capital, private investment companies. Serves in various board and executive capacities in their portfolio companies.
• CEO of MachineryLink, Inc., a farm equipment leasing and harvest information business, since 2010.
• Chairman since 2010 and former CEO of Gogo, Inc. (formerly Aircell Corporation), a telecommunications company.
• Managing Director of Openair Equity Partners, LLC, a wireless venture capital investment firm, since 2008.
• Executive Chairman of E-Recycling Corporation, a cell phone recycling company, since 2009.
• Former Executive Chairman and CEO of Last Mile Connections, Inc., a telecommunications company.
• Former President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer, TransUnion LLC, a global provider of Sprint Corporation.credit and information management.
Age 67• Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, HSBC North America Holdings, Inc.
• Former Chief Executive Officer, HSBC Finance Corporation.

Allstate Board Service

Director since 1999

Audit committee member

Compensation and succession committee member


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

None

 Elected to the Board on February 18, 2014
 • Piramal Enterprises Ltd.2013–present
• Consistent with past practice, committee assignments will be established during first year of service• MasterCard International, Inc.2005-2006

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — director and former chairman and CEO.
ü Stockholder advocacy — investment management expertise.experience delivering stockholder value in financial services industry.
ü Leadership — broad operational and leadership experience.led complex global companies.
ü Strategic oversight — experience developing strategies in a highly regulated industry.insights from technology-driven consumer service businesses.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Corporate Operating Experience•  Extensive experience leading complex technology-based data-driven businesses.
  Experience as a former president  Significant expertise in increasing revenues and chief operating officer provides insight into regulated industries whereglobal reach through the use of technology drives business model changes.and advanced analytics.
•  Key leadership roles in corporate marketing, strategic planning, and corporate development.
  Broad  Extensive operational and leadership experience as chairman of October Capital for more than a decade.



Financial Expertise




  Extensivestrategic experience in evaluating businessthe banking industries and financial results as a private equitycredit markets provides valuable insights into the highly regulated insurance industry and venture investor.
  Financial oversight experience as CEO of MachineryLink, Inc. and former CEO of Gogo, Inc.investment activities.

The Allstate Corporation  --|  14


Table of Contents

Andrea Redmond



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Andrea Redmond





Independent
Age 58

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Independent consultant with more than 20 years of experience providing executive recruiting, succession planning, and talent management services.
• Former managing director, and co-head of the CEO/board services practice, founder and leader of global insurance practice, and member of financial services practice at Russell Reynolds Associates Inc., a global executive search firm, with 20 years of experience at the firm.

• Independent consultant providing executive recruiting, succession planning, and talent management services.

Allstate Board Service

Director since 2010

Compensation and succession committee member


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

 Tenure: 4 years (2010)

• None

  
Age 57• Compensation and succession committee member 

Nominating and governance committee member

    

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities




ü Corporate governance — executive recruitmentextensive experience assessing required board capabilities and talent management expertise.evaluating director candidates.
ü Stockholder advocacy — expertise in identifying high performing leaders.assessing leadership capabilities to execute strategies and operating plans.
ü Leadership — experience assessing and evaluating CEOs and candidates for boards.senior management; senior leadership and operating role in a global service organization.
ü Strategic oversight — insights from a wide range of industries.industries, including financial services.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Compensation•  Experience leading Russell Reynolds' global insurance and Succession Experienceboard recruitment practices for more than a decade.
  Expertise in succession planning, talent management, and compensation in public companies across industries, including financial services, technology, transportation, consumer products, and health care.healthcare.
  Experience helping companies identify and recruit leaders capable of building high performancehigh-performance organizations.



Relevant Industry Experience
  Experience leading Russell Reynolds' financial services and board recruitment practices for more than a decade.
  Founded and led Russell Reynolds' global insurance practice, providing her with insight into the insurance industry.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation and Succession Committee Member
•  Experienced in executive recruiting, succession planning, and talent management.
•  Previously a senior partner at highly regarded global executive search firm, Russell Reynolds Associates, 1986-2007, including significant tenure as co-head of the CEO/board services practice.
•  Extensive experience working with numerous publicly traded companies to recruit and place senior executives, including Hewlett-Packard, Visa USA, Bank One, United Airlines, Sprint, SAFECO, Providian Financial, AXA Financial, Polaroid Corporation, Cardinal Health, and Hewitt Associates.

Nominating and Governance Committee Member
•  Significant expertise recruiting and evaluating directors for a variety of public companies, including Walgreens, Hewlett-Packard, Visteon, Prudential, and USG Corporation.

15  --|  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents

H. John Riley, Jr.



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCEJohn W. Rowe





Independent
• Former Chairman and CEO of Cooper Industries, Ltd., a diversified manufacturer of electrical products, tools, and hardware.

Allstate Board ServiceAge 68

Director since 1998

Lead Director

Executive committee member

Other Public Board Service:

Baker Hughes, Inc.

Westlake Chemical Corporation


1997–present
2007–present
Age 72

Nominating and governance committee member


 



QUALIFICATIONSPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE



CORE CAPABILITIES
ü Corporate governance — former chairman and CEO.
ü Stockholder advocacy — Allstate's lead director.
ü Leadership — led a large public company.
ü Strategic oversight — former head of worldwide manufacturer.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIES



Corporate Operating Experience
  Executive leadership and management experience from nearly a decade of leading a large publicly traded company.
  Lead director and chair of compensation committee of Baker Hughes Incorporated.



Compensation and Succession Experience
  Extensive experience in executive compensation, succession planning, and leadership development.
  Former chair of Allstate's compensation and succession committee.

The Allstate Corporation  --  16


Table of Contents

John W. Rowe



Independent

GRAPHIC


PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Chairman Emeritus and Former Chairman and CEO of Exelon Corporation, one of the country's largest electric utilities, since 2012.
• Former Chairman and CEO of Exelon Corporation.
utilities.
• Former director of Sunoco, Inc. and Exelon Corporation.


Allstate Board Service



Other Public Board Service

Director since 2012

 Tenure: 2 years (2012)

 Northern Trust Corporation

2002–present
• Compensation and succession committee member

 Other Public Board Service:

Northern Trust Corporation

SunCoke Energy

 
2002–present
2012–present
Age 67

Nominating and governance committee member

 • American DG Energy, Inc. 2013–present

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — former chairman and CEO.extensive experience on public company boards.
ü Stockholder advocacy — lead director at Northern Trust Corporation.
ü Leadership — as chairman and CEO, led one of the country's largest electric utility companies.
ü Strategic oversight — experience in a highly regulated industry.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Corporate Operating Experience
  Extensive leadership and management experience as a CEO.
  Expertise in strategy formation and execution, which will help advance Allstate's current strategy to deliver stockholder value.



Relevant Industry Experience
  Experience in a highly regulated industry comparable to the complex insurance regulatory system in which Allstate operates.
  Lead director on the board of Northern Trust Corporation and a former director of Unum Provident, which provides him withproviding insight intoand experience in financial services and insurance.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation and Succession Committee Member
•  Leadership responsibilities as former chairman and CEO of Exelon Corporation.
•  Member of SunCoke Energy compensation committee.
•  Member of Northern Trust Corporation compensation and benefits committee.
•  Former director of Sunoco and member of its compensation committee.

Nominating and Governance Committee Member
•  Chair of corporate governance committee and lead director of Northern Trust Corporation.
•  Member of SunCoke Energy governance committee.
•  Former director of Sunoco and member of its executive committee.

17  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  16


Table of Contents

Judith A. Sprieser



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Judith A. Sprieser





Independent
Age 60

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Vice Chair of the Supervisory Board of Royal Ahold NV.
• Former CEO of Transora, Inc., a technology software and services company.
• Former director at USG Corporation and Adecco SA.


Allstate Board Service

Director since 1999

Audit committee chair


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

Experian plc

InterContinental Exchange Inc.

 Tenure: 15 years (1999)
 
• Experian plc
2010–present
• Audit committee chair• IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.2004–present
Age 59• Risk and return committee member 

Nominating and governance committee member

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc

Royal Ahold NV

 2003–present
• Executive committee member• Royal Ahold NV2006–present

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — broad public company director service.
ü Stockholder advocacy — risk managementoperating and public company board experience.
ü Leadership — former CEO.
ü Strategic oversight — skillsbreadth of exposure to drive innovation.other industries and global economy.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Corporate Operating Experience•  Extensive experience serving on boards of publicly traded and international companies, including former membership on boards of Adecco SA, USG Corporation, CBS Corporation, and Kohl's Corporation.
  Leadership  More than 20 years operational experience in executive positions at Sara Lee Corporation, including management of a start-up company provides insight into Allstate's initiatives to drive change and innovation.
  Managed several large consumer focusedconsumer-focused businesses with leading brands and significant ongoing investments in marketing while at Sara Lee Corporation.marketing.
  Oversight of a highly regulated business as a director at InterContinental Exchange.IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.



Financial Expertise
  Considerable experience in evaluating financial statements and supervising financial executives, including as Chief Financial Officerchief financial officer of the Sara Lee Corporation.
  Prior and current experience as chair of the audit committee at Allstate and InterContinental Exchange.IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Audit Committee Chair
•  Numerous key leadership positions with financial oversight responsibilities, including CEO of Transora, Inc., and CFO of Sara Lee Corporation.
•  Chair of IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc. audit committee.
•  Former chair of Experian plc audit committee.

Risk and Return Committee Member
•  Audit committee chair.
•  Significant risk oversight and management experience as CEO of start-up technology company, Transora, Inc., CFO of Sara Lee Corporation, and through extensive service on numerous public company boards in highly regulated industries.

17  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  18


Table of Contents

Mary Alice Taylor



Independent

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Mary Alice Taylor





Independent
Age 64

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Independent businessFormer senior executive with prior extensive experience in senior executive positions withseveral Fortune 500 companies, including Citicorp and FedEx Corporation.

• Independent business executive

Allstate Board Service

Director since 2000

Former service from 1996 to 1998

Audit committee member


 

Other Public Board Service:Service



 Tenure: 16 years (1996-1998; 2000–present)

• Blue Nile, Inc.

 

1999–present
Age 63• Audit committee member 

Nominating and governance committee member

    

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — public company board experience including lead director and former chairman and CEO.responsibilities.
ü Stockholder advocacy — experience with long-term growth strategies.operating and governance expertise to evaluate strategies and performance.
ü Leadership — former senior executive of major public companies.
ü Strategic oversight — strategy formation expertise.expertise, including technology-based business strategies, at both large established companies and start-ups.



ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESAdditional Capabilities



Corporate Operating Experience
  Senior executive roles in technology, finance, operations, and distribution logistics.logistics at large corporations, including Citicorp and FedEx Corporation.
  Former Chairman and CEO of HomeGrocer.com, and subsequently, Chairman and CEO of Webvan Group, Inc.



Financial Expertise
  Experience in financial oversight roles at Cook Industries, Northern Telecom, Homegrocer.com, Webvan Group, Inc., Citicorp, and FedEx Corporation.
•  Certified public accountant.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Audit Committee Member
•  Significant financial oversight expertise developed as chairman and CEO of HomeGrocer.com and in senior executive roles at Citicorp and FedEx Corporation.
•  Director and former member of the audit committee of Blue Nile, Inc.

Nominating and Governance Committee Member
  Certified Public Accountant  Chair of Blue Nile, Inc. nominating and governance committee.
•  Prior experience as lead director.

19  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  18


Table of Contents

Thomas J. Wilson



Chief Executive Officer

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

 

Thomas J. Wilson





Chief Executive Officer
Age 56

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Chairman of Allstate since May 2008.
2008 and CEO of Allstate since January 2007.
• President of Allstate since January 2005.2005 with 19 years of company service.


Allstate Board Service

Director since 2006

Chairman of the Board


 

Other Public Board Service:Service

 Tenure: 8 years (2006)

• State Street Corporation

 
2012–present
Age 55• Chairman of the Board 

Executive committee chair

    

 



QUALIFICATIONS



CORE CAPABILITIESCore Capabilities
ü Corporate governance — chairman, president, and CEO and president.of Allstate; public company board experience.
ü Stockholder advocacy — active stockholder engagement.
ü Leadership — assembled and leads Allstate's senior leadership team.

ü Strategic oversight — in-depth understanding of insurance industry anddeveloped Allstate's competitive position.




ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIESstrategy to provide differentiated customer value propositions to four consumer segments.



Corporate Operating and Relevant Industry ExperienceAdditional Capabilities
  Key leadership roles for over 1819 years throughout the enterprise.Allstate.
  Thorough and in-depth understanding of Allstate's business, including its employees, agencies, products, investments, customers, and investors.
  Leadership of Allstate's differentiated consumer strategy and operating priorities to achieve long-term stockholder value.
  Creation and implementation of Allstate's risk and return optimization program, allowing Allstate to withstand the recent financial market crisis and adapt to increases in severe weather and hurricanes.
•  In-depth understanding of insurance industry.
  Industry and community leadership, including as former chair of the Property and Casualty CEO Roundtable and the Financial Services Roundtable.Roundtable and as co-chair of a public-private partnership to reduce violence in Chicago.

COMMITTEE EXPERTISE HIGHLIGHTS

Executive Committee Chair
•  Chairman, president, and CEO of Allstate.
•  Comprehensive knowledge of Allstate's business and industry with 19 years of leadership experience.
•  Key leadership experience in numerous business and community service organizations, including The Financial Services Roundtable, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

19  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  20


Table of Contents

  



Corporate Governance Practices


PROXY STATEMENT
    

 

Corporate Governance Practices  


Board Leadership Structure and Practices

Allstate'sCorporate Governance Guidelines allow the Board the flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of chairman and of CEO in any way it considers to be in Allstate's best interests. Currently, interest.

Thomas J. Wilson is the chairman of the Board as well as CEO. The Board has determined that Allstate currently is well-served by having these roles performed by Mr. Wilson, who provides unified leadership and direction for management to execute our strategy and business plans. At other times, such as when Mr. Wilson was transitioning into the CEO role in 2007, Allstate has split the roles of chairman and CEO between two individuals.


Lead Director

H. John Riley, Jr. is the Board'sThe Board has an independent lead director. As lead director Mr. Riley:who:

Presides at all Board meetings at whichWorks with the chairman is not presentin developing Board meeting agendas and at all executive sessions.information provided to shape Board dialogue.

Serves as a liaison between the chairman and the independent directors when necessary to provide a supplemental channel of communication.directors.

Works withFacilitates the chairmanBoard's performance evaluation of the CEO in developing Board meeting agendas, schedules, and information provided to the Board.

In conjunction with the chair of the nominating and governance committee, facilitatescommittee.

Communicates with significant stockholders, when appropriate, on matters involving broad corporate policies and communicates the Board's performance evaluation of the CEO.practices.

Facilitates the evaluation of the Board and director performance.performance in conjunction with the chairman and the chair of the nominating and governance committee.

Communicates with significant stockholders on matters involving broad corporate policies and practices when appropriate.Presides at all Board meetings at which the chairman is not present, including all executive sessions.

H. John Riley, Jr., who has served as the lead director since 2011, is retiring at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. The Board will elect a new lead director following the annual meeting.


Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board is responsible for the oversight of Allstate's strategy, business results, and management, including risk management.

The Board reviews Allstate's overall risk position twice a year and uses external resources when appropriate to assess the enterprise risk and return management process.

In exercising this responsibility,2013, the Board adopted enterprise risk-return principles to guide management decision-making in optimizing long-term value creation. In addition,added a risk and return committee as a standing committee of the Board.

The following are the key responsibilities of the risk and return committee:

Assists the Board regularly reviews strategy; business plans; investment portfolios; liquidityin risk and use of capital;return governance and legal, regulatory,oversight.
Reviews risk and legislative issues. Allstate'sreturn process, policies, and guidelines used to evaluate, monitor, and manage enterprise risk management objectives and processes are reviewed quarterly byreturn.
Supports the audit committee in its oversight of risk controls and semi-annually bymanagement policies.

The chairs of the Board. This includes how management measures, evaluates,risk and manages exposure to risks posed by a wide variety of events and conditions, including the capital markets and natural catastrophes. The auditreturn committee and the audit committee are members of both committees to enhance cross-committee communication at the Board each meet annuallylevel.

The risk and return committee meets in executive session with the chief risk officer. The compensation and succession committee reviews Allstate's compensation design to ensure that it aligns with Allstate's risk-return principles.

executive at each meeting.


Board Role in Management Succession

The Board oversees the recruitment, development, and retention of executive talent.talent and directors. Management succession is discussed by the Board, in executive session and in committee meetings, as appropriate. As described in ourCorporate Governance Guidelines, the CEO meets at least annually with the compensation and succession, committee and the nominating and governance, committee to discuss succession planning and management development for senior executives.

In addition,Board meetings with the CEO advises the nominating and governance committee and the Board about chairmanin executive sessions.

Chairman and CEO succession plans under various scenarios, such as CEO retirement or incapacity. In the event of a leadership transition,incapacity, are discussed annually by the nominating and governance committee would recommend candidatesand the Board.

The Board also has first-hand exposure to senior leadership and high potential officers through working and informal meetings throughout the Board for the roles of chairman and CEO.

year.


Board Role in Setting Compensation

Our executive compensation program is based on the philosophy that compensation should be directly linked to performance; a significant percentage of compensation should be at risk for senior executives; and compensation should be aligned with shareholder return.

The compensation and succession committee reviews the executive compensation program annuallythroughout the year and uses an independent compensation consultant to benchmark market practices and to evaluate changes to the design of our executive compensation program.

Allstate's executive compensation design is also reviewed by the chief risk executive to ensure that it aligns with Board-approved risk-return principles. The compensation and succession committee makes recommendations to the Board regardingon the compensation package for the CEO and modifications to existing plans for executive officers.



The compensation and succession committee grants all equity awards to individuals designated as executive officers for purposes of Section 16 of the

The Allstate Corporation  |  20


Table of Contents

In 2013, the compensation and succession committee has sole authority to retain, terminate, and approveretained a new independent compensation consultant, Compensation Advisory Partners, after reviewing various candidates in the feesordinary course of its independent compensation consultant. In 2012, the committee retained Towers Watson as its independent compensation consultant approval process and after an evaluation of the firm's independence and performance in the role in prior years. In this role, Towers Watsoncompensation consultant's independence. The compensation consultant assessed Allstate's executive compensation design, peer group selection, and relative pay for performance. In addition, Towers Watson provided a competitive assessment ofperformance, and total direct compensation (base salary and annual and long-term incentives) for individual senior executive positions. Towers Watson also evaluated changes toRepresentatives of the executive compensation program that were proposed by management to better align pay and performance with investor input and competitive market levels and practices. Towers Watson representativesconsultant participated in fiveall seven committee meetings in 2012.

In 2012, Allstate paid $177,000 in aggregate fees to Towers Watson for executive compensation consulting services. The committee reviewed a report on additional services provided to Allstate by Towers Watson or its affiliates in 2012 for fees that exceeded $120,000 in the aggregate. In addition to executive compensation consulting services, Allstate engaged Towers Watson to provide services including benefits consulting and software license and maintenance services for fees totaling $2,879,000. These fees were primarily incurred under an agreement entered into with Watson Wyatt, prior to its merger with Towers Perrin in 2010.

The committee reviewed the additional services provided by Towers Watson and concluded that they did not create a conflict of interest. The professionals who provide executive compensation services are not involved in the provision of the other services to Allstate. The provision of the other services has had no impact on whether the executive compensation consulting services provided by Towers Watson would continue.

In 2012, the committee conducted a review of various executive compensation consultant service providers, including Towers Watson, in the ordinary course of its approval of an independent compensation consultant. The committee considered various consultant characteristics, including, independence, resources and scale, technical and industry expertise, boardroom presence, and interaction with committee members. The committee approved a new independent executive compensation consultant with services to begin in 2013.


Management Participation in Committee Meetings

Audit Committee.    OurA number of our executives, including the CEO, CFO, general counsel, chief financial officer,audit executive, chief compliance executive, chief risk officer, general counsel, secretary,executive, and controller and senior internal audit officer participate in audit committee meetings. Senior business unit and technology executives are present when appropriate. Executive sessions of the committee are scheduled and held throughout the year, including sessions in which the committee meets exclusively with the independent registered public accountant and the senior internalchief audit officer.

Nominating and Governance Committee.    Our CEO, general counsel, and secretary participate in nominating and governance committee meetings. The committee regularly meets in executive session without management present.executive.

Compensation and Succession Committee.    Our CEO, senior human resources officer, chief financial officer, general counsel, secretary, controller, and senior internal audit officerA number of our executives participate in compensation and succession committee meetings. The committee regularly meets in executive session without management present.

Our CEO advises on the alignment of our incentive plan performance measures with our overall strategy, appropriate weightings of performance measures with the responsibilities of each executive,incentive targets, and how the design of our equity incentive awards affects our ability to attract, motivate, and retain highly talented executives. He provides this advice in the context of our products, business risks, financial results, and stockholder return.awards. He also provides the committee with performance evaluations of executives who report to him and recommends senior executive merit increases and compensation packages.

Our senior human resources officerexecutive provides the committee with internal and external analyses of the basic structure and competitiveness of our compensation program and operational details on our various compensation and incentive plans, including the design of performance measures for our annual cash incentive plan and the design of our equity awards.programs. Throughout the year, he also provides the committee with a detailed review of the estimated and actual results for each performance measure compared to threshold, target, and maximum ranges, along with the resulting estimated and actual payments to executive officers.

The Allstate Corporation  --  under our incentive compensation plans.22


Table of Contents

Our chief financial officerCFO discusses financial results relevant to incentive compensation, other financial measures, or accounting rules.

The general counsel is available at meetings to provide input on the legal and regulatory environment. The secretary attends meetingsenvironment and to respond to questions about corporate governancegovernance.

The chief risk executive reports on compensation plans' alignment with Board-approved risk and to assist in the preparation of minutes.return principles.

For bothNominating and Governance Committee.    Our CEO and general counsel participate in nominating and governance committee meetings. The committee regularly meets in executive session without management present.

Risk and Return Committee.    A number of our executives, including the CEO, CFO, general counsel, and chief risk executive, participate in risk and return committee meetings. The committee regularly meets in executive session, including sessions with the chief executive officerrisk executive.


Outside Advisor Participation in Meetings

From time to time, outside experts such as governance specialists, cybersecurity experts, and the chief financial officer, committee meeting participation is one of the ways in which they assure themselves that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement is accurate so that they canadvisors attend meetings to provide the certification required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.directors additional information on issues.


Board Attendance Policy

Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the combined Board meetings and meetings of committees of which he or she was a member.

Attendance at Board and committee meetings during 20122013 averaged 98% for directors as a group. Directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board and the committees on which they serve, to actively participate in discussions,committee meetings and to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All directors who stood for election at the 20122013 annual meeting of stockholders attended thatthe annual meeting.

21  |  The Allstate Corporation


Table of Contents


Communication with the Board

The Board has established a process to facilitate communication by stockholders and other interested parties with directors as a group. Written communications may be sent by mail or email to the Board. Communications received will be handled as directed by the general counsel. The general counsel reports regularly to the nominating and governance committee on all correspondence received that, in her opinion, involves functions of the Board or its committees or that she otherwise determines merits Board attention. The communication process is posted on the Corporate Governance section of allstate.com.



Allstate has a proactive practice of discussing corporate governance issues with significant stockholders throughout the year. In addition, broader investor surveys are used when appropriate.

The audit committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of any complaints about accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

There were no compensation committee interlocks with other companies in 20122013 within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Commission's proxy rules.

During 2012,2013, the compensation and succession committee consisted of Ms. Redmond and Messrs. Beyer, Farrell, Greenberg, Henkel, LeMay, Rowe, and Smith. None isSmith, several of whom were members for a current or former officer or employeeportion of Allstate or any of its subsidiaries.

the year.


Related Person Transactions

There were no related person transactions identified for 2012.

The nominating and governance committee has adopted a written policy on the review, approval, or ratification of transactions with related persons, which is posted on the Corporate Governance portionsection of allstate.com. In accordance with the policy, the

There were no related person transactions identified for 2013.

The committee or committee chair reviews transactions with the corporation in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any "related person"related person had, has, or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In general, "related persons"related persons are directors, executive officers, their immediate family members, and stockholders beneficially owning five percent5% or more of our outstanding stock. The committee or committee chair approves or ratifies only those transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interestsinterest of the corporation and its stockholders. Transactions are reviewed and approved or ratified by the committee chair when it is not practicable or desirable to delay review of a transaction until a committee meeting. The chair reports any approved transactions to the committee. Any ongoing, previously approved or ratified related person transactions are reviewed annually.


Nominee Independence Determinations

The Board has determined that all nominees other than Mr. Wilson are independent according to applicable law, the NYSE listing standards, and the Board'sDirector Independence Standards. In accordance with theDirector Independence Standards, the Board has determined that the nature of the relationships with the corporation that are set forth in Appendix A do not create a conflict of interest that would impair a director's independence.

23  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  22


Table of Contents

  



Proposal 2 — Approve CompensationSay-on-Pay

 

PROXY STATEMENT


      

   
Proposal 2

Say-on-Pay: Advisory Vote to Approveon the Executive Compensation of the Named Executives
GRAPHICThe Board of Directors recommends that you vote for the resolution to approve the compensation of the named executives.

Strong oversight by compensation and succession committee.

Excellent 2013 business results.

Enhanced alignment with stockholders through expanded equity retention requirements for senior executives beginning with 2014 awards.

We will conduct a say-on-pay vote every year at the annual meeting. AThis say-on-pay vote is required by sectionSection 14A of the Securities Exchange Act. AlthoughAct of 1934. While the say-on-pay vote is non-binding, the Board and the compensation and succession committee will consider the voting results as part of their annual evaluation of our executive compensation program.

You may vote to approve or not approve the following advisory resolution on the executive compensation of the named executives.executives:

RESOLVED, on an advisory basis, the stockholders of The Allstate Corporation approve the compensation of the named executives, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and accompanying tables and narrative on pages 25-5724-59 of the Notice of 20132014 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

To be approved, a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal must be voted "FOR." Abstentions will be counted as shares present at the meeting and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter and will have no impact on the vote's outcome.

GRAPHIC   The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the resolution to approve the compensation of the named executives. Please read the followingExecutive Compensationsection for information necessary to inform your vote on this proposal.

23  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  24


Table of Contents

  



Executive Compensation


PROXY STATEMENT
    

 

Executive Compensation  


Executive Compensation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Named Executives

Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes Allstate's executive compensation program, including total 20122013 compensation for our named executives, who are listed below with titles as of December 31, 2012:2013:

Thomas J. Wilson — Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Steven E. Shebik — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO since February 27, 2012)(CFO)

Don Civgin — President and Chief Executive Officer, Allstate Financial (served as CFO until February 26, 2012)

Judith P. Greffin — Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Allstate Insurance Company

Suren K. Gupta — Executive Vice President — Technology & Operations of Allstate Insurance Company

Matthew E. Winter — President, Allstate Auto, Home, and AgenciesPersonal Lines

Compensation Program Changes for 2012

Stockholders approved the say-on-pay resolution on compensation in 2013 with 96% of the votes cast in favor.

The compensation and succession committee (Committee) considered the 2013 say-on-pay vote result, operating results, of the 2011 "say-on-pay" vote, investor input, and current market practices and made several changes to our executive compensation program for 2012. Stockholders approved the "say-on-pay" resolution in 2012 with 92% of the votes cast in favor. The Committee considered the same factors, including the 2012 "say-on-pay" vote result, as it evaluated whether any further changes to our executive compensation program were warranted. In the third quarter, Tom Wilson, our chairmanThe Committee also utilized its independent compensation consultant to establish compensation structure and CEO, met with stockholders representing approximately 30% of our outstanding stock to discuss a number of corporate governance matters and executive compensation program changes implemented in 2012. This ongoing dialogue with our stockholders has been very valuable. For 2012 we:

Benchmarked pay at 50th percentile of peer group.    In response to investor feedback, we replaced the former benchmark range of the 50th to 75th percentiles and now use the 50th percentile of our peer group as our benchmark for target compensation.goals.

Replaced restrictedFollowing the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, we solicited feedback from stockholders representing approximately 32% of our outstanding stock units with performance stock awards.and considered a number of governance matters, including the following compensation issues:

Reduced maximum senior executive funding for the cash incentive award pool.  We awarded performance stock awards tiedlowered the maximum cash incentive pool funding attributable to achievement of performance measures instead of time-based restricted stock units beginning in 2012 for our senior executives. The mix of long-term incentives changed in 2012 for our senior executives from 35% restricted stock units and 65% stock options250% to 50% performance stock awards and 50% stock options.200% of target beginning with the 2014 awards. Target annual cash incentive compensation, which is a specified percentage of each executive's base salary, was not changed. The maximum funding attributable to the CEO was lowered to 200% of target in 2012.

Reduced change-in-control benefits.Enhanced equity retention requirement.  We replaced our change-in-control agreements with a new change-in- control plan that eliminated excise tax gross-ups and reduced severance benefits payable upon a qualifying termination following a change-in-control. See page 38 for more information.

Implemented broaderAn equity retention requirement was added to supplement Allstate's existing stock ownership guidelines.    We adjusted Existing stock ownership guidelines apply to aapproximately half of officers and require these executives to hold 75% of net after-tax shares earned as compensation until the executive meets the salary multiple ofguideline. The salary multiple guideline is six times for the CEO and three times for other senior executives. We also implemented an additionalBeginning with awards granted in 2014, Allstate added a requirement that, regardless of a senior executive's stock ownership level, senior executives must retain at least 75% of net after-tax shares received as equity compensation be retained untilfor an executive meetsadditional year after the three-year vesting period, in the case of performance stock ownership guideline.awards (PSAs), or for an additional year after exercised, in the case of stock options. This new retention requirement applies to senior executives who receive both PSAs and stock options, which is approximately 9% of officers. See pages 38-39page 30 for more information.

Increased CEO incentive compensation target opportunities.Changes to pension benefits.  TheWe modified Allstate's pension plan so that all eligible employees earn future pension benefits under a new cash balance formula. We project that the CEO's total target direct compensation was belowfuture pension benefits will be substantially reduced as a result of these changes to the 50th percentile of ourbenefit plans. For more information, see pages 49-50.

Updated peer group. The Committee  We made changes to our compensation peer group to more closely align with insurance company peers whose revenues are similar to Allstate's and with our peer groups used by external parties. We removed Lincoln National Corporation reflecting the CEO's incentivepending sale of Lincoln Benefit Life Company and added American International Group, Inc. as it has now returned to public ownership. We used this updated peer group for 2014 compensation target opportunities. There was no change to salary.benchmarking. See pages 34-35page 31 for more information.

25  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  24


Table of Contents

    Allstate's Executive Compensation Practices

    Allstate's executive compensation program features many "bestbest practices."

    ü Pay for performance. A significant percentage 91% for our CEO, of total target direct compensation is "paypay at risk"risk that is connected to actual performance. For example, 91% of CEO target direct compensation is in annual cash incentive awards, PSAs, and stock options.

    ü

     

    Linkage between performance measures and strategic objectives. Performance measures for incentive compensation are linked to both strategic and near-term operating objectivespriorities designed to create long-term stockholder value.

    ü

     

    Independent compensation consultant. The Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to review the executive compensation program and practices.

    ü

     

    No tax gross ups. We do not provide tax gross ups beyond what islimited items which are generally available to all full-time employees.

    ü

     

    "Double trigger"trigger in the event of a change-in- control.change-in-control. Beginning with awards granted in 2012, long-term equity incentive awards have a "double-trigger;"double trigger; that is, they will not vest in the event of a change-in-control unless also accompanied by a qualifying termination of employment.

    ü

     

    No repricing or exchange of underwater stock options. Our equity incentive plan does not permit repricing or exchange of underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval, except in connection with certain corporate transactions involving Allstate or a change-in-control.

    ü

     

    No employment contracts.contracts for executive officers. Our executivesexecutive officers are "at will"at will employees with no employment agreements.


    ü


     


    Policy on insider trading that prohibits hedging of Allstate securities.

    ü

     

    Moderate change-in-control benefits. Change-in-control severance benefits are three times target cash compensation for the CEO and two times target cash compensation for senior executives.

    ü

     

    No dividends or dividend equivalents paid on unearned performance stock awards.unvested PSAs. Dividend equivalents are accrued but not paid on PSAs until the performance conditions are satisfied, and the PSAs vest after the performance measurement period.

    ü

     

    Maximum payout caps for annual cash incentive compensation and performance stock awards.PSAs.

    ü

     

    "Clawback"Clawback of certain compensation in the event of restatement.if restatement or covenant breach. Awards made to executive officers made after May 19, 2009, under short- and long-term incentive compensation plans are subject to clawback in the event of certain financial restatements. The clawbacksAnnual cash incentive and equity awards granted after May 19, 2009, are designedalso subject to discourage imprudent risk taking.cancellation or recovery in certain circumstances if the recipient violates nonsolicitation covenants. Equity awards granted after February 21, 2012, are subject to cancellation or recovery in certain circumstances if the recipient violates noncompetition covenants.

    ü

     

    Robust stockequity ownership guidelines.and retention requirements. Executives areOur CEO is required to hold stock equal to a multiple of six times salary, for our CEO and other senior executives are required to hold stock equal to a multiple of three times salary for each other named executive. In addition,salary. Until an executive meets the applicable stock ownership guideline, 75% of net after-tax shares received as equity compensation must be retained until an executive meets theretained. Beginning with awards granted in 2014, Allstate added a requirement that, regardless of a senior executive's stock ownership guideline.level, senior executives must retain at least 75% of net after-tax shares for an additional year after the three-year vesting period, in the case of PSAs, or for an additional year after exercised, in the case of stock options.

    ü

     

    No inclusion of equity awards in pension calculations.

    ü

     

    Limited executive perquisites.

    Elements of 20122013 Executive Compensation Program Design

    The following table lists the elements of target direct compensation for our 20122013 executive compensation program. The program uses a mix of fixed and variable compensation elements and provides alignment with both short- and long-term business goals through annual and long-term incentives. Our incentives are designed to drive overall corporate performance, specific business unit strategies, and individual performance using performance and operational measures that correlate to stockholder value and align with our strategic vision and operating priorities. The BoardCommittee establishes the

    The Allstate Corporation  --  26


    Table of Contents

    performance measures and ranges of performance for the variable compensation elements.elements for overall company incentive compensation awards. An individual's awardparticipation in our incentives is based primarily on corporate performance, market basedmarket-based compensation levels and individualactual performance.

    25  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


    PROXY STATEMENT
    Executive Compensation — Design



     
     Element
     Key Characteristics
     Why We Pay This
    Element

     How We Determine
    Amount

     20122013 Decisions
     
      
    Fixed
      
    Base salary
      
    Fixed compensation component payable in cash. Reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate.
       
    Provide a base level of competitive cash compensation for executive talent.
       
    Experience, job scope, market data, individual performance.
      
    5Two of 6the five named executives received a salary increaseincreases in 2012.2013. Mr. Wilson's salary hasdid not been increasedincrease in 2013, remaining the same as in the previous three years. See pages 34-37.38-39.
     
      
    Variable
       
    Annual cash incentive awards
      
    Variable compensation component payable in cash based on performance against annually established goals and assessment of individual performance.
       
    Motivate and reward executives for performance on key strategic, operational, and financial measures during the year.
       
    TargetA corporate-wide funding pool is based on job scope and market data. Actual awards based on company performance on three measures:

    Adjusted operating incomeOperating Income

    Total premiumsPremiums

    Net investment incomeInvestment Income

    Individual contribution toawards are based on job scope, market data, and individual performance.

       
    Strong performance on all three measures resulted in corporate funding at 187%200% of target for the CEO and 229%250% of target for the other named executives. See pages 31-32.27-28 and 35.


    Beginning with the 2014 awards, the maximum award pool funding attributable to senior executives has been lowered from 250% to 200% of target. The maximum attributable to the CEO was lowered to 200% in 2012.

       
       
    Performance stock awards
       
    PSAs vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
       
    Coupled with stock options, alignAlign the interests of senior executives with long-term stockholder value and serve to retain executive talent.
      
    Target awards based on job scope, market data, and market data.individual performance.

    Actual
    Earned awards based on company performance on annual adjusted operating income returnAnnual Adjusted Operating Income Return on equityEquity with a requirement of positive net incomeNet Income for any payout above target.

       
    Eliminated time-vested restricted stock units in favor of PSAs for senior executives beginning with 2012 award.

    Strong performance resulted in the maximum number of earned PSAs for the 2012 performance year.2013 measurement period. See pages 32-33.

    29-30 and 36-37.
       
        
    Stock options
       
    Nonqualified stock options that expire in ten years and become exercisable over four years: 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates.(1)
      
    Coupled with PSAs, alignAlign the interests of executives with long-term stockholder value and serve to retain executive talent.
       
    Job scope, market data, individual performance.
       
    Beginning with the 2012 awards for senior executives,The Committee continued its practice of granting stock options make up 50% of the equity awards rather than the 65% in 2011, reflecting a move to equally balance the overall long-term equity incentives between stock options and PSAs.senior executives.
     
    (1)
    Beginning with stock options granted in 2014, stock options will become exercisable over three years to reflect current market practice. One-third will become exercisable on the anniversary of the grant date for each of the three years.

    27  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  26


    Table of Contents

    Pay for PerformanceCompensation Structure and Goal Setting

    Our executive compensation program is designed to deliver compensation in accordance with corporate, business unit, and individual performance. Aperformance with a large percentage of each named executive's target total direct compensation is "pay at risk"risk through long-term equity awards and annual cash incentive awards. These awards are linked to actual performance, consistent with our belief that a significant amount of executive compensation should be in the form of equity and that a greater percentage of compensation should be tied to performance for executives who bear higher levels of responsibility for Allstate's performance. The Committee determined the mix of target direct compensation for the named executives based on job scope, market data, and investor feedback regarding the link between pay and performance. The mix of compensation for 20122013 for our CEO and the average of our other named executives is shown in the chart below.

    Compensation Mix — Target

    GRAPHIC

    Salary

    Executive salaries are set by the Board based on the Committee's recommendations. In recommending executive salary levels, the Committee uses the 50th percentile of our peer insurance companies as a guideline, which supports Allstate's ability to compete effectively for executive talent. Annual merit increases for named executives are based on evaluations of their performance, using the enterprise-wide merit increase budget as a guideline.

    Annual Cash Incentive Awards

    In 2013, executives could earn an annual cash incentive award based on Allstate's achievement of performance measures during the year and assessments of individual performance as described on pages 38-39.

    In order to qualify annual cash incentive awards as deductible performance-based compensation under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m), Allstate established a pool equal to 1.0% of Adjusted Operating Income (defined on pages 58-59). For each named executive, excluding any who served as CFO during the year, the maximum amount payable is the lesser of a stockholder approved maximum of $8.5 million under the Annual Executive Incentive Plan or a percentage of the award pool, which is 40% for the CEO and 15% for each other named executive. These limits established the maximum annual cash incentive awards that could be paid while preserving deductibility under section 162(m).

    Any named executive who served as CFO during the year may receive no more than 15% of the award pool, consistent with the award opportunity available to the other named executives other than the CEO.

    The Committee retained complete discretion to pay less than the maximum amounts described above.

    The Committee sets performance measure targets based on the operating plan after extensive review. Its decisions on threshold and maximum ranges are then informed by probability testing and operational performance scenarios, as shown on the following page.

    In the event of a net loss, the annual cash incentive award pool would have been reduced by 50% of actual performance for senior executives. For example, if performance measures ordinarily would fund the corporate pool at 60%and there was a net loss, then the corporate pool would be funded at 30% for senior executives. This mechanism prevents misalignment between pay and performance in the event of a natural catastrophe or extreme financial market conditions.

    Actual performance on three performance measures determines the overall funding level of the corporate pool and the aggregate total award budget for eligible employees.

    27  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    Target annual incentive compensation percentages for each named executive are based on market data pay levels of peer insurance companies and our benchmark target for total direct compensation at the 50th percentile.

    Individual awards are based on individual performance in comparison to position-specific compensation targets and overall company performance. The sum of individual awards has not exceeded the total corporate pool.

    We paid the cash incentive awards in March 2014. Further information on annual cash incentive award decisions can be found in theCompensation Decisions for 2013 section on pages 38-39.

    GRAPHIC


    Since Allstate created a corporate pool for annual cash incentive awards in 2011, the Committee has not exercised its discretion to increase the amount of the corporate pool beyond the calculated amount. During the first quarter of the year, the Committee establishes the measures that determine the aggregate amount of funds in the corporate pool available to be paid as awards for that year. The Committee has discretion to determine the amount of awards paid from the corporate pool to the named executives. Awards are paid in the following year.

    The Allstate Corporation  |  28


    Table of Contents

    Performance Stock Awards and Stock Options

    We grant equity awards to executives based on scope of responsibility, consistent with our philosophy that a significant amount of compensation should be in the form of equity and that a greater percentage of compensation should be tied to performance for executives who bear higher levels of responsibility for Allstate's performance. Additionally, from time to time, equity awards also are granted to attract new and retain existing executives.

    The mix of equity incentives for senior executives is approximately 50% PSAs and 50% stock options. We believe both PSAs and stock options are forms of performance-based incentive compensation because PSAs provide direct alignment with stockholder interests and stock options require stock price appreciation to deliver value to an executive.

    Beginning in 2012, PSAs tied to achievement of performance measures were granted instead of time-based restricted stock units to better align compensation with stockholder interests.

    In March 2012 and February 2013, each of the named executives was awarded a target number of PSAs. The PSAs have a three-year performance cycle. For the 2012-2014 and 2013-2015 performance cycles, the number of PSAs which become earned and vested at the end of each three-year performance cycle depends on an annual adjusted operating income return on equity measure (Adjusted Operating Income ROE) attained during each year of the performance cycle. Adjusted Operating Income ROE is defined on page 59. Adjusted Operating Income for PSAs includes a minimum or maximum amount of after-tax catastrophe losses if actual catastrophe losses are less than or exceed those amounts, respectively, which serves to decrease volatility and stabilize the measure by limiting the impact of catastrophe losses. The Committee selected Adjusted Operating Income ROE as the performance measure because it:

    Measures performance in a way that is tracked and understood by investors.

    Captures both income and balance sheet impacts, including capital management actions.

    Provides a useful gauge of overall performance while limiting the effects of factors management cannot influence, such as extreme weather conditions.

    Correlates to changes in long-term stockholder value.

    For the 2012-2014 and 2013-2015 performance cycles, performance is measured in three separate one-year periods. The actual number of PSAs earned for each measurement period varies from 0% to 200% of that period's target PSAs based on Adjusted Operating Income ROE for the performance cycle and measurement period. Beginning with the 2014-2016 performance cycle, performance will be measured in a single three-year measurement period.

    The Committee requires positive net income in order for our executives to earn PSAs based on Adjusted Operating Income ROE above target. If Allstate has a net loss in a measurement period, the number of PSAs earned would not exceed target, regardless of the Adjusted Operating Income ROE. This hurdle is included to prevent misalignment between Allstate reported net income and the PSAs earned based on the Adjusted Operating Income ROE result. This situation could occur if, for example, catastrophe losses or capital losses that are not included in Adjusted Operating Income ROE caused Allstate to report a net loss for the period.

    At the end of each measurement period, the Committee certifies the level of our Adjusted Operating Income ROE achievement, as well as the resulting number of PSAs earned by each named executive for that measurement period. The Committee does not have the discretion to adjust the performance achievement upward for any measurement period. PSAs earned will vest following the end of the three-year performance cycle, subject to continued employment (other than in the event of death, disability, retirement, or a qualifying termination following a change-in-control).

    29  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    Beginning with the 2014-2016 performance cycle, performance will be measured in a single three-year measurement period. The performance measure is calculated by taking the average of adjusted operating income for each of the three years of the performance cycle, adjusted to reflect a minimum or maximum amount of catastrophe losses, if the average of actual after-tax catastrophe losses in the three-year cycle is less than or exceed those amounts, respectively. This average is then divided by the average of the shareholders' equity, excluding unrealized gains and losses, on December 31, 2013 and each year-end in the performance cycle. Below is the range of performance for the 2014-2016 performance cycle. The Committee considered historical and expected performance when approving the range of performance for the 2014-2016 performance cycle.


    2014-2016 Performance Stock Awards Range of Performance
     
     
     Three-Year Average
    Annual Adjusted Operating
    Income Return on Equity

     
     
     Threshold
     Target
     Maximum
     
    Measurement Period 2014-2016 6.0% 13.0% 14.5%
     
    Payout 0% 100% 200%
     
        GRAPHIC        

    Equity Ownership and Retention Requirements

    Instituted in 1996, stock ownership guidelines require each of the named executives to own Allstate common stock worth a multiple of base salary to link management and stockholders' interests. The following charts below.show the salary multiple guidelines and the equity holdings that count towards the requirement. The current stock ownership guidelines apply to approximately half of officers and require these executives to hold 75% of net after-tax shares received as a result of equity compensation awards until his or her salary multiple guideline is met.

    Stock Ownership as Multiple of Base Salary
    as of December 31, 2013

     
    Named Executive
     Guideline
     Actual
     
    Mr. Wilson 6 20
     
    Mr. Shebik 3 6
     
    Mr. Civgin 3 4
     
    Ms. Greffin 3 5
     
    Mr. Winter 3 4
     


    Mr. WilsonWhat Counts Toward the Guideline Average of Other Named ExecutivesWhat Does Not Count Toward the Guideline


    GRAPHIC
    Allstate shares owned personally

    Shares held in the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan

    Restricted stock units




    GRAPHIC
    Unexercised stock options

    Performance stock awards

    BecauseBeginning with awards granted in 2014, Allstate added a large portionrequirement that, regardless of executive compensation isa senior executive's stock ownership level, senior executives must retain at least 75% of net after-tax shares for an additional year after the three-year vesting period, in the formcase of incentive compensation that is tied to actual performance, compensation realized by the named executives will vary from the compensation targeted by the Committee. Allstate's unique strategy of offering differentiated products and services to the four consumer segments of the insurance market is working to deliver stockholder value. Allstate's total stockholder return relative to the market cap weighted average of the peer group usedPSAs, or for compensation benchmarking (identified on page 29) over one-, three-, and five-year periods is demonstratedan additional year after exercised, in the following chart.case of stock options. This new retention requirement applies to senior executives who receive both PSAs and stock options, which is approximately 9% of officers.

    We also have a policy on insider trading that prohibits all officers, directors, and employees from engaging in transactions in securities issued by Allstate or any of its subsidiaries that might be considered speculative or hedging, such as selling short or buying or selling options.

    ComparisonTiming of Total Shareholder ReturnEquity Awards and Grant Practices

    GRAPHICTypically, the Committee approves grants of equity awards during a meeting in the first fiscal quarter. The timing allows the Committee to align awards with our annual performance and business goals.



    Throughout the year, the Committee may grant equity incentive awards to newly hired or promoted executive officers. The grant date for these awards is fixed as the first business day of a month following the later of committee action or the date of hire or promotion.

    For additional information on the Committee's practices, see theCorporate Governance Practices section of this proxy statement.

    The Allstate Corporation  --|  2830


    Table of Contents

    Our strong performance, both relative and absolute, combined with our compensation program design that emphasizes incentive compensation tied to performance, resulted in a strong linkage between performance and compensation for the named executives in 2012.


    Compensation PracticesPeer Benchmarking

      Peer Benchmarking

    The Committee monitors performance toward goals throughout the year and reviews executive compensation program design and executive pay levels annually. As part of that evaluation, an independent compensation consultant, Towers WatsonCompensation Advisory Partners, provided executive compensation data, information on current market practices, and alternatives to consider when determining compensation for our named executives. The Committee benchmarked our executive compensation program design, executive pay, and performance against a group of peer insurance companies that are publicly traded and comparable to Allstate in product offerings,traded. Product mix, market segment, annual revenues, premiums, assets, and market value.value were considered when identifying peer companies. The Committee believes Allstate competes against these companies for executive talent and stockholder investment. The Committee established the current peer group in 2009. The Committee reviews the composition of the peer group annually with the assistance of its compensation consultant. There were no modificationsIn late 2013, we removed Lincoln National Corporation reflecting the pending sale of Lincoln Benefit Life Company and added American International Group, Inc. as it has now returned to public ownership. We used this updated peer group for 2014 compensation benchmarking.

    The following table reflects the peer group used for 2012.2013 compensation benchmarking.

    PEER INSURANCE COMPANIES(1)
    PEER INSURANCE COMPANIES(1)
    PEER INSURANCE COMPANIES(1)
    Company Name
     Revenue
    ($ in billions)

     Market Cap
    ($ in billions)

     Assets
    ($ in billions)

     Premiums
    ($ in billions)

     Property and
    Casualty
    Insurance
    Products

     Life Insurance
    and Financial
    Products

     Revenue
    ($ in billions)

     Market Cap
    ($ in billions)

     Assets
    ($ in billions)

     Premiums
    ($ in billions)

     Property and
    Casualty
    Insurance
    Products

     Life Insurance
    and Financial
    Products

    ACE Ltd.

     18.0 27.2 92.5 15.7 ü   19.2 35.2 94.5 16.6 ü  

    AFLAC Inc.

     25.4 24.8 131.1 22.1   ü 23.9 30.7 121.3 20.1   ü

    The Chubb Corporation

     13.6 19.7 52.2 11.8 ü   13.9 24.0 50.4 12.1 ü  

    The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

     26.4 9.8 298.5 17.5 ü ü 26.2 16.4 277.9 15.4 ü ü

    Lincoln National Corporation

     11.5 7.0 218.9 6.2   ü 12.0 13.6 236.9 6.8   ü

    Manulife Financial Corporation

     36.3 24.9 488.8 18.1   ü 16.0 34.3 454.2 16.0   ü

    MetLife Inc.

     68.2 36.0 836.8 46.5 ü ü 68.2 60.5 885.3 47.1 ü ü

    The Progressive Corporation

     17.1 12.8 22.7 16.0 ü   18.2 16.2 24.4 17.1 ü  

    Prudential Financial, Inc.

     84.8 24.8 709.3 69.8   ü 41.5 42.7 731.8 31.7   ü

    The Travelers Companies, Inc.

     25.7 27.1 104.9 22.4 ü   26.2 32.0 103.8 22.6 ü  

    Allstate

     33.3 19.2 126.9 29.0 ü ü 34.5 24.5 123.5 30.0 ü ü

    Allstate Ranking

     4 of 11 8 of 11 7 of 11 3 of 11    

    Allstate Ranking Relative to Peers:

     

    — Property and Casualty Insurance

     2 of 7 4 of 7 3 of 7 2 of 7    

    — Life Insurance and Financial Products

     3 of 7 5 of 7 6 of 7 3 of 7    

    — All Peer Insurance Companies

     3 of 11 7 of 11 6 of 11 3 of 11    
    (1)
    Information as of year-end 2012.2013.

    In its executive pay discussions, the Committee also considered compensation information for S&P 100 companies with $15 billion to $60 billion in fiscal 20112012 revenue. We compete with these publicly traded companies for executive talent. If compensation data was unavailable for certain executive positions, the

    The Committee consideredutilized compensation surveys that provided information on companies of broadly similar size and business mix as Allstate, as well as companies with a broader market context. The compensation surveys considered include the Towers Watson Diversified Insurance Survey, the Towers Watson General Industry Survey, and the Frederic W. Cook General Industry Survey. The Towers Watson Diversified Insurance Survey includes insurance companies with assets greater than $100$125 billion. The Towers Watson General Industry Survey includes companies with revenue greater than $20 billion.



    The Committee uses the 50th50th percentile of our peer group as a guideline in setting the target total direct compensation of our named executives. Within the guideline, the Committee balances the various elements of compensation based on individual performance,experience, job scope and responsibilities, experience,performance, and market practices.

    2931  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

      Salary
      Other Elements of Compensation

    Executive salariesTo remain competitive with other employers and to attract, retain, and motivate highly talented executives and other employees, we offer the benefits listed in the following table.

    Benefit or Perquisite
    Named
    Executives

    Other
    Officers
    and Certain
    Managers

    All Full-time
    and Regular
    Part-time
    Employees

    401(k)(1) and defined benefit pension

      •  

    Supplemental retirement benefit

      •  

    Health and welfare benefits(2)

      •  

    Supplemental long-term disability

      •  

    Deferred compensation

      •  

    Tax preparation and financial planning services

      •(3)

    Personal use of aircraft, ground transportation, and mobile devices(4)

      •  
    (1)
    Allstate contributed $.56 for every dollar of basic pre-tax deposits made in 2013 (up to 5% of eligible pay).

    (2)
    Including medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment, long-term disability, and group legal insurance.

    (3)
    All officers are set by theeligible for tax preparation services. Financial planning services were provided only to senior executives.

    (4)
    The Board based on the Committee's recommendations. In recommending executive base salary levels, the Committee uses the 50th percentile of our peer insurance companies as a guideline, which supports Allstate's ability to compete effectively for executive talent. Annual merit increases for the named executives other thanencourages the CEO are based on evaluations of their performanceto use our corporate aircraft when it improves his efficiency in managing the company, even if it is for personal purposes. Personal usage is counted as taxable compensation. In limited circumstances approved by the CEO, Committee,senior executives are permitted to use our corporate aircraft for personal purposes. Ground transportation is available to senior executives. Mobile devices are available to senior executives, other officers, and Board, using the enterprise-wide merit increase budget ascertain managers and employees depending on their job responsibilities.


    Retirement Benefits

    Each named executive participates in two different defined benefit pension plans. The Allstate Retirement Plan (ARP) is a guideline. An annual merit increase for the CEO istax qualified defined benefit pension plan available to all of our regular full-time and regular part-time employees who meet certain age and service requirements. The ARP provides an assured retirement income based on an evaluationemployee's level of his performancecompensation and market conditions bylength of service at no cost to the Committeeemployee. As the ARP is a tax qualified plan, federal tax law limits (1) the amount of an individual's compensation that can be used to calculate plan benefits and (2) the Board.

      Annual Cash Incentive Awards

    In 2012 executives could earntotal amount of benefits payable to a plan participant on an annual basis. For certain employees, these limits may result in a lower benefit under the ARP than would have been payable otherwise. Therefore, the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (SRIP) is used to provide ARP-eligible employees whose compensation or benefit amount exceeds the federal limits with an additional defined benefit in an amount equal to what would have been payable under the ARP if the federal limits did not exist.


    Change-in-Control and Post-Termination Benefits

    Consistent with our compensation objectives, we offer these benefits to attract, motivate, and retain executives. A change-in-control of Allstate could have a disruptive impact on both Allstate and our executives. Change-in-control benefits and post-termination benefits are designed to mitigate that impact and to maintain alignment between the interests of our executives and our stockholders.

    We substantially reduced change-in-control benefits in 2011. Compared with the previous arrangements, the change-in-control severance plan (CIC Plan) eliminates all excise tax gross ups and eliminates the lump sum cash incentive awardpension enhancement based on Allstate's achievementadditional years of performance measures duringage, service, and compensation. For the yearCEO, the amount of cash severance payable is three times the sum of base salary and assessmentstarget annual incentive. For the other named executives, the amount of individual performance.

    cash severance payable is two times the sum of base salary and target annual incentive. In order to qualify annualreceive the cash severance benefits under the CIC Plan following a change-in-control, a participant must have been terminated (other than for cause, death, or disability) or the participant must have terminated employment

    The Allstate Corporation  |  32


    Table of Contents

    for good reason (such as adverse changes in the terms or conditions of employment, including a material reduction in base compensation, a material change in authority, duties, or responsibilities, or a material change in job location) within two years following a change-in-control. In addition, long-term equity incentive awards granted after 2011 will vest on an accelerated basis due to a change-in-control only if either Allstate terminates the executive's employment (other than for cause, death, or disability) or the executive terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years after the change-in-control (so-called double-trigger vesting).

    The change-in-control and post-termination arrangements which are described in thePotential Payments as deductible performance-baseda Result of Termination or Change-in-Control section are not provided exclusively to the named executives. A larger group of management employees is eligible to receive many of the post-termination benefits described in that section.


    Impact of Tax Considerations on Compensation

    We may take a tax deduction of no more than $1 million per executive for compensation under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m), a pool equalpaid in any year to 1.0% of Adjusted Operating Income (defined on page 56) was established. The maximum amount payable toour CEO and the three other most highly compensated executives, excluding any named executive whoindividual that served as CFO during the year, is an amount equal to 15%as of the award pool.last day of the fiscal year in which the compensation is paid, unless the compensation meets specific standards. We may deduct more than $1 million in compensation if the compensation is performance-based and paid under a plan that meets certain requirements. The maximum amount payableCommittee considers the impact of this rule in developing, implementing, and administering our compensation programs. However, the Committee balances this consideration with our primary goal of structuring compensation programs to attract, motivate, and retain highly talented executives.

    Our compensation programs are designed and administered so that payments to affected executives can be fully tax-deductible. However, in light of the CEObalance mentioned above and the three most highly compensated executives, excludingneed to maintain flexibility in administering compensation programs, we may authorize compensation in any named executive who served as CFO duringyear that exceeds $1 million and does not meet the year, is the lesser of a stockholder approved maximum of $8.5 million under the Annual Executive Incentive Plan or a percentage, which varies by executive, of the award pool.required standards for deductibility. The CEO can earn up to 40% of the pool, while the maximum percentage for each other named executive is 15% of the pool. These limits established the maximum annual cash incentive awards that could be paid while preserving deductibility under section 162(m). The Committee retained complete discretion to pay less than these maximum amounts, with actual awards based on the named executive's target annual incentive award opportunity and the achievement of performance measures and assessments of individual performance. The target annual incentive award opportunity for each named executive was determined based on market data pay levels at peer insurance companies and our benchmark target for total direct compensation at the 50th percentile.

      Long-term Equity Incentive Awards

    We grant equity awards to executives based on scope of responsibility, consistent with our philosophy that a significant amount of executive compensation should bepaid in the form of equity and2013 that a greater percentage of compensation should be tied to performancewas not deductible for executives who bear higher levels of responsibility for Allstate's performance. Additionally, from time to time, equity awards are also granted to attract new executives. The Committee annually reviews the mix of equity incentives provided to the named executives. Beginning with awards made to our senior executives in 2012, the mix of equity incentives changed to 50% performance stock awards and 50% stock options. We believe stock options are a form of performance-based incentive compensation because they require stock price growth to deliver any value to an executive, while performance stock awards provide direct alignment with stockholder interests.

      Timing of Equity Awards and Grant Practices

    Typically, the Committee approves grants of equity awards during a meeting in the first fiscal quarter. The timing allows the Committee to align awards with our performance and business goals. Throughout the year, the Committee may grant equity incentive awards to newly hired or promoted executive officers.tax purposes was $13,141,261.

    The Committee approves grants of equity awards to executive officers. Under authority delegated by the Board and Committee, an equity award committee may grant, to employees other than executive officers, restricted stock units and stock options to newly hired and promoted executives and in recognition of outstanding achievements. At each regularly scheduled meeting the Committee reviews equity awards granted by the equity award committee. The grant date for awards to newly hired or promoted executives is fixed as the first business day of a month following the later of committee action or the date of hire or promotion. For additional information on the Committee's practices, see theCorporate Governance Practices33  section of this proxy statement.

    |  The Allstate Corporation  --  30


    Table of Contents


    PROXY STATEMENT
    Executive Compensation — Earned Awards

    2013 Performance Measures for 2012and Compensation

    The performancecompany's strong 2013 operating and financial results led to above-target annual incentive compensation payments for the named executives in 2013. Total shareholder return for 2013 was 38%.

    Performance measures are based on Allstate's strategy of providing differentiated products and services to distinct consumer segments, 20122013 priorities, and the profitability commitments made to investors.2013 operating plan.

    Our unique strategy 20122013 Priorities



    GRAPHICGRAPHIC


     


      

    Grow insurance premiums.

    Maintain auto profitabilityprofitability.

    Raise returns in homeowners and annuities businesses

    Grow insurance premiumsannuity businesses.

    Proactively manage investments and capitalinvestments.

    Reduce our cost structure.

    In 2012,2013, Allstate continued to deliver on its customer-focused strategy and operating priorities. Net income available to common shareholders for 20122013 was $2.26 billion, or $4.81 per diluted common share, compared with $2.31 billion, or $4.68 per diluted common share, in 2012. Operating income* was $2.67 billion, or $5.68 per diluted common share, compared to $787 million,$2.15 billion, or $1.50$4.36 per diluted common share in 2011. The increase was primarily2012, due in part to higher property-liability and Allstate Financial operating income,lower 2013 catastrophe losses partially offset by lower net realized capital gains.the $150 million in after-tax pension settlement charges. Book value per common share increased 6.9% to $45.31 at year-end 2013.

    Allstate Protection made progress on achievingachieved its five operating priorities in 2012.2013:

    Grow insurance premiums.  We maintained strong autogrew insurance profitability and significantly improved homeowners underlying margins, despitepolicies in force in all three brands during the impact of catastrophes.year, reflecting continued positive momentum in serving unique consumer segments with differentiated offerings. Total Allstate Protection net written premium was $27.03$28.16 billion, an increase of 4%4.2% over 2011. The2012. Allstate Financial grew total premiums and contract charges by 5.0% in 2013, including a 5.5% increase was primarily the result of our acquisition of Esurance to serve the self directed consumer segment. Thein underwritten products, such as life insurance and voluntary accident and health insurance.

    Maintain auto profitability.  We also maintained good auto insurance profitability in 2013. Allstate's property-liability business produced a 92.0 combined ratio of 95.5 wasfor 2013, 3.5 points better than 2012.

    Raise returns in homeowners and annuity businesses.  Allstate brand homeowners benefited from actions to position this business for sustainable profitability. Annuity returns improved in 2013 due primarily to higher investment spread, although long-term returns remain challenged by continued low interest rates. During the year, we also announced a 7.9 point improvement from the 2011 combined ratio of 103.4.

    definitive agreement to sell Lincoln Benefit Life Company and its life insurance business generated through independent master brokerage agencies, deferred fixed annuity and long-term care insurance business. Allstate Financial increased sales through Allstate agencies with a 9.3% increase in issuedis now focused on providing life insurance policies written in 2012. Allstate Benefits, Allstate Financial'sand voluntary employee benefits unit, had a successful annual enrollment season, achieving a 6.5% increase in new business written forproducts through the year.

    Allstate agency and Allstate Benefits channels.

    Proactively manage investments.Allstate Investments continued to apply a proactive approach to risk and return optimization throughout 2013. The total portfolio yield for the year was 4.6%, comparable to 2012. Proactive management actions delivered solid total returns of 7.3% in 2012,Total portfolio return for the year was 1.8%, primarily driven by increases inlow fixed income andperformance which was enhanced by strong equity appreciation, and stable netreturns including limited partnerships. Net investment income reflecting highertotaled $3.94 billion in 2013, and included $541 million from limited partnership results.interests and $139 million related to prepayment fee income and litigation proceeds.

    Reduce our cost structure.  Allstate also made progress in reducing its future cost structure in 2013, including changes to its benefit offerings.


      *
      For definition of this item, see Appendix E.

      The Allstate Corporation  |  34


      Table of Contents

      Allstate's total stockholder return relative to the market cap-weighted average of the peer group used for 2013 compensation benchmarking, property and casualty insurance company peers, and life insurance company peers (each identified on page 31) over one-, three-, and five-year periods is demonstrated in the following chart.


      Comparison of Total Stockholder Return

      GRAPHIC


      Annual Cash Incentive Awards

    TheIn 2013, the total annual cash incentive funding for 2012 annual incentive awards ispool was calculated based on three measures: Adjusted Operating Income, Total Premiums, and Net Investment Income. These measures were selected based on their strong correlation with overall stockholder value creation through profitable growth, business unit performance, or achievementFor a description of strategic priorities. All ofhow these measures are defined in detail oncalculated, see pages 56-57.58-59. The ranges of performance and 2013 actual results are shown in the following table.

    31  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    2012 Annual Cash Incentive Award Performance Measures
    2013 Annual Cash Incentive Award Performance Measures
    2013 Annual Cash Incentive Award Performance Measures
    Measure
     Threshold
     Target
     Maximum
     Actual Results
     Threshold
     Target
     Maximum
     Actual Results
    Adjusted Operating Income(in millions) $2,650 $3,100 $3,500 Above Maximum
      $3,685
     $1,500 $1,900 $2,300 $2,315
    Total Premiums(in millions) $28,100 $28,800 $29,500 Between Target
    and Maximum
    $29,248
     $29,600 $30,000 $30,400 $30,510
    Net Investment Income(in millions) $3,600 $3,765 $3,900 Between Target
    and Maximum
    $3,879
     $3,400 $3,600 $3,750 $3,941
    Payout Percentages  
    CEO 50%*  100% 200% 187% payout 50%* 100% 200% 200% payout
    Other Named Executives 50%*  100% 250% 229% payout 50%* 100% 250% 250% payout
    *
    Actual performance below threshold results in a 0% payout.

    Targets were set based on the 2012 operating plan, which was extensively reviewed, discussed, and assented to by the Board. The ranges for threshold and maximum were then informed by statistical modeling and probability testing. Our models measured the variability of actual results so that the measures require superior performance to achieve maximum levels. The performance ranges were then calibrated against expectations of business operations, risks, and industry and economic trends.

    In the event of a net loss, the annual cash incentive award pool would have been reduced by 50% of actual performance. For example, if performance measures ordinarily would fund the pool at 60%and35  there was a net loss, then the pool would be funded at 30%. This mechanism would have prevented a misalignment between pay and performance in the event of a natural catastrophe or extreme financial market conditions.

    The Committee approved the annual incentive award performance measures and the threshold, target, and maximum ranges in the first quarter of 2012. Beginning in the second quarter, the Committee reviewed the extent to which performance measures were achieved, and it approved the final results in the first quarter of 2013. Actual performance on the three performance measures determined the overall funding level of the pool and the aggregate total award budget for eligible employees. Individual awards are based on actual performance on the three performance measures and the resulting payout percentage, each named executive officers' target annual incentive award opportunity percentage, and considerations of individual performance. The Committee evaluated each executive officer's individual performance and contributions and approved the actual amount of all cash incentive awards for our executive officers, including the named executives. Further information on annual incentive award decisions can be found in theCompensation Decisions for 2012 section below. We paid the cash incentive awards in March 2013.

      Performance Stock Awards

    Beginning in 2012, we granted one-half of our long-term equity incentive awards to senior executives in the form of performance stock awards (PSAs) tied to achievement of performance measures. The PSAs were granted instead of time-based restricted stock units as they more closely align compensation with stockholder interests and Allstate's long-term performance.

    In March 2012, each of the named executives was awarded a target number of PSAs. The PSAs granted in 2012 have a three-year performance cycle (2012-2014). The number of PSAs which become earned and vested at the end of the three-year performance cycle depends on our annual adjusted operating income return on equity attained during each year of the performance cycle. Annual adjusted operating income return on equity ("Adjusted Operating Income ROE") is defined on page 57. Adjusted Operating Income ROE includes a minimum and maximum amount of after-tax catastrophe losses if actual catastrophe losses are less than or exceed those amounts, respectively, which serves to decrease volatility and stabilize the measure by limiting the impact of extreme weather conditions. The Committee selected

    |  The Allstate Corporation  --  32


    Table of Contents


    Performance Stock Awards

    Adjusted Operating Income ROE asis the performance measure because it —

    Captures both income and balance sheet impacts, including capital management actions.

    Providesused for PSAs. For a useful gaugedescription of overall performance while limiting the effects of extreme weather conditions and other items that management cannot influence.

    Measures performance in a way thathow this measure is tracked and understood by investors.

    Correlates to changes in long-term stockholder value.

    Performance is measured in three separate one-year periods. The actual number of PSAs earnedcalculated for each measurement period varies from 0% to 200% of that period's target PSAs based on Adjusted Operating Income ROE for the period.performance cycle, see page 59. The measurement periods and levels of Adjusted Operating Income ROE needed to earn the threshold, target, and maximum number of PSAs for the measurement period as well as actual results are set forth in the table below. The annually increasing performance goals and a 13% maximum in 2014 are consistent with the corporation's return objectives and recognize the inherent earnings volatility of Allstate's business.

    2012-2014 Performance Stock Awards Ranges of Performance
    Performance Stock Awards Ranges of Performance
    Performance Stock Awards Ranges of Performance
    Annual Adjusted Operating
    Income Return on Equity

     Threshold
     Target
     Maximum
     Actual Results

     Annual Adjusted Operating Income Return on Equity

     Threshold
     Target
     Maximum
     Actual Results
    2012-2014 PSA Performance Cycle 
    Measurement Period 2012 4.0% 10.0% 11.5%12.3% 4.0% 10.0% 11.5%12.3%
    Measurement Period 2013 4.5% 10.5% 12.25%  To be determined 2014 4.5% 10.5% 12.25%13.1%
    Measurement Period 2014 5.0% 11.0% 13.0%  To be determined 2015 5.0% 11.0% 13.0%  To be determined in 2015
    2013-2015 PSA Performance Cycle 
    Measurement Period 2013 6.0% 11.0% 12.5%13.4%
    Measurement Period 2014 6.0% 12.0% 13.5%  To be determined in 2015
    Measurement Period 2015 6.0% 13.0% 14.5%  To be determined in 2016
    Payout 0% 100% 200%  0% 100% 200% 
     
    GRAPHIC
      
      GRAPHIC 
     

    The Committee included a requirementAllstate Corporation  |  36


    Table of positive net income in order to earn PSAs based on Adjusted Operating Income ROE above target. In the event of a net loss in a measurement period, the number of PSAs earned would be limited to target, regardless of the Adjusted Operating Income ROE. This hurdle was included to prevent misalignment between Allstate reported net income and the PSAs earned based on the Adjusted Operating Income ROE result. This situation could occur if catastrophe losses or investment losses that are not included in Adjusted Operating Income ROE caused Allstate to report a net loss for the period.Contents

    At the end of each measurement period, the Committee certifies the level of our Adjusted Operating Income ROE achievement, as well as the resulting number of PSAs earned by each named executive for that measurement period. The Committee does not have the discretion to adjust the performance achievement upward for any measurement period. PSAs earned will vest following the end of the three year performance cycle, subject to continued employment (other than in the event of death, disability, retirement, or a qualifying termination following a change in control).

    Based on our Adjusted Operating Income ROE of 12.3% for 2012, 200% of the target number of PSAs for the 2012 measurement period were earned by our named executives and will be received on the conversion date in 2015, subject to continued employment (other than in the event of death, disability, retirement, or a qualifying termination following a change in control). The following table shows the target number of PSAs granted to each of our named executives for the 2012-2014 and 2013-2015 performance cycle,cycles, the target number of PSAs for the 2012each measurement period, and the number of PSAs earned based on achievement of the performance measure.

                                 
    2012-2014 Performance Cycle
     
      
     
      
     2012 Measurement Period
     2013 Measurement Period
     2014 Measurement Period
     
      
    Named
    Executive

     Target
    Number
    of PSAs for
    2012-2014
    Performance
    Cycle

     Target
    Number
    of
    PSAs

     Actual
    Result

     Number
    of
    PSAs
    Earned

     Target
    Number
    of
    PSAs

     Actual
    Result

     Number
    of
    PSAs
    Earned

     Target
    Number
    of
    PSAs

     Actual
    Result

     Number
    of
    PSAs
    Earned

     
      
    Mr. Wilson  124,194  41,398 Maximum  82,796  41,398 Maximum  82,796  41,398      
      
    Mr. Shebik  9,736  3,245 Maximum  6,490  3,245 Maximum  6,490  3,246 To be determined 
      
    Mr. Civgin  30,645  10,215 Maximum  20,430  10,215 Maximum  20,430  10,215 in 2015. 
      
    Ms. Greffin  29,032  9,677 Maximum  19,354  9,677 Maximum  19,354  9,678      
      
    Mr. Winter  40,323  13,441 Maximum  26,882  13,441 Maximum  26,882  13,441      
      


    2013-2015 Performance Cycle
     
      
     
      
     2013 Measurement Period
     2014 Measurement Period
     2015 Measurement Period
     
      
    Named
    Executive

     Target
    Number
    of PSAs for
    2013-2015
    Performance
    Cycle

     Target
    Number
    of
    PSAs

     Actual
    Result

     Number
    of
    PSAs
    Earned

     Target
    Number
    of
    PSAs

     Actual
    Result

     Number
    of
    PSAs
    Earned

     Target
    Number
    of
    PSAs

     Actual
    Result

     Number
    of
    PSAs
    Earned

     
      
    Mr. Wilson  84,411  28,137 Maximum  56,274  28,137       28,137      
      
    Mr. Shebik  19,733  6,577 Maximum  13,154  6,578 To be determined  6,578 To be determined 
      
    Mr. Civgin  23,021  7,673 Maximum  15,346  7,674 in 2015.  7,674 in 2016. 
      
    Ms. Greffin  20,061  6,687 Maximum  13,374  6,687       6,687      
      
    Mr. Winter  27,817  9,272 Maximum  18,544  9,272       9,273      
      

    3337  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


    Named Executive

     

    Target Number
    of PSAs
    (2012-2014
    Performance
    Cycle)


     

    Target Number
    of PSAs
    (2012
    Measurement
    Period)


     

    Achievement
    for 2012
    Measurement
    Period


     

    Number of
    PSAs
    Earned (2012
    Measurement
    Period)


     
      

    Mr. Wilson

      124,194  41,398  Maximum  82,796 
      

    Mr. Shebik

      9,736  3,245  Maximum  6,490 
      

    Mr. Civgin

      30,645  10,215  Maximum  20,430 
      

    Ms. Greffin

      29,032  9,677  Maximum  19,354 
      

    Mr. Gupta

      21,169  7,056  Maximum  14,112 
      

    Mr. Winter

      40,323  13,441  Maximum  26,882 
      

    In response to stockholder feedback, we are disclosing the ranges of performance for the 2013-2015 PSA performance cycle. The 2013-2015 performance cycle uses the same design as the 2012-2014 cycle adjusted to reflect an updated maximum and minimum amount of catastrophe losses. The Committee considered historical and expected performance when approving the ranges of performance for the 2013-2015 performance cycle.

    2013-2015 Performance Stock Awards Ranges of Performance
     
      
    Annual Adjusted Operating
    Income Return on Equity

     Threshold
     Target
     Maximum
     
      
    Measurement Period 2013  6.0% 11.0% 12.5%
      
    Measurement Period 2014  6.0% 12.0% 13.5%
      
    Measurement Period 2015  6.0% 13.0% 14.5%
      
    Payout  0% 100% 200%
      
          
    GRAPHIC
      
     


    Compensation Decisions for 20122013

    Mr. Wilson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

    As stated in its charter, one of the Committee's most important responsibilities is to recommend the CEO's compensation to the Board. The Committee establishes the CEO's goals and, in conjunction with the nominating and governance committee, evaluates performance based on predetermined goals and actual results. When reviewing performance relative to these goals, the Board discusses the Committee's recommendations in executive session, without the CEO present. The Committee fulfills its oversight responsibilities and provides meaningful recommendations to the Board by analyzing competitive compensation data provided by its independent compensation consultant and company performance data. The Committee reviews the various elements of the CEO's compensation in the context of the total compensation package, including salary, annual cash incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards, and then presents its recommendations to the Board within this total compensation framework.

    Mr. Wilson's total compensation and the amount of each compensation element are driven by the design of our compensation program, his experience, responsibility for Allstate's overall strategic direction, performance, and operations, and the Committee's analysis of peer company CEO compensation. In conjunction with the Committee's independent compensation consultant, the Committee conducts an annual review of Mr. Wilson's total target direct compensation and determines if any changes are warranted.



    During the 2012 annual review, it was determined that Mr. Wilson's compensation opportunity should be increased to align with Allstate's practice of targeting

    The Allstate Corporation  --  34


    Table of Contents

    compensation at the median of its insurance industry peer group. Mr. Wilson's total target direct compensation has historically been significantly below the 50th50th percentile of our peer group. Because of Mr. Wilson's leadership responsibilities, experience, and ultimate accountability for company performance, the Committee set a higher level of target total direct compensation for him than for other executive officers.

    Salary.  In 2012, the Committee did not adjust Mr. Wilson's annual base salary of $1,100,000, which was effective in March 2010.

    Annual Incentive Award.  SinceDuring the 2013 annual review, the Committee determined that no adjustments were necessary to Mr. Wilson's total target direct compensation was well below the guideline of the 50th percentile of our peer group, the Committee approved an increase to his annual incentive award target for 2012 from 200% to 300% of base salary. The Committee also reduced the maximum opportunity for Mr. Wilson from 250% of target to 200% of target. Mr. Wilson's impact on overall returns included the following:

    Under Mr. Wilson's leadership, in 2012 Allstate delivered on its strategy to provide differentiated products to four consumer segments while improving returns. An increase in overall premiums and a doubling of net and operating income in 2012 versus 2011 resulted in a strong year.

    Allstate Protection maintained strong auto profitability, dramatically improved returns in homeowners, and began to reduce the negative impact on policies in force related to profit improvement actions.

    Allstate Financial's strategic shift to underwritten products continued to provide strong results.

    Allstate Investments proactive investment actions continued to produce solid total returns despite the low interest rate environment,

      The Committee approved an annual cash incentive award of $6,164,730 for Mr. Wilson based on its assessment of his performance in improving overall returns.

      Under the new target and reduced maximum, the payout was $6,164,730, while under the old methodology it would have been $5,046,360. The new target resulted in an increase of $1,118,370.

    Equity Incentive Awards.  The Committee adjusted the target equity incentive award opportunity for Mr. Wilson in 2012 from 600% to 700% of base salary. The Committee granted equity awards of stock options with a grant date fair value of $3,850,000 and performance stock awards with a grant date fair value of $3,850,014, reflecting Mr. Wilson's target equity incentive award opportunity.

    Target Total Direct Compensation.  The Committee continues to review Mr. Wilson's target total direct compensation against the benchmark guideline of the 50th percentile of our peers. Mr. Wilson's salary, annual cash incentive target of 300% of salary, and long-term equity incentive target of 700% of salary places his target total direct compensation at approximately the 50th50th percentile of our peer group.

    Salary.  In 2013, the Board did not adjust Mr. Wilson's annual salary of $1,100,000, which was effective in March 2010.

    Annual Cash Incentive Award.  Mr. Wilson's target annual incentive payment of 300% of base salary with a maximum pool funding of 200% of target was unchanged in 2013.

    Under Mr. Wilson's leadership, Allstate delivered on its strategy to provide differentiated products to four consumer segments while improving returns. An increase in overall premiums and a 24.3% increase in operating income were among the measures of success in 2013.

    Allstate Protection maintained strong auto profitability, grew policies in force, and benefited from dramatically improved returns in homeowners.

    Allstate Financial's strategic shift to underwritten products continued to benefit results. As of March 15, 2014, the divestiture of Lincoln Benefit Life Company was pending regulatory approval.

    Allstate Investments proactive portfolio management continued to produce solid returns despite the low interest rate environment.

    Total cash returns to shareholders in 2013 included $352 million of dividends and $1.8 billion of share repurchases, representing 9.4% of the average market capitalization for the year.

        The Committee approved an annual cash incentive award of $6,600,000 for Mr. Wilson based on its assessment of his performance in improving overall returns in 2013. This was in-line with the corporate pool funding at 200% of target. No positive discretion was utilized.

      Equity Incentive Awards.  In February 2013, based on its assessment of Mr. Wilson's performance in delivering strong business results in 2012, the Committee granted him equity awards of stock options with a grant date fair value of $4,350,006 and PSAs with a grant date fair value of $3,849,986, which was above Mr. Wilson's target equity incentive award opportunity of 700% of salary.

    Other Named Executives

    After year-end, Mr. Wilson evaluatedevaluates the performance and contributions of each member of his senior leadership team, including each of the other named executive.executives. Based on his review, Mr. Wilson recommendedrecommends specific adjustments to salary and incentive targets as well as actual incentive awards. The recommendations wereare considered and approved by the Committee.

    Mr. Shebik, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

    Salary.  The Committee approved a promotional increase from $382,000 to $550,000 to reflectIn 2013, the Board did not adjust Mr. Shebik's expanded job scope and responsibilities as he became Chief Financial Officer,annual salary of $600,000, which was effective February 27,in July 2012. The Committee approved an additional salary increase from $550,000 to $600,000, effective July 29, 2012, based on his salary relative to our peer group.

    Incentive Targets.  In recognition of his promotion and increased job scope and responsibilities, the Committee approved an increase in Mr. Shebik's target annual incentive award opportunity from 60%No changes were made to 90% of salary and an increase in his target equity incentive award opportunity from 120% to 250% of salary. To align Mr. Shebik's incentive award targets with our peer group, the Committee approved an increase in his targetduring 2013. Mr. Shebik's annual incentive award opportunity from 90% totarget was 110% of salary and an increase in histhe target equity incentive award opportunity from 250% towas 300% of salary.



    The Allstate Corporation  |  

    38


    Table of Contents

    Annual Cash Incentive Award.  Under Mr. Shebik's leadership, the organization delivered strong corporate operating results and continued to demonstrate excellent proactive capital management. The Committee approved an annual cash incentive award of $1,175,994

    35  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

      $2,100,000 for Mr. Shebik based on its assessment of his performance in establishing and executing against our customer value propositions, delivering improved returns, and driving excellent capital management results.



    Equity Incentive Awards.  In February 2013, based on a review of Mr. Shebik's performance during 2012, Mr. Shebik was granted stock options with a grant date fair value of $229,287 and restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $229,283, reflecting his target equity incentive award opportunity. Thethe Committee granted a promotional award to Mr. Shebik of stock options with a grant date fair value of $301,821 and performance stockhim equity awards with a grant date fair value of $301,816.$1,800,022 aligned with his target equity incentive award opportunity.

    Mr. Civgin, President and Chief Executive Officer, Allstate Financial

    Salary.  The Committee approved an increase from $635,000 to $685,000 based on a combination ofBoard did not adjust Mr. Civgin's individual performance in 2011 andannual salary market positioning of chief financial officers relative to peer chief financial officers. The Committee approved a promotional increase from $685,000 to $700,000 to reflect expanded job scope and responsibilities as he was promoted from Chief Financial Officer to President and Chief Executive Officer of Allstate Financial, effective February 27, 2012.during 2013.

    Incentive Targets.  The Committee approved an increase inNo changes were made to Mr. Civgin's targetincentive targets during 2013. Mr. Civgin's annual incentive award opportunity from 110% totarget was 125% of salary in recognition of his promotion and increased job scope and responsibilities. Mr. Civgin'sthe target equity incentive award opportunity ofwas 300% of salary did not change.salary.

    Annual Cash Incentive Award.  Under Mr. Civgin's leadership, Allstate Financial continued its strategy to grow underwritten products sold through Allstate agenciesAgencies, shifted capital to align with company strategy, and Allstate Benefits, further reduce its concentration in spread-based products, and improve returns.announced a definitive agreement to sell Lincoln Benefit Life Company. Allstate Financial operating results in 20122013 were all above target levels. Additionally, under Mr. Civgin's leadership,levels, while Esurance achieved strong growth and achieved the benefits assumed in our acquisition economics.continued to grow. The Committee approved an annual cash incentive award of $2,000,000 for Mr. Civgin based on its assessment of his performance in delivering strong operating results at Allstate Financial and deliveringcontinuing to deliver on the growth and operating goals at Esurance.

    Equity Incentive Awards.  BasedIn February 2013, based on the Committee's evaluationa review of Mr. Civgin's performance during 2011,in 2012, the Committee granted him stock options with a grant date fair value of $949,998 and performance stockequity awards with a grant date fair value of $949,995, reflecting$2,099,984 aligned with his target equity incentive award opportunity.

    Ms. Greffin, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Allstate Insurance Company

    Salary.  The CommitteeBoard approved an increase from $590,000$610,000 to $610,000$640,000 effective March 2013, based on a combination of Ms. Greffin's individual performance in 2011 and salary market positioning relative to our peer group.and performance.

    Incentive Targets.  No changes were made to Ms. Greffin's incentive targets.targets during 2013. Ms. Greffin's target annual incentive opportunitytarget was 110% of salary and the target equity incentive award opportunity was 300% of salary.

    Annual Cash Incentive Award.  Under Ms. Greffin's leadership, Allstate Investments delivered net investment income well above plan and executedcontinued to develop its strategy of creating a fundamental change to thenew risk profile through shifting asset allocations to capture a better risk adjusted return. In addition, Allstate Investments began implementing a strategic plan to significantly reduce interest rate risk. The Committee approved an annual cash incentive award of $1,700,000$1,400,000 for Ms. Greffin based on its assessment of her performance in generating investment income and total returns in a challenging interest rate environment.performance.

    Equity Incentive Awards.  BasedIn February 2013, based on the Committee's evaluationa review of Ms. Greffin's performance during 2011,in 2012, the Committee granted her stock options with a grant date fair value of $899,998 and performance stockequity awards with a grant date fair value of $899,992,$1,829,981 reflecting her target equity incentive award opportunity.

    Mr. Gupta,Winter, Executive Vice President, — Technology & Operations of Allstate Insurance CompanyPersonal Lines

    Salary.  The Committee approvedBoard awarded an increase from $525,000$725,000 to $540,000$750,000, effective March 2013, based on a combination of Mr. Gupta's individualWinter's performance in 20112012 and salary market positioning relative to our peer group.positioning.

    Incentive Targets.  No changes were made to Mr. Gupta'sWinter's incentive targets.targets during 2013. Mr. Gupta's targetWinter's annual incentive opportunitytarget was 90%150% of salary and the target equity incentive award opportunity was 250%350% of salary.

    Annual Incentive Award.  Mr. Gupta has continued to improve the capabilities and organizational alignment of the technology and operating functions which serve Allstate. Under his leadership, Allstate expanded the footprint of our technology resources and improved the

    The Allstate Corporation  --  36


    Table of Contents

      technology development, testing, and deployment processes at Allstate. The Committee approved an annual cash incentive award of $1,209,822 for Mr. Gupta based on its assessment of his performance in delivering excellent operating results, enhancing customer service, and managing expenses related to information technology and operations infrastructure.

    Equity Incentive Awards.  Based on the Committee's evaluation of Mr. Gupta's performance during 2011, the Committee granted him stock options with a grant date fair value of $656,250 and performance stock awards with a grant date fair value of $656,239, reflecting his target equity incentive award opportunity.

    Sign-On Awards.  The Committee approved $750,000 in cash, $350,000 payable within 30 days of his 2011 start date and the remainder payable on January 31, 2012, with a 24-month clawback for voluntary termination, to replace unvested equity awards he forfeited with his previous employer.

    Mr. Winter, President, Allstate Auto, Home, and Agencies

    Salary.  The Committee approved an increase from $700,000 to $725,000, effective February 27, 2012, to reflect expanded job scope and responsibilities as Mr. Winter became President, Allstate Auto, Home, and Agencies.

    Incentive Targets.  The Committee approved an increase in Mr. Winter's target annual incentive award opportunity from 125% to 150% of salary in recognition of increased job scope and responsibilities. Mr. Winter's target equity incentive award opportunity of 350% of salary did not change.

    AnnualCash Incentive Award.  Under Mr. Winter's leadership, Allstate Auto, Home and AgenciesPersonal Lines continued to deliver on its strategy to offerof offering unique products to our different consumer segments while achieving its priorities of maintaining auto margins, improving homeownerincreasing homeowners' returns, and growing insurance premiums. Allstate Auto, Home and AgenciesPersonal Lines delivered strong combined ratio results in auto and homeowners and an underlying combined ratio better than the outlook range set at the beginning of the year.exceeded growth plans. The Committee approved an annual cash incentive award of $3,000,000 for Mr. Winter based on its assessment of his performance in delivering strong operating metrics, expanding the product platform for our customers, and enhancing the relationships with our agents.agents, and increasing retention rates by building a customer-focused culture.

    Equity Incentive Awards.  BasedIn February 2013, based on the Committee's evaluationa review of Mr. Winter's performance during 2011,2012, the Committee granted him stock options with a grant date fair value of $1,249,997 and performance stockequity awards with a grant date fair value of $1,250,013, reflecting$2,537,481 aligned with his target equity incentive award opportunity.

    39  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


      Other Elements of Compensation

      To remain competitive with other employers and to attract, retain, and motivate highly talented executives and other employees, we provide the benefits listed in the following table.

    Benefit or Perquisite
    Named
    Executives

    Other
    Officers
    and Certain
    Managers

    All Full-time
    and Regular
    Part-time
    Employees

    401(k)(1) and defined benefit pension

    Supplemental retirement benefit

      

    Health and welfare benefits(2)

    Supplemental long term disabilityPROXY STATEMENT

    Deferred compensation

    Tax preparation and financial planning services


     (3)Compensation Committee Report  

    Mobile phones, ground transportation, and personal use of aircraft(4)

    (1)
    Allstate contributed $.74 for every dollar of basic pre-tax deposits made in 2012 (up to 5% of eligible pay).

    (2)
    Including medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment, long term disability, and group legal insurance.

    37  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    (3)
    All officers are eligible for tax preparation services. Financial planning services were provided only to senior executives.

    (4)
    Ground transportation is available to senior executives only. In limited circumstances approved by the CEO, senior executives are permitted to use our corporate aircraft for personal purposes. Mobile phones are available to senior executives, other officers, certain managers, and certain employees depending on their job responsibilities.

      Retirement Benefits

    Each named executive participates in two different defined benefit pension plans. The Allstate Retirement Plan (ARP) is a tax qualified defined benefit pension plan available to all of our regular full-time and regular part-time employees who meet certain age and service requirements. The ARP provides an assured retirement income based on an employee's level of compensation and length of service at no cost to the employee. As the ARP is a tax qualified plan, federal tax law limits (1) the amount of an individual's compensation that can be used to calculate plan benefits and (2) the total amount of benefits payable to a plan participant on an annual basis. For certain employees, these limits may result in a lower benefit under the ARP than would have been payable otherwise. Therefore, the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (SRIP) was formed to provide ARP-eligible employees whose compensation or benefit amount exceeds the federal limits with an additional defined benefit in an amount equal to what would have been payable under the ARP if the federal limits did not exist.

      Change-in-Control and Post-Termination Benefits

    Consistent with our compensation objectives, we offer these benefits to attract, motivate, and retain highly talented executives. A change-in-control of Allstate could have a disruptive impact on both Allstate and our executives. Change-in-control benefits and post-termination benefits are designed to mitigate that impact and to maintain alignment between the interests of our executives and our stockholders.

    We substantially reduced change-in-control benefits in 2011. The named executives who had previously been parties to certain change-in-control agreements agreed to become participants in a new change-in-control severance plan (CIC Plan). Compared with the previous arrangements, the CIC Plan eliminates all excise tax gross ups; eliminates the lump sum cash pension enhancement based on additional years of age, service, and compensation; and reduces for named executives other than the CEO the amount of cash severance payable from three to two times the sum of base salary and target annual incentive. In order to receive the cash severance benefits under the CIC Plan following a change-in-control, a participant must have been terminated (other than for cause, death, or disability) or the participant must have terminated employment for good reason (such as adverse changes in the terms or conditions of employment, including a material reduction in base compensation, a material change in authority, duties, or responsibilities, or a material change in job location) within two years following a change-in-control. In addition, long-term equity incentive awards granted after 2011 will vest on an accelerated basis due to a change-in-control only if either Allstate terminates the executive's employment (other than for cause, death, or disability) or the executive terminates his or her employment for good reason within two years after the change-in-control (so-called "double-trigger" vesting).

    The change-in-control and post-termination arrangements which are described in thePotential Payments as a Result of Termination or Change-in-Control section are not provided exclusively to the named executives. A larger group of management employees is eligible to receive many of the post-termination benefits described in that section.

      Stock Ownership Guidelines

    Because we believe management's interests must be linked with those of our stockholders, we instituted stock ownership guidelines in 1996 that require each of the named executives to own Allstate common stock worth a multiple of base salary. We adjusted the stock ownership guidelines to accommodate the shift to performance stock awards beginning in 2012. The new guidelines provide that an executive must hold 75% of net after-tax shares received as a result of equity compensation awards until his or her salary multiple guideline is met. The chart

    The Allstate Corporation  --  38


    Table of Contents

    below shows the salary multiple guidelines and the equity holdings that count towards the requirement.

    Name
    Guideline
    Status
    Mr. Wilson6x salaryü Meets guideline
    Mr. Shebik3x salaryü Meets guideline
    Mr. Civgin3x salaryü Meets guideline
    Ms. Greffin3x salaryü Meets guideline
    Mr. Gupta3x salaryMust hold 75% of net after-tax shares until guideline is met
    Mr. Winter3x salaryMust hold 75% of net after-tax shares until guideline is met


    What Counts Toward the GuidelineWhat Does not Count Toward the Guideline

    Allstate shares owned personally

    Shares held in the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan

    Restricted stock units

    Unexercised stock options

    Performance stock awards

    We also have a policy on insider trading that prohibits all officers, directors, and employees from engaging in transactions in securities issued by Allstate or any of its subsidiaries that might be considered speculative or hedging, such as selling short or buying or selling options.


    Impact of Tax Considerations on Compensation

    We may take a tax deduction of no more than $1 million per executive for compensation paid in any year to our CEO and the three other most highly compensated executives, excluding any individual that served as CFO during the year, as of the last day of the fiscal year in which the compensation is paid, unless the compensation meets specific standards. We may deduct more than $1 million in compensation if the standards are met, including that the compensation is performance-based and paid under a plan that meets certain requirements. The Committee considers the impact of this rule in developing, implementing, and administering our compensation programs. However, the Committee balances this consideration with our primary goal of structuring compensation programs to attract, motivate, and retain highly talented executives.

    Our compensation programs are designed and administered so that payments to affected executives can be fully deductible. However, in light of the balance mentioned above and the need to maintain flexibility in administering compensation programs, we may authorize compensation in any year that exceeds $1 million and does not meet the required standards for deductibility. The amount of compensation paid in 2012 that was not deductible for tax purposes was $3,106,436.


    Compensation Committee Report

    The Compensation and Succession Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained on pages 25 through 3924-39 of this proxy statement, with management and, basedstatement. Based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

    THE COMPENSATION AND SUCCESSION COMMITTEE

    W. James FarrellJack M. Greenberg (Chairman)
    Robert D. Beyer
    Jack M. Greenberg
    Ronald T. LeMayHerbert L. Henkel
     Andrea Redmond
    John W. Rowe
    Joshua I. Smith
    Andrea Redmond

    39  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  40


    Table of Contents

      Executive Compensation — Tables 



    Executive Compensation Tables


    PROXY STATEMENT


          


    SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    The following table summarizes the compensation of the named executives for the last three fiscal years.

    Name and Principal Position(1)
     Year
     Salary
    ($)

     Bonus
    ($)

     Stock
    Awards
    ($)(2)

     Option
    Awards
    ($)(3)

     Non-Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Compensation
    ($)

     Change in
    Pension Value
    and
    Nonqualified
    Deferred
    Compensation
    Earnings
    ($)(4)

     All
    Other
    Compensation
    ($)(5)

     Total
    ($)

      Year
     Salary
    ($)

     Bonus
    ($)

     Stock
    Awards
    ($)(2)

     Option
    Awards
    ($)(3)

     Non-Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Compensation
    ($)

     Change in
    Pension Value
    and
    Nonqualified
    Deferred
    Compensation
    Earnings
    ($)(4)

     All
    Other
    Compensation
    ($)(5)

     Total
    ($)

     
       
    Thomas J. Wilson  
    (Chairman, President 2012 1,100,000  3,850,014 3,850,000 6,164,730 1,982,607(6) 111,204 17,058,555  2013 1,100,000  3,849,986 4,350,006 6,600,000 2,720,160(6) 53,571 18,673,723 
    and Chief Executive 2011 1,100,000  2,310,005 4,290,001 2,252,800 1,157,562 69,448 11,179,816  2012 1,100,000  3,850,014 3,850,000 6,164,730 1,982,607 111,204 17,058,555 
    Officer) 2010 1,093,846  2,225,995 4,134,002 1,091,096 679,359 75,322 9,299,620  2011 1,100,000  2,310,005 4,290,001 2,252,800 1,157,562 69,448 11,179,816 
       
    Steven E. Shebik  
    (Executive Vice President and 
    Chief Financial Officer) 2012 545,330  531,099 531,108 1,175,994 563,812(7) 33,904 3,381,247 

    (Executive Vice

     

    President and Chief

     2013 600,000  900,022 900,000 2,100,000 1,070,582(7) 34,165 5,604,769 

    Financial Officer)

     2012 545,330  531,099 531,108 1,175,994 563,812 33,904 3,381,247 
       
    Don Civgin  
    (President and Chief 2012 690,000  949,995 949,998 2,000,000 48,581(8) 28,302 4,666,876  2013 700,000  1,049,988 1,049,996 2,000,000 69,422(8) 27,902 4,897,308 
    Executive Officer 2011 624,231  594,998 1,104,996 750,000 29,270 23,532 3,127,027 

    Executive Officer,

     2012 690,000  949,995 949,998 2,000,000 48,581 28,302 4,666,876 
    Allstate Financial) 2010 562,692  596,759 1,108,246 400,000 20,648 27,013 2,715,358  2011 624,231  594,998 1,104,996 750,000 29,270 23,532 3,127,027 
       
    Judith P. Greffin  
    (Executive Vice 2012 606,538  899,992 899,998 1,700,000 952,989(9) 25,450 5,084,967  2013 634,807  914,982 914,999 1,400,000 271,815(9) 33,580 4,170,183 
    President and Chief 2011 577,692  535,486 994,500 750,000 616,936 32,156 3,506,770  2012 606,538  899,992 899,998 1,700,000 952,989 25,450 5,084,967 
    Investment Officer) 2010 502,684  485,567 901,771 230,526 397,608 30,890 2,549,046  2011 577,692  535,486 994,500 750,000 616,936 32,156 3,506,770 
       
    Suren K. Gupta 
    (Executive Vice 
    President—Technology & 2012 537,404 400,000(10) 656,239 656,250 1,209,822 11,519(11) 72,944 3,544,178 
    Operations) 2011 383,654 350,000(10) 674,991�� 975,004 500,000 0 18,896 2,902,545 
     
    Matthew E. Winter  2013 745,673  1,268,733 1,268,748 3,000,000 102,174(10) 35,150 6,420,478 
    (President, Allstate 2012 721,154  1,250,013 1,249,997 3,000,000 52,425(12) 37,400 6,310,989  2012 721,154  1,250,013 1,249,997 3,000,000 52,425 37,400 6,310,989 
    Auto, Home, and 2011 654,231  770,012 1,429,997 1,000,000 48,100 44,180 3,946,520 
    Agencies) 2010 600,000  734,994 1,365,002 1,212,300 3,833 35,159 3,951,288 

    Personal Lines)

     2011 654,231  770,012 1,429,997 1,000,000 48,100 44,180 3,946,520 
       
    (1)
    Mr. Shebik was not a named executive for 2010 and 2011 and Mr. Gupta was not a named executive for 2010.in 2011.

    (2)
    The aggregate grant date fair value of performance stock awardsPSAs granted in 2013 and 2012 and restricted stock units awards granted in 2012 2011, and 20102011 are computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (ASC 718). The fair value of PSAs and RSUs is based on the final closing price of Allstate's stock as of the grant date, which in part reflects the payment of expected future dividends. (See note 1819 to our audited financial statements for 2012.2013.) This amount reflects an accounting expense and does not correspond to actual value that will be realized by the named executives. The value forof PSAs is based on the probable satisfaction of the performance conditions. The number of PSAs granted in 20122013 to each named executive is provided in theGrants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 42.43. The value of the PSAs granted in 2013 at grant date share price if maximum corporate performance were to be achieved is as follows: Mr. Wilson $7,700,028,$7,699,972, Mr. Shebik $603,632,$1,800,044, Mr. Civgin $1,899,990,$2,099,976, Ms. Greffin $1,799,984, Mr. Gupta $1,312,478,$1,829,964, and Mr. Winter $2,500,026.$2,537,466.

    (3)
    The aggregate grant date fair value of option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a binomial lattice model and the assumptions (see note 19 to our audited financial statements for 2013) as set forth in the following table:

      
     2012
     2011
     2010
      
     

    Weighted average expected term

     9.0 years 7.9 years 7.8 years
     

    Expected volatility

     20.2 - 53.9% 22.1 - 53.9% 23.7 - 52.3%
     

    Weighted average volatility

     34.6% 35.1% 35.1%
     

    Expected dividends

     2.2 - 3.0% 2.5 - 3.7% 2.4 - 2.8%
     

    Weighted average expected dividends

     2.8% 2.7% 2.6%
     

    Risk-free rate

     0.0 - 2.2% 0.0 - 3.5% 0.1 - 3.9%
      
     2013
     2012
     2011
      
     

    Weighted average expected term

     8.2 years 9.0 years 7.9 years
     

    Expected volatility

     19.1 - 48.1% 20.2 - 53.9% 22.1 - 53.9%
     

    Weighted average volatility

     31.0% 34.6% 35.1%
     

    Expected dividends

     1.9 - 2.2% 2.2 - 3.0% 2.5 - 3.7%
     

    Weighted average expected dividends

     2.2% 2.8% 2.7%
     

    Risk-free rate

     0.0 - 2.9% 0.0 - 2.2% 0.0 - 3.5%

    The Allstate Corporation  --  40


    Table of Contents


    (See note 18 to our audited financial statements for 2012.) This amount reflects an accounting expense and does not correspond to actual value that will be realized by the named executives. The number of options granted in 20122013 to each named executive is provided in theGrants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 42.

    43.

    41  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    (4)
    Amounts reflect the aggregate increase in actuarial value of the pension benefits as set forth in thePension Benefits table, accrued during 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010.2011. These are benefits under the Allstate Retirement Plan (ARP) and the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (SRIP). Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings are not reflected since our Deferred Compensation Plan does not provide above-market earnings. The pension plan measurement date is December 31. (See note 1718 to our audited financial statements for 2012.2013.) Beginning in 2014, all eligible employees will earn future pension benefits under a new cash balance formula only. As a result, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Shebik, and Ms. Greffin will experience a significant reduction in their future pension accruals.

    (5)
    TheAll Other Compensation for 2012—2013 — Supplemental Table provides details regarding the amounts for 20122013 for this column.

    (6)
    Reflects the increase in the actuarial value of the benefits provided to Mr. Wilson under the ARP and SRIP of $177,375$18,553 and $1,805,232$2,701,607 respectively. The increases resulted from $624,921 of accrual for one year with the remaining increase due to changes in the discount and interest rates and one year of interest.

    (7)
    Reflects the increase in the actuarial value of the benefits provided to Mr. Shebik under the ARP and SRIP of $204,087$28,707 and $359,725$1,041,875 respectively. The increases resulted from $181,129 of accrual for one year with the remaining increase due to changes in the discount and interest rates and one year of interest.

    (8)
    Reflects the increase in the actuarial value of the benefits provided to Mr. Civgin under the ARP and SRIP of $8,884$5,444 and $39,697$63,978 respectively. The increases resulted from $38,944 of annual pay credit and one year of interest with the remaining increase due to changes in the discount and interest rates.

    (9)
    Reflects the increasechange in the actuarial value of the benefits provided to Ms. Greffin under the ARP and SRIP of $200,601-$8,612 and $752,388$280,427 respectively. The increases resulted from $149,622 of accrual for one year with the remaining increase due to changes in the discount and interest rates and one year of interest.

    (10)
    As part of his sign-on bonus in 2011, Mr. Gupta received $750,000 in cash, $350,000 payable within 30 days of his start date and the remainder payable on January 31, 2012. If Mr. Gupta voluntarily terminates his employment within 24 months of his hiring date, this bonus must be fully reimbursed to Allstate.

    (11)
    Reflects the increase in the actuarial benefit provided to Mr. Gupta under the SRIP of $11,519. The increase resulted from $10,479 of annual pay credit and one year of interest with the remaining increase due to changes in the discount and interest rates.

    (12)
    Reflects the increase in the actuarial value of the benefits provided to Mr. Winter under the ARP and SRIP of $7,522$6,588 and $44,903$95,586 respectively. The increases resulted from $45,847 of annual pay credit and one year of interest with the remaining increase due to changes in the discount and interest rates.


    ALL OTHER COMPENSATION FOR 20122013 — SUPPLEMENTAL TABLE
    (In dollars)

    The following table describes the incremental cost of other benefits provided in 20122013 that are included in the "All Other Compensation" column.

    Name
     Personal
    Use of
    Aircraft(1)

     401(k)
    Match(2)

     Other(3)
     Total
    All Other
    Compensation

      Personal
    Use of
    Aircraft(1)

     401(k)
    Match(2)

     Other(3)
     Total
    All Other
    Compensation

     
       

    Mr. Wilson

     67,032 9,250 34,922 111,204  16,609 7,140 29,822 53,571 
       

    Mr. Shebik

     0 9,250 24,654 33,904  0 7,140 27,025 34,165 
       

    Mr. Civgin

     0 9,250 19,052 28,302  0 7,140 20,762 27,902 
       

    Ms. Greffin

     0 9,250 16,200 25,450  0 7,140 26,440 33,580 
       

    Mr. Gupta

     0 3,700 69,244 72,944 
     

    Mr. Winter

     0 9,250 28,150 37,400  0 7,140 28,010 35,150 
       
    (1)
    The amount reported for personal use of aircraft is based on the incremental cost method, which is calculated based on Allstate's average variable costs per flight hour. Variable costs include fuel, maintenance, on-board catering, landing/ramp fees, and other miscellaneous variable costs. The total annual variable costs are divided by the annual number of flight hours flown by the aircraft to derive an average variable cost per flight hour. This average variable

    41  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

      cost per flight hour is then multiplied by the flight hours flown for personal use to derive the incremental cost. This method of calculating the incremental cost excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilots' and other employees' salaries, costs incurred in purchasing the aircraft, and non-trip related hangar expenses.



    (2)
    Each of the named executives participated in our 401(k) plan during 2012.2013. The amount shown is the amount allocated to their accounts as employer matching contributions.

    (3)
    "Other" consists of premiums for group life insurance and personal benefits and perquisites consisting of mobile phones,devices, tax preparation services, financial planning, ground transportation, and supplemental long-term disability coverage, and for Mr. Gupta, $48,132 for reimbursement of taxes related to relocation expenses. (Tax assistance for certain relocation benefits is a standard component of our relocation program available to all employees.) Mr. Gupta also received amounts for relocation that are not reflected in other compensation because they are part of the standard relocation package available to all employees.coverage. There was no incremental cost for the use of mobile phones.devices. We provide supplemental long-term disability coverage to all regular full-timefull- and regular part-time employees who participate in the

    The Allstate Corporation  |  42


    Table of Contents

      long-term disability plan and whose annual earnings exceed the level which produces the maximum monthly benefit provided by the long-term disability plan. This coverage is self-insured (funded and paid for by Allstate when obligations are incurred). No obligations for the named executives were incurred in 2012,2013, and therefore, no incremental cost is reflected in the table.


    GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 20122013(1)

    The following table provides information about non-equity incentive plan awards and equity awards granted to our named executives during fiscal year 2012.2013.

      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
     All
    Other
    Stock
    Awards:
    Number
    of
    Shares
    of Stock
    or Units
    (#)

      
      
      
      
     
      
      
     Date of
    Committee
    Action
    for Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards

      
      
      
      
      
      
      
     All Other
    Option
    Awards:
    Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Options
    (#)

      
      
      
     
      
      
      
     Estimated Future Payouts
    Under Non-Equity Incentive
    Plan Awards(2)
     Estimated Future Payouts
    Under Equity Incentive
    Plan Awards(3)
     Exercise
    or Base
    Price of
    Option
    Awards
    ($/Shr)(4)

     Grant Date
    Fair Value ($)(5)
     
     Name
     Grant
    Date

     Plan Name
     Threshold
    ($)

     Target
    ($)

     Maximum
    ($)

     Threshold
    (#)

     Target
    (#)

     Maximum
    (#)

     Stock
    Awards

     Option
    Awards

     
       
     Mr. Wilson   Annual cash incentive  1,650,000  3,300,000  8,500,000                         
       3/6/2012 3/6/2012 Performance stock awards           0  124,194  248,388           3,850,014    
       2/21/2012 2/20/2012 Stock options                       444,060  31.56     3,850,000 
       
     Mr. Shebik   Annual cash incentive  256,033  512,065  5,527,500                         
       3/6/2012 3/6/2012 Performance stock awards           0  9,736  19,472           301,816    
       3/6/2012 3/6/2012 Stock options                       35,014  31.00     301,821 
       2/21/2012 2/20/2012 Restricted stock units                    7,265        229,283    
       2/21/2012 2/20/2012 Stock options                       26,446  31.56     229,287 
       
     Mr. Civgin   Annual cash incentive  423,315  846,630  5,527,500                         
       3/6/2012 3/6/2012 Performance stock awards           0  30,645  61,290           949,995    
       2/21/2012 2/20/2012 Stock options                       109,573  31.56     949,998 
       
     Ms. Greffin   Annual cash incentive  333,596  667,192  5,527,500                         
       3/6/2012 3/6/2012 Performance stock awards           0  29,032  58,064           899,992    
       2/21/2012 2/20/2012 Stock options                       103,806  31.56     899,998 
       
     Mr. Gupta   Annual cash incentive  241,832  483,663  5,527,500                         
       3/6/2012 3/6/2012 Performance stock awards           0  21,169  42,338           656,239    
       2/21/2012 2/20/2012 Stock options                       75,692  31.56     656,250 
       
     Mr. Winter   Annual cash incentive  527,164  1,054,327  5,527,500                         
       3/6/2012 3/6/2012 Performance stock awards           0  40,323  80,646           1,250,013    
       2/21/2012 2/20/2012 Stock options                       144,175  31.56     1,249,997 
       
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
     All Other
    Option
    Awards:
    Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Options
    (#)

      
      
      
     
      
      
      
     Estimated Future Payouts
    Under Non-Equity Incentive
    Plan Awards(2)
     Estimated Future Payouts
    Under Equity Incentive
    Plan Awards(3)
     Exercise
    or Base
    Price of
    Option
    Awards
    ($/Shr)(4)

     Grant Date
    Fair Value ($)(5)
     
     Name
     Grant Date
     Plan Name
     Threshold
    ($)

     Target
    ($)

     Maximum
    ($)

     Threshold
    (#)

     Target
    (#)

     Maximum
    (#)

     Stock
    Awards

     Option
    Awards

     
       
     Mr. Wilson   Annual cash incentive  1,650,000  3,300,000  8,500,000                      
        2/12/2013 Performance stock awards           0  84,411  168,822        3,849,986    
        2/12/2013 Stock options                    363,409  45.61     4,350,006 
       
     Mr. Shebik   Annual cash incentive  330,000  660,000  5,458,500                      
        2/12/2013 Performance stock awards           0  19,733  39,466        900,022    
        2/12/2013 Stock options                    75,188  45.61     900,000 
       
     Mr. Civgin   Annual cash incentive  437,500  875,000  5,458,500                      
        2/12/2013 Performance stock awards           0  23,021  46,042        1,049,988    
        2/12/2013 Stock options                    87,719  45.61     1,049,996 
       
     Ms. Greffin   Annual cash incentive  349,144  698,288  5,458,500                      
        2/12/2013 Performance stock awards           0  20,061  40,122        914,982    
        2/12/2013 Stock options                    76,441  45.61     914,999 
       
     Mr. Winter   Annual cash incentive  559,255  1,118,510  5,458,500                      
        2/12/2013 Performance stock awards           0  27,817  55,634        1,268,733    
        2/12/2013 Stock options                    105,994  45.61     1,268,748 
       
    (1)
    Awards under the Annual Executive Incentive Plan and the 20092013 Equity Incentive Plan.

    (2)
    The amounts in these columns consist of the threshold, target, and maximum annual cash incentive awards for the named executives. The threshold amount for each named executive is 50% of target, as the minimum amount payable if threshold performance is achieved. If the threshold is not achieved, the payment to named executives would be zero. The target amount is based upon achievement of the performance measures listed under theAnnual Cash Incentive Awards caption on pages 31-32.page 35. The maximum amount payable to any named executive who served as CFO during the year is an amount equal to 15% of the award pool. The maximum amount payable to the CEO and the three most highly compensated executives, excluding any named executive who served as CFO during the year, is the lesser of a stockholder approved maximum of $8.5 million under the Annual Executive Incentive Plan or a percentage, which varies by executive, of the award

    The Allstate Corporation  --  42


    Table of Contents

      pool. The award pool is equal to 1.0% of Adjusted Operating Income with award opportunities capped at 40% of the pool for Mr. Wilson and 15% of the pool for each other such named executive. Adjusted Operating incomeIncome is defined on page 56.

    pages 58-59.

    (3)
    The amounts shown in these columns reflect the threshold, target, and maximum performance stock awardsPSAs for the named executives. The threshold amount for each named executive is 0% payout. The target and maximum amounts are based upon achievement of the performance measures listed under thePerformance Stock Awards caption on pages 32-33.page 36.

    (4)
    The exercise price of each option is equal to the fair market value of Allstate's common stock on the grant date. Fair market value is equal to the closing sale price on the grant date or, if there was no such sale on the grant date, then on the last previous day on which there was a sale.

    (5)
    The aggregate grant date fair value of the March 6, 2012, performance stock awardsFebruary 12, 2013, PSAs was $31.00$45.61 and stock option award was $8.62,$11.97, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 based on the probable satisfaction of the performance conditions. The aggregate grant date fair value of the February 21, 2012, restricted stock units was $31.56 and the stock option awards was $8.67, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The assumptions used in the valuation are discussed in footnotes 2 and 3 to theSummary Compensation Table on page 40.41.

    Stock options represent an opportunity to buy shares of our stock at a fixed exercise price at a future date. We use them to align the interests of our executives with long-term stockholder value, as the stock price must appreciate from the grant date for the executives to profit.

    Under our stockholder-approved equity incentive plan, the exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value of a share on the grant date. Stock option repricing is not permitted. In other words, without an event such as a stock split, if the Committee cancels an award and substitutes a new award, the exercise price of the new award cannot be less than the exercise price of the cancelled award.

    All stock option awards have been made in the form of nonqualified stock options. The options granted to the named executives in 20122013 become exercisable over four years: 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates, and expire in ten years, except in certain change-in-control situations or under other special circumstances approved by the Committee.

    Performance stock awards (PSAs)PSAs represent our promise to transfer shares of common stock in the future if certain performance measures are met. Each PSA represents Allstate's promise to transfer one fully vested share in the future for each PSA that vests. PSAs earned will vest following the end of the three yearthree-year performance cycle, subject to continued employment (other than in the event of death, disability, retirement, or a qualifying termination following a change in control)change-in-control). Vested PSAs will be converted into shares of Allstate common stock and dividend equivalents accrued on these shares will be paid in cash. No dividend equivalents will be paid prior to vesting. Performance stock awards were granted to our senior executives.

    Mr. Shebik was the only named executive to receive an award of restricted stock units in 2012. This award was granted before he became a senior executive. Each restricted stock unit represents our promise to transfer one fully vested share of stock in the future if and when the restrictions expire (when the unit "vests"). Because restricted stock units are based on and payable in stock, they reinforce the alignment of interests of our executives and our stockholders. In addition, restricted stock units provide a retention incentive because they have a real, current value that is forfeited in most circumstances if an executive terminates employment before the restricted stock units vest. Under the terms of the restricted stock unit awards, the executives have only the rights of general unsecured creditors of Allstate and no rights as stockholders until delivery of the underlying shares. The restricted stock units granted to Mr. Shebik in 2012 vest over four years: 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates, except in certain change-in-control situations or under other special circumstances approved by the Committee. The restricted stock units granted to Mr. Shebik in 2012 include the right to receive previously accrued dividend equivalents when the underlying restricted stock unit vests.

    43  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  44


    Table of Contents


    Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 20122013

    The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards of the named executives as of December 31, 2012.2013.

    OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 20122013


     Option Awards(1)
      
      
     Stock Awards
      Option Awards(1)
      
      
     Stock Awards(2)
     
       
    Name
     Option Grant
    Date

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Exercisable(2)

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Unexercisable(3)

     Option
    Exercise
    Price

     Option
    Expiration
    Date

     Stock Award
    Grant Date

     Number of
    Shares or
    Units of
    Stock That
    Have Not
    Vested (#)(4)

     Market Value
    of Shares or
    Units of Stock
    That Have
    Not
    Vested ($)(5)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Number of
    Unearned
    Shares,
    Units, or
    Other
    Rights
    that Have
    Not
    Vested (#)(6)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Market or
    Payout Value
    of Unearned
    Shares, Units,
    or Other
    Rights that
    Have Not
    Vested ($)(5)

      Option Grant
    Date

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Exercisable(3)

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Unexercisable(4)

     Option
    Exercise
    Price

     Option
    Expiration
    Date

     Stock Award
    Grant Date

     Number of
    Shares or
    Units of
    Stock That
    Have Not
    Vested (#)(5)

     Market Value
    of Shares or
    Units of Stock
    That Have
    Not
    Vested ($)(6)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Number of
    Unearned
    Shares,
    Units, or
    Other
    Rights
    that Have
    Not
    Vested (#)(7)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Market or
    Payout Value
    of Unearned
    Shares, Units,
    or Other
    Rights that
    Have Not
    Vested ($)(6)

     
       

    Mr. Wilson

     Feb. 06, 2004 97,100   $45.96 Feb. 06, 2014          Feb. 22, 2005 98,976   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015         

     Feb. 22, 2005 98,976   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015          Jun. 01, 2005 100,000   $58.47 Jun. 01, 2015         

     Jun 01, 2005 100,000   $58.47 Jun 01, 2015          Feb. 21, 2006 66,000   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016         

     Feb. 21, 2006 66,000   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016          Feb. 21, 2006 124,000   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016         

     Feb. 21, 2006 124,000   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016          Feb. 20, 2007 262,335   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017         

     Feb. 20, 2007 262,335   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017          Feb. 26, 2008 338,316   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018         

     Feb. 26, 2008 338,316   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018          Feb. 27, 2009 751,636   $16.83 Feb. 27, 2019         

     Feb. 27, 2009 563,727 187,909 $16.83 Feb. 27, 2019 Feb. 27, 2009 132,264 $5,313,045      Feb. 22, 2010 313,182 104,394 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 17,718 $966,340     

     Feb. 22, 2010 208,788 208,788 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 35,435 $1,423,424      Feb. 22, 2011 223,904 223,904 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 36,390 $1,984,711 ��    

     Feb. 22, 2011 0 447,808 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 72,779 $2,923,532      Feb. 21, 2012 0 444,060 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012 165,592 $9,031,388 41,398 $2,257,847 

     Feb. 21, 2012 0 444,060 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012     124,194 $4,988,873  Feb. 12, 2013 0 363,409 $45.61 Feb. 12, 2023 Feb. 12, 2013 56,274 $3,069,184 56,274 $3,069,184 

                 

    Aggregate
    Market Value

                  

    Aggregate
    Market Value

     
          

                 $14,648,874              $20,378,654 
       

    Mr. Shebik

     Feb. 06, 2004 20,265   $45.96 Feb. 06, 2014          Feb. 22, 2005 20,836   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015         

     Feb. 22, 2005 20,836   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015          Feb. 21, 2006 15,464   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016         

     Feb. 21, 2006 15,464   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016          Feb. 21, 2006 9,000   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016         

     Feb. 21, 2006 9,000   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016          Feb. 20, 2007 15,571   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017         

     Feb. 20, 2007 15,571   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017          Feb. 26, 2008 25,763   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018         

     Feb. 26, 2008 25,763   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018          Feb. 27, 2009 38,715   $16.83 Feb. 27, 2019         

     Feb. 27, 2009 44,036 14,679 $16.83 Feb. 27, 2019 Feb. 27, 2009 10,332 $415,037      Feb. 22, 2010 25,212 8,404 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 883 $48,159     

     Feb. 22, 2010 16,808 16,808 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 1,766 $70,940      Feb. 22, 2011 17,598 17,599 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 1,771 $96,590     

     Feb. 22, 2011 0 35,197 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 3,541 $142,242      Feb. 21, 2012 0 26,446 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Feb. 21, 2012 7,265 $396,233     

     Feb. 21, 2012 0 26,446 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Feb. 21, 2012 7,265 $291,835      Mar. 06, 2012 0 35,014 $31.00 Mar. 06, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012 12,980 $707,929 3,246 $177,037 

     Mar. 06, 2012 0 35,014 $31.00 Mar. 06, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012     9,736 $391,095  Feb. 12, 2013 0 75,188 $45.61 Feb. 12, 2023 Feb. 12, 2013 13,154 $717,419 13,156 $717,528 

                 

    Aggregate
    Market Value

                  

    Aggregate
    Market Value

     
          

                 $1,311,149              $2,860,895 
       

    Mr. Civgin

     Sep. 08, 2008 65,000   $46.48 Sep. 08, 2018          Sept. 8, 2008 65,000   $46.48 Sept. 8, 2018         

     Feb. 27, 2009 151,125 50,375 $16.83 Feb. 27, 2019 Feb. 27, 2009 35,458 $1,424,348      Feb. 22, 2010 83,958 27,986 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 4,751 $259,120     

     Feb. 22, 2010 55,972 55,972 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 9,500 $381,615      Feb. 22, 2011 57,672 57,672 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 9,373 $511,203     

     Feb. 22, 2011 0 115,344 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 18,746 $753,027      Feb. 21, 2012 0 109,573 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012 40,860 $2,228,504 10,215 $557,126 

     Feb. 21, 2012 0 109,573 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012     30,645 $1,231,009  Feb. 12, 2013 0 87,719 $45.61 Feb. 12, 2023 Feb. 12, 2013 15,346 $836,971 15,348 $837,080 

                 

    Aggregate
    Market Value

                  

    Aggregate
    Market Value

     
          

                 $3,789,999              $5,230,004 
       

    Ms. Greffin

     Feb. 06, 2004 4,588   $45.96 Feb. 06, 2014          Mar. 09, 2004 20,714   $45.29 Mar. 09, 2014         

     Mar. 09, 2004 20,714   $45.29 Mar. 09, 2014          Feb. 22, 2005 15,314   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015         

     Mar. 09, 2004 2,000   $45.29 Mar. 09, 2014          Feb. 22, 2005 4,720   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015         

     Feb. 22, 2005 15,314   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015          Feb. 21, 2006 19,919   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016         

     Feb. 22, 2005 4,720   $52.57 Feb. 22, 2015          Feb. 21, 2006 4,723   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016         

     Feb. 21, 2006 19,919   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016          Feb. 20, 2007 21,291   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017         

     Feb. 21, 2006 4,723   $53.84 Feb. 21, 2016          Feb. 20, 2007 4,854   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017         

     Feb. 20, 2007 21,291   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017          Jul. 17, 2007 3,660   $60.42 Jul. 17, 2017         

     Feb. 20, 2007 4,854   $62.24 Feb. 20, 2017          Feb. 26, 2008 68,365   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018         

     Jul. 17, 2007 3,660   $60.42 Jul. 17, 2017          Feb. 26, 2008 28,298   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018         

     Feb. 26, 2008 68,365   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018          Aug. 11, 2008 14,250   $46.56 Aug. 11, 2018         

     Feb. 26, 2008 28,298   $48.82 Feb. 26, 2018          Feb. 27, 2009 96,911   $16.83 Feb. 27, 2019         

     Aug. 11, 2008 14,250   $46.56 Aug. 11, 2018          Feb. 22, 2010 68,316 22,772 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 3,866 $210,852     

     Feb. 27, 2009 105,242 35,081 $16.83 Feb. 27, 2019 Feb. 27, 2009 24,692 $991,878      Feb. 22, 2011 51,905 51,905 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 8,436 $460,099     

     Feb. 22, 2010 45,544 45,544 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 7,730 $310,514      Feb. 21, 2012 0 103,806 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012 38,708 $2,111,134 9,678 $527,838 

     Feb. 22, 2011 0 103,810 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 16,871 $677,708      Feb. 12, 2013 0 76,441 $45.61 Feb. 12, 2023 Feb. 12, 2013 13,374 $729,418 13,374 $729,418 

     Feb. 21, 2012 0 103,806 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012     29,032 $1,166,215              

    Aggregate
    Market Value

     

                 

    Aggregate
    Market Value

        
                    $4,768,759 

                 $3,146,315   
     

    45  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  44


    Table of Contents


     Option Awards(1)
      
      
     Stock Awards
      Option Awards(1)
      
      
     Stock Awards(2)
     
       
    Name
     Option Grant
    Date

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Exercisable(2)

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Unexercisable(3)

     Option
    Exercise
    Price

     Option
    Expiration
    Date

     Stock Award
    Grant Date

     Number of
    Shares or
    Units of
    Stock That
    Have Not
    Vested (#)(4)

     Market Value
    of Shares or
    Units of Stock
    That Have
    Not
    Vested ($)(5)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Number of
    Unearned
    Shares,
    Units, or
    Other
    Rights
    that Have
    Not
    Vested (#)(6)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Market or
    Payout Value
    of Unearned
    Shares, Units,
    or Other
    Rights that
    Have Not
    Vested ($)(5)

      Option Grant
    Date

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Exercisable(3)

     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options (#)
    Unexercisable(4)

     Option
    Exercise
    Price

     Option
    Expiration
    Date

     Stock Award
    Grant Date

     Number of
    Shares or
    Units of
    Stock That
    Have Not
    Vested (#)(5)

     Market Value
    of Shares or
    Units of Stock
    That Have
    Not
    Vested ($)(6)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Number of
    Unearned
    Shares,
    Units, or
    Other
    Rights
    that Have
    Not
    Vested (#)(7)

     Equity
    Incentive
    Plan
    Awards:
    Market or
    Payout Value
    of Unearned
    Shares, Units,
    or Other
    Rights that
    Have Not
    Vested ($)(6)

     
     

    Mr. Gupta

     May 02, 2011 0 92,593 $33.88 May 02, 2021 May 2, 2011 19,923 $800,307     

     Feb. 21, 2012 0 75,692 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012     21,169 $850,359 

                 

    Aggregate
    Market Value

     
       

                 $1,650,666 
       

    Mr. Winter

     Nov. 02, 2009 25,155 8,385 $29.64 Nov. 02, 2019 Nov. 02, 2009 5,904 $237,164      Nov. 02, 2009 8,385   $29.64 Nov. 02, 2019         

     Feb. 22, 2010 68,939 68,940 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 11,700 $469,989      Feb. 22, 2010 24,620 34,471 $31.41 Feb. 22, 2020 Feb. 22, 2010 5,850 $319,059     

     Feb. 22, 2011 0 149,269 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 24,260 $974,524      Feb. 22, 2011 74,634 74,635 $31.74 Feb. 22, 2021 Feb. 22, 2011 12,130 $661,570     

     Feb. 21, 2012 0 144,175 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012     40,323 $1,619,775  Feb. 21, 2012 0 144,175 $31.56 Feb. 21, 2022 Mar. 06, 2012 53,764 $2,932,289 13,441 $733,072 

                 

    Aggregate
    Market Value

      Feb. 12, 2013 0 105,994 $45.61 Feb. 12, 2023 Feb. 12, 2013 18,544 $1,011,390 18,545 $1,011,444 
                    

    Aggregate
    Market Value

     

                 $3,301,452    
                  $6,668,824 
     
    (1)
    The options granted in 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010 vest over four years: 50% on the second anniversary date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates. The other options vest in four installments of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The exercise price of each option is equal to the fair market value of Allstate's common stock on the grant date. For options granted prior to 2007, fair market value is equal to the average of high and low sale prices on the grant date. For options granted in 2007 and thereafter, fair market value is equal to the closing sale price on the grant date. In each case, if there was no sale on the grant date, fair market value is calculated as of the last previous day on which there was a sale.

    (2)
    The awards granted prior to 2012 are restricted stock units. The awards granted in 2012 and 2013 are PSAs, except for Mr. Shebik's February 21, 2012, restricted stock unit award.

    (3)
    The aggregate value and aggregate number of exercisable in-the-money options as of December 31, 2012,2013, for each of the named executives is as follows: Mr. Wilson $14,986,371 (772,515$42,956,255 (1,916,014 aggregate number exercisable), Mr. Shebik $1,175,038 (60,844$2,649,867 (152,588 aggregate number exercisable), Mr. Civgin $4,017,572 (207,097$3,780,770 (206,630 aggregate number exercisable), Ms. Greffin $2,855,314 (150,786$7,333,045 (393,435 aggregate number exercisable), Mr. Gupta $0 (0 exercisable), and Mr. Winter $868,788 (94,094$2,479,902 (107,639 aggregate number exercisable).

    (3)(4)
    The aggregate value and aggregate number of unexercisable in-the-money options as of December 31, 2012,2013, for each of the named executives is as follows: Mr. Wilson $13,813,157 (1,288,565$20,969,386 (1,135,767 aggregate number unexercisable), Mr. Shebik $1,335,335 (128,144$2,699,029 (162,651 aggregate number unexercisable), Mr. Civgin $3,581,841 (331,264$5,263,556 (282,950 aggregate number unexercisable), Ms. Greffin $2,986,644 (288,241 aggregate number unexercisable), Mr. Gupta $1,234,118 (168,285$4,778,230 (254,924 aggregate number unexercisable), and Mr. Winter $3,191,893 (370,769$6,758,660 (359,275 aggregate number unexercisable).

    (4)(5)
    The restricted stock unit awards granted in 2012, 2011, and 2010 vest over four years: 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates. The other restricted stock unit awards vest in one installment on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, unless otherwise noted.date. The PSAs granted in 2013 and 2012 vest in one installment on the third anniversary of the grant date.

    (5)(6)
    Amount is based on the closing price of our common stock of $40.17$54.54 on December 31, 2012.2013.

    (6)(7)
    The performance stock awardsPSAs granted in 2013 and 2012 vest in one installment on the third anniversary of the grant date.

    45  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  46


    Table of Contents


    Option Exercises and Stock Vested at Fiscal Year-End 20122013

    The following table summarizes the options exercised by the named executives during 20122013 and the restricted stock unit awards that vested during 2012.2013.

    OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED AT FISCAL YEAR-END 20122013


     Option Awards(1)
     Stock Awards
      Option Awards(1)
     Stock Awards
     

          
    Name
     Number of
    Shares
    Acquired on
    Exercise (#)

     Value
    Realized
    on Exercise
    ($)

     Number of
    Shares
    Acquired on
    Vesting (#)

     Value
    Realized
    on Vesting
    ($)

      Number of
    Shares
    Acquired on
    Exercise
    (#)

     Value
    Realized
    on Exercise
    ($)

     Number of
    Shares
    Acquired on
    Vesting
    (#)

     Value
    Realized
    on Vesting
    ($)

     
       

    Mr. Wilson

     101,000 950,410 72,139 2,269,366  97,100 738,931 186,370 8,540,254 
       

    Mr. Shebik

     17,000 162,266 4,561 143,386  40,265 832,239 12,985 594,011 
       

    Mr. Civgin

     0 0 13,799 465,252  201,500 6,541,476 49,580 2,271,716 
       

    Ms. Greffin

     4,960 50,046 19,716 629,770  50,000 1,431,154 36,991 1,696,502 
       

    Mr. Gupta

     0 0 0 0 
     

    Mr. Winter

     0 0 11,700 369,252  103,943 2,090,019 23,884 1,150,096 
       
    (1)
    OptionsFor Mr. Wilson, all options exercised in 20122013 were due to expire in the first quarter of 2013.2014. Of the options exercised in 2013 by Ms. Greffin and Mr. Shebik, 6,588 and 20,265 options, respectively, were due to expire in the first quarter of 2014.


    Retirement Benefits

    The following table provides information about the pension plans in which the named executives participate. Each of the named executive participates in two different defined benefit pension plans. The following table summarizes the named executives' pension benefits, which are calculated inAllstate Retirement Plan (ARP) and the same manner as the change in pension value reflected in theSummary Compensation TableSupplemental Retirement Income Plan (SRIP).

    PENSION BENEFITS

    Name
     Plan Name
     Number of
    Years
    Credited
    Service
    (#)

     Present
    Value of
    Accumulated
    Benefit(1)(2)
    ($)

     Payments
    During Last
    Fiscal Year
    ($)

      Plan Name
     Number of
    Years
    Credited
    Service
    (#)

     Present
    Value of
    Accumulated
    Benefit(1)(2)
    ($)

     Payments
    During Last
    Fiscal Year
    ($)

     
       
    Mr. Wilson(3) Allstate Retirement Plan 19.8 714,755 0  ARP 20.8 733,308 0 
     Supplemental Retirement Income Plan 19.8 7,321,764 0  SRIP 20.8 10,023,371 0 
       
    Mr. Shebik Allstate Retirement Plan 24.2 883,828 0  ARP 25.2 912,535 0 
     Supplemental Retirement Income Plan 24.2 1,495,579 0  SRIP 25.2 2,537,454 0 
       
    Mr. Civgin Allstate Retirement Plan 4.3 21,750 0  ARP 5.3 27,194 0 
     Supplemental Retirement Income Plan 4.3 83,378 0  SRIP 5.3 147,356 0 
       
    Ms. Greffin Allstate Retirement Plan 22.3 749,619 0  ARP 23.3 741,007 0 
     Supplemental Retirement Income Plan 22.3 3,254,696 0  SRIP 23.3 3,535,123 0 
       
    Mr. Gupta(4) Allstate Retirement Plan 1.8 0 0 
     Supplemental Retirement Income Plan 1.8 11,519 0 
     
    Mr. Winter Allstate Retirement Plan 3.2 13,822 0  ARP 4.2 20,410 0 
     Supplemental Retirement Income Plan 3.2 90,536 0  SRIP 4.2 186,122 0 
       
    (1)
    These amounts are estimates and do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that will be paid to the named executives, which will be known only at the time they become eligible for payment. Accrued benefits were calculated as of December 31, 2012, and used to calculate theThe present value of the accumulated benefits at December 31, 2012. December 31 is our pension planbenefit was determined using the same measurement date used(December 31, 2013) and material assumptions that we use for year-end financial statement reporting purposes.purposes, except that we made no assumptions for early termination, disability, or pre-retirement mortality. Other assumptions include the following:

    Retirement at the normal retirement age as defined in the plans (age 65).

    47  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  46


    Table of Contents


    The amounts listed in this column are based on the following assumptions:

      Discount rate of 4.00%, payment form assuming5.00%.

      For final average pay formula, 80% paid as a lump sum and 20% paid as an annuity, lump-sum/annuity; for cash balance formula, 100% paid as a lump sum.

      Lump-sum/annuity conversion segmented interest rates of 4.25%4.00% for the first five years, 6.0%5.75% for the next 15 years, and 6.75%6.50% for all years after 20 and the 201320.

      2014 combined static Pension Protection Act funding mortality table with a blend of 50% males and 50% females (as required under the Internal Revenue Code), and post-retirementfemales.

      Post-retirement mortality for annuitants using the 20132014 Internal Revenue Service mandated annuitant table; these are the same as those used for financial reporting year-end disclosure as described in the notes to Allstate's consolidated financial statements. (Seetable.


    See note 1718 to our audited financial statements for 2012.)2013 for additional information.

    Based on guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have assumed a normal retirement age of 65 under both the ARP and SRIP.

    No assumption for early termination, disability, or pre-retirement mortality.

    (2)
    The figures reflect the present value of the current accrued pension benefits calculated using the assumptions described in the preceding footnote. If the named executives' employment terminated on December 31, 2012,following table shows the lump sum present value of the non-qualified pension benefits for each named executive earned through December 31, 2012, is shown in2013, if the following table:named executives' employment terminated on that date.

     Name
      
     Plan Name
      
     Lump Sum Amount
    ($)

     
       
     

    Mr. Wilson

       Supplemental Retirement Income PlanSRIP    8,362,75311,395,205 
       
     

    Mr. Shebik

       Supplemental Retirement Income PlanSRIP    1,774,2452,936,166 
       
     

    Mr. Civgin

       Supplemental Retirement Income PlanSRIP    75,735151,770 
       
     

    Ms. Greffin

       Supplemental Retirement Income PlanSRIP    4,103,726

    Mr. Gupta

    Supplemental Retirement Income Plan10,4794,094,327 
       
     

    Mr. Winter

       Supplemental Retirement Income PlanSRIP    84,829189,733 
       

    The amount shown is based on the lump sum methodology (i.e., interest rate and mortality table) used by the Allstate pension plans in 2013, as required under the Pension Protection Act.2014. Specifically, the interest rate for 20132014 is based on 100% of the average corporate bond segmented yield curve from August of the prior year. TheAs required under the Internal Revenue Code, the mortality table used for 20132014 is the 20132014 combined static Pension Protection Act funding mortality table with a blend of 50% males and 50% females, as required under the Internal Revenue Code.

    (3)
    Mr. Wilson's prior employment with another former Sears, Roebuck and Co. subsidiary is counted in determining his 26.5 years of vesting service under the Allstate Retirement Plan, but is not included in the calculation of credited service used for benefit determination purposes.

    (4)
    Mr. Gupta is not currently vested in the Allstate Retirement Plan or the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan.females.

    47  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  48


    Table of Contents

    The benefits and value of benefits shown in the
    Pension Benefits table are based on the following material factors:

    TheContributions to the ARP hasare made entirely by Allstate and are paid into a trust fund from which benefits are paid. Before January 1, 2014, ARP participants earned benefits under one of two different types of benefit formulas (final average pay andor cash balance) which apply to participants based on their date of hire or their choice at the individual choices they made before atime Allstate introduced the cash balance plan was introducedformula. In order to better align our pension benefits with market practices, provide future pension benefits more equitably to Allstate employees, and reduce costs, final average pay benefits were frozen as of December 31, 2013. Beginning on January 1, 2003. Of the named executives, Messrs. Civgin, Gupta, and Winter are2014, all eligible toparticipants earn benefits under a new cash balance benefits. formula only.

    Final Average Pay Formula

    Benefits under the final average pay formula arewere earned and are stated in the form of a straight life annuity payable at the normal retirement age of 65. Participants who earn final average pay benefits may do so under one or more benefit formulas based on when they became ARP members and their years of service.

    Ms. Greffin and Messrs. Shebik and Wilson have earned ARP benefits under the post-1988 final average pay formula that isbenefits equal to the sum of thea Base Benefit and thean Additional Benefit. The Base Benefit defined as follows:

    Base Benefit=equals 1.55% of the participant's average annual compensation, multiplied by credited service after 1988 (limited to 28 years of credited service)

    through 2013. The Additional Benefit=Benefit equals 0.65% of the amount if any, of the participant's average annual compensation that exceeds the participant's covered compensation, (themultiplied by credited service after 1988 through 2013. Covered compensation is the average of the maximum annual salary taxable for Social Security over the 35-year period ending the year the participant would reach Social Security retirement age) multipliedage. Messrs. Shebik and Wilson are eligible for a reduced early retirement benefit which would reduce their Base Benefit by credited service after 1988 (limited4.8% for each year of early payment before age 65 and their Additional Benefit by 8% for each year of early payment from age 62 to 28 yearsage 65 and 4% for each year of credited service)

    For participants eligibleearly payment from age 55 to earn cash balanceage 62, prorated on a monthly basis based on age at the date payments begin.

    Cash Balance Formula

    Messrs. Civgin and Winter earned benefits pay credits are added tounder the cash balance accountformula. Under this formula, participants receive pay credits while employed at Allstate, based on a quarterly basis aspercentage of eligible annual compensation and years of service, plus interest credits. Pay credits are allocated to a percenthypothetical account in an amount equal to 0% to 7% of eligible annual compensation, anddepending on years of vesting service. Interest credits are allocated to the hypothetical account based on the participant'sinterest crediting rate in effect for that plan year as published by the Internal Revenue Service. The interest crediting rate is set annually and is currently based on the average yield for 30-year U.S. Treasury securities for August of the prior year. Under the new cash balance formula effective January 1, 2014, all participants receive pay credits in an amount equal to 3% to 5% of eligible annual compensation, depending on years of vesting service as follows:service. No change was made to the method of allocating interest credits.

    Cash Balance Plan Pay Credits

    Vesting
    Service

    Pay Credit %

    Less than 1 year

    0%

    1 year, but less than 5 years

    2.5%

    5 years, but less than 10 years

    3%

    10 years, but less than 15 years

    4%

    15 years, but less than 20 years

    5%

    20 years, but less than 25 years

    6%

    25 years or more

    7%

    SRIP benefits are generally determined using a two-step process: (1) determine the amount that would be payable under the ARP formulaformula(s) specified above if Internal Revenue Code limits did not apply, then (2) reduce the amount described in (1) by the amount actually payable under the applicable ARP formula.formula(s). The normal retirement date under the SRIP is age 65. If eligible for early retirement under the ARP, the employee also is eligible for early retirement under the SRIP. SRIP benefits are not funded and are paid out of Allstate's general assets.

    As has generally been Allstate's practice, noNo additional service credit beyond service with Allstate or its predecessors is granted under the ARP or the SRIP.SRIP to any of the named executives. Messrs. Shebik and Wilson have combined service with Allstate and its former parent company, Sears, Roebuck and Co., of 24.225.2 and 19.820.8 years, respectively. As a result, of this prior Sears service, a portion of their retirement benefits will be paid from the Sears pension plan. Consistent with the pension benefits of other employees with prior Sears service who moved to Allstate during the spin-off from Sears in 1995, Messrs. Shebik's and Wilson's final average pay pension benefits under the ARP and the SRIP are calculated as if each had worked his combined Sears-Allstate career with Allstate through December 31, 2013, and then are reduced by amounts earned under the Sears pension plan.

    For
    Eligible Compensation

    Under both the ARP and SRIP, eligible compensation consists of salary, annual cash incentive awards, pre-tax employee deposits made to our 401(k) plan and our cafeteria plan, holiday pay, and vacation pay. Eligiblecertain other forms of compensation, also includes overtime pay, payment for temporary military

    The Allstate Corporation  --  48


    Table of Contents

    service, and payments for short term disability, but does not include long-term cash incentive awards or income related to equity awards. Compensation used to determine benefits under the ARP is limited in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. For final average pay benefits, average annual compensation is the average compensation of the five highest consecutive calendar years within the last ten consecutive calendar years preceding the actual retirement or termination date.through 2013.

    49  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


    Payment Options

    Payment options under the ARP include a lump sum, straight life annuity, and various survivor annuity options. The lump sum under the final average pay benefit is calculated in accordance with the applicable interest rate and mortality as required under the Internal Revenue Code. The lump sum payment under the cash balance benefit is generally equal to a participant's cash balance account balance. Payments from the SRIP are paid in the form of a lump sum using the same interest rate and mortality assumptions used under the ARP.

    Age 65 isEligible employees are vested in the earliest retirement age that a named executive may retire with fullnormal ARP and SRIP retirement benefits on the earlier of the completion of five years of service or upon reaching age 65 (for participants whose benefits are calculated under the ARP and SRIP. However, afinal average pay formula) or the completion of three years of service or upon reaching age 65 (for participants whose benefits are calculated under the cash balance formula).

    Final average pay benefits are payable at age 65. A participant earningwith final average pay benefits ismay be entitled to ana reduced early retirement benefit on or after age 55 if he or she terminates employment after completing 20 or more years of vesting service. A participant earning cash balance benefits who terminates employment with at least three years of vesting service is entitled to a lump sum benefit equal to his or her cash balance account balance. Currently, Messrs. Shebik and Wilson are the only named executives eligible for an early retirement benefit.

    As defined in the SRIP, SRIP benefits earned through December 31, 2004 (Pre 409A SRIP Benefits) are generally payable at the normal retirement age of 65. Pre 409A SRIP Benefits may be payable at age 50 or later if disabled, following early retirement at age 55 or older with 20 years of vesting service, or following death, in accordance with the terms of the SRIP. SRIP benefits earned after December 31, 2004 (Post 409A SRIP Benefits) are paid on the January 1 following termination of employment after reaching age 55 (a minimum six month deferral period applies), or following death, in accordance with the terms of the SRIP.

    Eligible employees are vested in the normal ARP and SRIP retirement benefit on the earlier of the completion of five years of service or upon reaching age 65 (for participants with final average pay benefits) or the completion of three years of service or upon reaching age 65 (for participants whose benefits are calculated under the cash balance formula). The following SRIP payment dates assume a retirement or termination date of December 31, 2012:2013:

    Mr.Messrs. Shebik's and Wilson's Pre 409A SRIP Benefitbenefits earned prior to 2005 would become payable as early as January 1, 2013,2014, or following death or disability. Mr. Wilson's Post 409A SRIP BenefitBenefits earned after 2004 would be paid on July 1, 2013, or following death. Mr. Wilson will turn 65 on October 15, 2022.

    Mr. Shebik's Pre 409A SRIP Benefit would be payable as early as January 1, 2013,2014, or following death or disability. Mr. Shebik's Post 409A SRIP Benefit would be paid on July 1, 2013, or following death. Mr. Shebik will turn 65 on June 19, 2021.

    Mr. Civgin's Post 409A SRIP Benefitbenefit would be paid on January 1, 2017, or following death. Mr. Civgin will turn 65 on May 17, 2026.

    Ms. Greffin's Pre 409A SRIP Benefitbenefits would be payable as early as January 1, 2016, or following death or disability.death. A portion of Ms. Greffin's Post 409A SRIP Benefitbenefits would be paid onpayable as early as January 1, 2016, or2014, following death. Ms. Greffin will turn 65 on August 16, 2025.

    Mr. Gupta's Post 409A SRIP Benefit is not currently vested, but would become payable following death. Mr. Gupta will turn 65 on March 4, 2026.disability.

    Mr. Winter's Post 409A SRIP Benefitbenefit would be paid on July 1, 2013,2014, or following death. Mr. Winter will turn 65 on January 22, 2022.

    49  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  50


    Table of Contents


    Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

    The following table summarizes the non-qualified deferred compensation contributions, earnings, and account balances of our named executives in 2012.2013. All amounts relate to The Allstate Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan.

    NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION AT FISCAL YEAR-END 20122013

    Name
     Executive
    Contributions
    in Last FY
    ($)

     Registrant
    Contributions
    in Last FY
    ($)

     Aggregate
    Earnings
    in Last FY
    ($)(1)

     Aggregate
    Withdrawals/
    Distributions
    ($)

     Aggregate
    Balance
    at Last FYE
    ($)(2)

      Executive
    Contributions
    in Last FY
    ($)

     Registrant
    Contributions
    in Last FY
    ($)

     Aggregate
    Earnings
    in Last FY
    ($)(1)

     Aggregate
    Withdrawals/
    Distributions
    ($)

     Aggregate
    Balance
    at Last FYE
    ($)(2)

     
       

    Mr. Wilson

     0 0 73,024 0 526,887  0 0 190,397 0 717,283 
       

    Mr. Shebik

     0 0 14,265 0 100,913  0 0 33,359 0 134,271 
       

    Mr. Civgin

     0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 
       

    Ms. Greffin

     0 0 205,294 0 1,657,102  0 0 376,925 0 2,034,027 
       

    Mr. Gupta

     0 0 0 0 0 
     

    Mr. Winter

     0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 
       
    (1)
    Aggregate earnings were not included in the named executive's compensation in the last completed fiscal year in theSummary Compensation Table.

    (2)
    There are no amounts reported in theAggregate Balance at Last FYE column that previously were reported as compensation in theSummary Compensation Table.

    In order to remain competitive with other employers, we allow the named executives and other employees whose annual compensation exceeds the amount specified in the Internal Revenue Code ($250,000255,000 in 2012)2013), to defer up to 80% of their salary and/or up to 100% of their annual cash incentive award that exceeds that amount under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Allstate does not match participant deferrals and does not guarantee a stated rate of return.

    Deferrals under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with earnings or debited for losses based on the results of the investment option or options selected by the participants. The investment options available in 20122013 under the Deferred Compensation Plan are: Stable Value, S&P 500, International Equity, Russell 2000, Mid-Cap, and Bond Funds. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, deferrals are not actually invested in these funds, but instead are credited with earnings or debited for losses based on the funds' investment returns net of administration and investment expenses.returns. Because the rate of return is based on actual investment measures in our 401(k) plan, no above marketabove-market earnings are paid. Our Deferred Compensation Plan and 401(k) plan allow participants to change their investment elections daily. Investment changes are effective the next business day. The Deferred Compensation Plan is unfunded; participantsunfunded. This means that Allstate does not set aside funds for the plan in a trust or otherwise. Participants have only the rights of general unsecured creditors.creditors and may lose their balances in the event of the company's bankruptcy. Account balances are 100% vested at all times.

    Deferrals underAn irrevocable distribution election is required before making any deferrals into the Deferred Compensation Plan are segregated into Pre 409A balances and Post 409A balances. Aplan. Generally, a named executive may elect to begin receiving a distribution of a Pre 409Ahis or her account balance immediately upon separation from service or in one of the first through fifth years after separation from service. The earliest distribution date for Post 409A balances is six months following separation from service. The named executive may elect to receive payment of a Pre 409A balance in a lump sum or in annual cash installment payments over a period of two to ten years. In addition, a named executive may elect an in-service withdrawal of his or her entire Pre 409A balance, subject to forfeiture of 10% of such balance. An irrevocable distribution election is required before making any Post 409A deferrals into the plan. The distribution options available to the Post 409A balances are similar to those available to the Pre 409A balances, except the earliest distribution date is six months following separation from service. Upon proof of an unforeseen emergency, a plan participant may be allowed to access certain funds in a deferred compensation account earlier than the dates specified above.

    51  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  50


    Table of Contents


    Potential Payments as a Result of Termination or Change-in-Control (CIC)

    The following table lists the compensation and benefits that Allstate would provide to the named executives in various scenarios involving a termination of employment, other than compensation and benefits generally available to all salaried employees. The table describes equity granting practices for the 20122013 equity incentive awards. To the extentRelevant prior practices are relevant they are described in the footnotes.

     
     Compensation Elements
     
      
    Termination
    Scenarios

     Base Salary
     Severance
    Pay

     Annual
    Incentive(1)

     Stock
    Options(1)(2)

     Restricted
    Stock Units(1)(2)

     Performance
    Stock
    Awards(1)(2)

     Non-Qualified
    Pension
    Benefits(3)

     Deferred
    Compensation(4)

     Health,
    Welfare and
    Other Benefits

     
    Termination(5) Ceases immediately None Forfeited unless terminated on last day of fiscal year Unvested are forfeited, vested expire at the earlier of three months or normal expiration Forfeited Forfeited Distributions commence per plan Distributions commence per participant election None
     
    Retirement Ceases Immediatelyimmediately None Pro ratedProrated for the year based on actual performance for the year with anyand subject to discretionary adjustments(6) Awards granted more than 12 months before, and pro rata portion of award granted within 12 months of, retirement continue to vest. All expire at earlier of five years or normal expiration.(7) Awards granted more than 12 months before, and pro rata portion of award granted within 12 months of retirement continue to vest.vest(7) Awards granted more than 12 months before, and pro rata portion of awards granted within 12 months of retirement continue to vest and are paid out based on actual performance.performance(7) Distributions commence per plan Distributions commence per participant election None
     
    Termination due to Change- in-ControlChange-in-Control(8) Ceases Immediatelyimmediately Lump sum equal to two times salary and annual incentive at target, except for CEO who receives three times salary, and annual incentive at target(9) Pro rated at target (reduced by any actually paid) Awards vest upon qualifying termination after a CIC.CIC(10) Awards vest upon qualifying termination after a CIC.CIC(10) Awards vest based on performance upon a qualifying termination after CIC.a CIC(10)(11) Immediately payable upon a CIC Immediately payable upon a CIC Outplacement services provided; lump sum payment equal to additional cost of welfare benefits continuation coverage for 18 months(11)(12)
     
    Death One month salary paid upon deathCeases immediately None Pro rated for year based on actual performance for the year with anyand subject to discretionary adjustments VestAwards vest immediately and expire at earlier of two years or normal expiration VestAwards vest immediately VestsAwards vest and isare payable immediately.immediately(12)(13) Distributions commence per plan Payable within 90 days None
     
    Disability Ceases Immediatelyimmediately None Pro rated for year based on actual performance for the year with anyand subject to discretionary adjustments VestAwards vest immediately and expire at earlier of two years or normal expiration VestAwards vest immediately(13)(14) VestsAwards vest and isare payable immediately.immediately(12)(13) Participant may request payment if age 50 or older Distributions commence per participant election Supplemental Long Term Disability benefits if enrolled in basic long term disability plan
     
    (1)
    Named executives who receive an equity award under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan or an annual cash incentive award under the Annual Executive Incentive Plan after May 19, 2009, are subject to a non-solicitation covenant while they are employed and for the one-year period following termination of employment. If a named executive violates the non-solicitation covenant, the Board or a committee of the Board, to the extent permitted by applicable law, may recover compensation provided to the named executive, including cancellation of outstanding awards or recovery of all or a portion of any gain realized upon vesting, settlement, or exercise of an award or recovery of all or a portion of any proceeds resulting from any disposition of shares received pursuant to an award if the vesting, settlement, or exercise of the award or the receipt of the sale proceeds occurred during the 12-month period prior to the violation.

    51  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  52


    Table of Contents

    (2)
    Named executives who receive an equity award on or after FebruaryMay 21, 2012,2013, that remains subject to a period of restriction or other performance or vesting condition, are subject to a non-compete provision while they are employed and for the two yearone-year period following termination of employment. Named executives who received equity awards granted between February 21, 2012, and May 20, 2013, are subject to a non-compete provision while they are employed and for the two-year period following termination of employment. If a named executive violates the non-competition covenant, the Board or a committee of the Board may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, cancel any or all of the named executive's outstanding awards granted on or after February 21, 2012, that remain subject to a period of restriction or other performance or vesting condition as of the date on which the named executive first violated the non-competition provision.

    (3)
    See theRetirement Benefits section for further detail on non-qualified pension benefits and timing of payments.

    (4)
    See theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation section for additional information on the Deferred Compensation Plan and distribution options available.

    (5)
    Includes both voluntary and involuntary termination. Examples of involuntary termination independent of a change-in-control include performance-related terminations; terminations for employee dishonesty and violation of Allstate rules, regulations, or policies; and terminations resulting from lack of work, rearrangement of work, or reduction in force.

    (6)
    Retirement for purposes of the Annual Executive Incentive Plan is defined as voluntary termination on or after the date the named executive attains age 55 with at least 20 years of service.

    (7)
    This description is the treatment of equity awards granted after February 20, 2012. Retirement for purposes of all equity awards granted after February 20, 2012, is age 60 with five years of service or age 55 with 10 years of service. Historical retirement definitions and treatment for purposes of stock options and restricted stock units are as follows:

      
      
     Date of award prior to
    February 22, 2011

     Date of award
    on or after February 22, 2011
    and before February 21, 2012

      
       Definition Age 55 with 20 years of service Age 55 with 10 years of service
       
     
     Early
    Retirement

     Treatment Unvested awards are forfeited. Stock options expire at the earlier of five years from the date of retirement or the expiration date of the option. Prorated portion of unvested awards continue to vest. Stock options expire at the earlier of five years from the date of retirement or the expiration date of the option.
        
       Definition Age 60 with at least one year of service Age 60 with at least one year of service
       
     
     Normal
    Retirement
     Treatment Unvested awards continue to vest and stock options expire at the earlier of five years from the date of retirement or the expiration date of the option. 

    Unvested awards not granted within 12 months of retirement continue to vest.

    Prorated portion of unvested awards granted within 12 months of the retirement date continue to vest.

    Stock options expire at the earlier of five years from the date of retirement or the expiration date of the option.

      

    53  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  52


    Table of Contents

    (8)
    In general, a change-in-control is one or more of the following events: (1) any person acquires 30% or more of the combined voting power of Allstate common stock within a 12-month period; (2) any person acquires more than 50% of the combined voting power of Allstate common stock; (3) certain changes are made to the composition of the Board; or (4) the consummation of a merger, reorganization, or similar transaction. These triggers were selected because any of these could cause a substantial change in management in a widely held company the size of Allstate. Effective upon a change-in-control, the named executives become subject to covenants prohibiting solicitation of employees, customers, and suppliers at any time until one year after termination of employment. If a named executive incurs legal fees or other expenses in an effort to enforce the change-in-control plan, Allstate will reimburse the named executive for these expenses unless it is established by a court that the named executive had no reasonable basis for the claim or acted in bad faith.

    (9)
    Under the change-in-control plan, severance benefits would be payable if a named executive's employment is terminated either by Allstate without cause or by the executive for good reason as defined in the plan during the two years following the change-in-control. Cause means the named executive has been convicted of a felony or other crime involving fraud or dishonesty, has willfully or intentionally breached the restrictive covenants in the change-in-control plan, has habitually neglected his or her duties, or has engaged in willful or reckless material misconduct in the performance of his or her duties. Good reason includes a material diminution in a named executive's base compensation, authority, duties, or responsibilities, or a material change in the geographic location where the named executive performs services.

    (10)
    This description is the treatment of equity awards granted on or after December 30, 2011. Awards granted prior to December 30, 2011, vest on the date of a change-in-control.

    (11)
    For completed measurement periods with results certified by the Committee, the earned amount continues to vest. For open cycles, the Committee will determine the number of performance stock awardsPSAs that continue to vest based on actual performance up to the change-in-control.

    (11)(12)
    If a named executive's employment is terminated by reason ofdue to death during the two years after the date of a change-in-control, the named executive's estate or beneficiary will be entitled to survivor and other benefits, including retiree medical coverage, if eligible, that are not less favorable than the most favorable benefits available to the estates or surviving families of peer executives of Allstate. In the event of termination by reason ofdue to disability, Allstate will pay disability and other benefits, including supplemental long-term disability benefits and retiree medical coverage, if eligible, that are not less favorable than the most favorable benefits available to disabled peer executives.

    (12)(13)
    For completed measurement periods with results certified by the Committee, the earned amount is paid. For open cycles, the payout is based on the target number of performance stock awards.PSAs.

    (13)(14)
    If a named executive's employment is terminated due to disability, restricted stock units granted prior to February 22, 2011, are forfeited.

    53  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  54


    Table of Contents

    ESTIMATE OF POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION(1)

    The table below describes the value of compensation and benefits payable to each named executive upon termination that would exceed the compensation or benefits generally available to all salaried employees in each termination scenario. The total column in the following table does not reflect compensation or benefits previously accrued or earned by the named executives, such as deferred compensation and non-qualified pension benefits. The payment of the 20122013 annual cash incentive award and any 20122013 salary earned but not paid in 20122013 due to Allstate's payroll cycle are not included in these tables because these are payable regardless of termination, death, or disability. Benefits and payments are calculated assuming a December 31, 2012,2013, employment termination date.

    Name
     Severance
    ($)

     Stock
    Options —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Restricted
    Stock Units —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Performance
    Stock Awards —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Welfare
    Benefits and
    Outplacement
    Services
    ($)

     Total
    ($)

      Severance
    ($)

     Stock
    Options —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Restricted
    Stock Units —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Performance
    Stock Awards —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Welfare
    Benefits and
    Outplacement
    Services
    ($)

     Total
    ($)

     
       

    Mr. Wilson

      

    Termination/Retirement(2)

     0 5,045,039 1,358,710 5,470,511 0 11,874,260  0 15,267,167 851,751 16,721,255 0 32,840,173 

    Termination due to Change-in-Control(3)

     13,200,000 13,813,157 9,660,001 6,651,831 57,836(5) 43,382,825  12,783,218(4) 20,969,386 2,951,050 17,427,603 59,850(5) 54,191,107 

    Death

     0 13,813,157 9,660,001 6,651,831 0 30,124,989  0 20,969,386 2,951,050 17,427,603 0 41,348,039 

    Disability

     0 13,813,157 2,923,532 6,651,831 15,281,378(6) 38,669,898  0 20,969,386 1,984,711 17,427,603 29,915,722(6) 70,297,422 
       

    Mr. Shebik

      

    Termination/Retirement(2)

     0 597,930 317,303 428,855 0 1,344,088  0 2,198,334 437,684 2,154,766 0 4,790,784 

    Termination due to Change-in-Control(3)

     2,340,836(4) 1,335,335 920,054 521,447 37,836(5) 5,155,508  2,200,503(4) 2,699,029 540,982 2,319,913 37,378(5) 7,797,805 

    Death

     0 1,335,335 920,054 521,447 0 2,776,836  0 2,699,029 540,982 2,319,913 0 5,559,924 

    Disability

     0 1,335,335 434,077 521,447 2,753,494(6) 5,044,353  0 2,699,029 492,823 2,319,913 5,995,735(6) 11,507,500 
       

    Mr. Civgin

      

    Termination/Retirement(2)

     0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 

    Termination due to Change-in-Control(3)

     3,150,000 3,581,841 2,558,990 1,641,346 36,899(5) 10,969,076  3,150,000 5,263,556 770,323 4,459,681 37,378(5) 13,680,938 

    Death

     0 3,581,841 2,558,990 1,641,346 0 7,782,177  0 5,263,556 770,323 4,459,681 0 10,493,560 

    Disability

     0 3,581,841 753,027 1,641,346 7,853,461(6) 13,829,675  0 5,263,556 511,203 4,459,681 13,892,063(6) 24,126,503 
       

    Ms. Greffin

      

    Termination/Retirement(2)

     0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 

    Termination due to Change-in-Control(3)

     2,562,000 2,986,644 1,980,100 1,554,941 37,836(5) 9,121,521  1,909,398(4) 4,778,230 670,951 4,097,808 35,734(5) 11,492,121 

    Death

     0 2,986,644 1,980,100 1,554,941 0 6,521,685  0 4,778,230 670,951 4,097,808 0 9,546,989 

    Disability

     0 2,986,644 677,708 1,554,941 0(6) 5,219,293  0 4,778,230 460,099 4,097,808 0(6) 9,336,137 
       

    Mr. Gupta

     

    Termination/Retirement(2)

     0 0 0 0 0 0 

    Termination due to Change-in-Control(3)

     1,740,537(4) 1,234,118 800,307 1,133,798 37,705(5) 4,946,465 

    Death

     0 1,234,118 800,307 1,133,798 0 3,168,223 

    Disability

     0 1,234,118 800,307 1,133,798 5,343,163(6) 8,511,386 
     

    Mr. Winter

      

    Termination/Retirement(2)

     0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 

    Termination due to Change-in-Control(3)

     2,838,975(4) 3,191,893 1,681,677 2,159,700 37,836(5) 9,910,081  3,750,000 6,758,660 980,629 5,688,195 39,850(5) 17,217,334 

    Death

     0 3,191,893 1,681,677 2,159,700 0 7,033,270  0 6,758,660 980,629 5,688,195 0 13,427,484 

    Disability

     0 3,191,893 974,524 2,159,700 7,043,714(6) 13,369,831  0 6,758,660 661,570 5,688,195 14,081,551(6) 27,189,976 
       
    (1)
    A "0" indicates either that there is no amount payable to the named executive, or the amount payable is the same for both the named executives and all salaried employees.

    (2)
    As of December 31, 2012,2013, Messrs. Shebik and Wilson are the only named executives eligible to retire in accordance with Allstate's policy and the terms of its equity incentive compensation and benefit plans.

    (3)
    The values in this change-in-control row represent amounts paid if both the change-in-control and qualifying termination occur on December 31, 2012. Performance stock awards2013. PSAs are paid out based on actual performance; for purposes of this table, the 2012-2014 cycle includes two years at maximum and one year at target and the 2013-2015 cycle includes one year at maximum and two years at

    The Allstate Corporation  --  54


    Table of Contents

    55  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

     Name
     Stock Options—
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Restricted stock
    units —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Total —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     
       
     

    Mr. Wilson

      9,989,800  9,660,001  19,649,801 
       
     

    Mr. Shebik

      786,557  628,219  1,414,776 
       
     

    Mr. Civgin

      2,638,417  2,558,990  5,197,407 
       
     

    Ms. Greffin

      2,092,874  1,980,100  4,072,974 
       
     

    Mr. Gupta

      582,410  800,307  1,382,717 
       
     

    Mr. Winter

      1,950,546  1,681,677  3,632,223 
       
     Name
     Stock Options —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Restricted
    Stock
    Units —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     Total —
    Unvested and
    Accelerated
    ($)

     
       
     

    Mr. Wilson

      7,519,644  2,951,050  10,470,694 
       
     

    Mr. Shebik

      595,642  144,749  740,391 
       
     

    Mr. Civgin

      1,962,238  770,323  2,732,561 
       
     

    Ms. Greffin

      1,710,150  670,951  2,381,101 
       
     

    Mr. Winter

      2,498,992  980,629  3,479,621 
       

    Beginning with awards granted in 2012, equity awards do not accelerate in the event of a change-in-control unless also accompanied by a qualifying termination of employment. A change-in-control also would accelerate the distribution of each named executive's non-qualified deferred compensation and SRIP benefits. Please see theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation at Fiscal Year End 20122013 table and footnote 2 to thePension Benefits table in theRetirement Benefits section for details regarding the applicable amounts for each named executive.

    (4)
    Under the change-in-control plan, severance benefits for Ms. Greffin and Messrs. Gupta,Wilson and Shebik and Winter were reduced by $311,463, $179,164,$778,602, $416,782, and $786,025,$319,497, respectively, to avoid the imposition of excise taxes and maximize the severance benefit available under the plan.

    (5)
    The Welfare Benefits and Outplacement Services amount includes the cost to provide certain welfare benefits to the named executive and family during the period the named executive is eligible for continuation coverage under applicable law. The amount shown reflects Allstate's costs for these benefits or programs assuming an 18-month continuation period. The value of outplacement services is $40,000 for Mr. Wilson and $20,000 for each other named executive.

    (6)
    The named executives who participate in the long-term disability plan are eligible to participate in Allstate's supplemental long-term disability plan for employees whose annual earnings exceed the level which produces the maximum monthly benefit provided by the long-term disability plan (basic plan). The benefit is equal to 60% of the named executive's qualified annual earnings divided by twelve and rounded to the nearest one hundred dollars,$100, reduced by $7,500, which is the maximum monthly benefit payment that can be received under the basic plan. The amount reflected assumes the named executive remains totally disabled until age 65 and represents the present value of the monthly benefit payable until age 65.

    55  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  56


    Table of Contents

      Executive Compensation 



    Executive Compensation


    PROXY STATEMENT


          


    Risk Management and Compensation

    A review and assessment of potential compensation-related risks was conducted by the chief risk officer and reviewed by the compensation and succession committee.executive. We believe that our compensation policies and practices are appropriately structured, and that they avoid providing incentives for employees to engage in unnecessary and excessive risk taking.risk-taking. We believe that executive compensation has to be examined in the larger context of an effective risk management framework and strong internal controls. As described in theBoard Role in Risk Oversight section of theCorporate Governance Practices portion of this proxy statement, the Board and auditrisk and return committee both play an important role in risk management oversight, including reviewing how management measures, evaluates, and manages the corporation's exposure to risks posed by a wide variety of events and conditions. In addition, the compensation and succession committee employs an independent compensation consultant each year to review and assess Allstate's executive pay levels, practices, and overall program design.

    57  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


    PROXY STATEMENT
    Executive Compensation — Performance Measures


    Performance Measures for 20122013

    Information regarding our performance measures is disclosed in the limited context of our annual cash incentive awards and performance stock awards and should not be understood to be statements of management's expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.

    The following are descriptions of the performance measures used for our annual cashexecutive incentive awards for 2012 and performance stock awards for the 2012-2014 cycle.compensation. These measures are not GAAP measures. They were developed uniquely for incentive compensation purposes and are not reported items in our financial statements. Some of these measures use non-GAAP measures and operating measures. The Committee has approved the use of non-GAAP and operating measures when appropriate to drive executive focus on particular strategic, operational, or financial factors or to exclude factors over which our executives have little influence or control, such as financial market conditions. control.

    Adjusted Operating Income:    This measure is calculated differently for annual cash incentive awards, the 162(m) pool, and each PSA performance cycle.

    For each plan, Adjusted Operating Income is equal to net income available to common shareholders adjusted to exclude the after-tax effect of the items indicated below for the respective plan:




    Performance Stock Awards



    ü Indicates excluded from Adjusted Operating Income
    Annual Cash
    Incentive
    Awards

    162(m) Pool
    2012-2014
    Performance
    Cycle

    2013-2015
    Performance
    Cycle

    Net income available to common shareholders, excluding:
    Realized capital gains and losses (which includes the related effect on amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs) except for periodic settlements and accruals on certain non-hedge derivative instrumentsüüüü
    Valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged (which includes the related effect on amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs)üüüü
    Business combination expenses and amortization of purchased intangible assetsüüüü
    (Loss) gain on disposition of operationsüüüü
    Restructuring or related chargesüüü
    Underwriting results of Discontinued Lines and Coverages segmentüüüü
    After-tax prepayment feesü
    Preferred stock dividendsü
    Loss on extinguishment of debtüüüü
    Post-retirement benefits curtailment gainüüüü
    Settlement charge related to employee pension benefit plansü
    Reduction in pension benefit cost from employee pension plan changesü
    Adjusted Operating Income before catastrophe adjustment
    Adjustment for after-tax catastrophe lossesInclude
    planned
    amount
    Exclude actual
    amount
    Adjusted to
    include a
    minimum or
    maximum
    amount
    Adjusted to
    include a
    minimum or
    maximum
    amount
    Adjusted Operating Income

    The compensation and succession committee reviews and assesses the measures used each year to ensure alignment with incentive compensation objectives.Allstate Corporation  |  58


    Table of Contents


    Annual Cash Incentive Award Performance Measures for 20122013

    Adjusted Operating Income:    This measure is used to assess financial performance. ItFor a description of how this measure is equalcalculated, see page 58.

    The impact of catastrophe losses on annual cash incentive awards is recognized through a modifier to net income adjusted to exclude the after tax effectsAdjusted Operating Income performance measure payout percentage.

    Actual After-Tax
    Catastrophe Losses

    Impact to Adjusted
    Operating Income
    Payout Percentage

    Within 10% of planned catastrophe lossesNone
    Lower than planned catastrophe losses by more than 10%Increases payout by up to 20%
    Higher than planned catastrophe losses by more than 10%Lowers payout by up to 20%

    In 2013, actual after-tax catastrophe losses of $813 million were less than planned after-tax catastrophe losses by more than 20%, which would have triggered a 20% increase in the Adjusted Operating Income performance measure payout percentage. However, the maximum Adjusted Operating Income performance measure payout percentage had been achieved without application of the items listed below:

    Realized capital gains and losses (which includes the related effect on the amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs) except for periodic settlements and accruals on certain non-hedge derivative instruments.

    Valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged (which includes the related effect on the amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs).

    Business combination expenses and the amortization of purchased intangible assets.

    Gains and losses on disposed operations.

    Adjustments for other significant non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual items, when (a) the nature of the charge or gain is such that it is reasonably unlikely to recur within two years or (b) there has been no similar charge or gain within the prior two years.

    Restructuring or related charges.

    Underwriting results of the Discontinued Lines and Coverages segment.

    Any settlement, awards, or claims paid as a result of lawsuits and other proceedings brought against Allstate subsidiaries regarding the scope and nature of coverage provided under insurance policies issued by such companies.

    Catastrophe losses. Catastrophes are defined and reported in The Allstate Corporation annual report on Form 10-K.

    Prepayment fees (which includes the related effect on the amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs) to be consistent with the incentive measure target.

    Total Premiums:    This measure is used to assess growth within the Allstate Protection and Allstate Financial businesses. It is equal to the sum of Allstate Protection premiums written and Allstate Financial premiums and contract charges as adjusted and described below.

    The Allstate Corporation  --  56


    Table of Contents

    Allstate Protection premiums written is equal to the Allstate Protection segment net premiums written adjusted to replace the actual amount of ceded reinsurance premium written for Allstate's voluntary reinsurance programs and dispositions, if any, with the amount included in the target. Voluntary reinsurance programs include all reinsurance placed through the reinsurance market including through reinsurance brokers and investment bankers, and catastrophe treaties, facultative and quota share agreements, catastrophe bonds, and other types of arrangements. Allstate Protection premiums written is reported in management's discussion and analysis in the annual report on Form 10-K.

    Allstate Financial premiums and contract charges is equal to life and annuity premiums and contract charges reported in the consolidated statement of operations adjusted to exclude premiums and contract charges related to structured settlement annuities.modifier.

    Net Investment Income:    This measure is used to assess the financial operating performance provided from investments. It is equal to net investment income as reported in the consolidated statement of operations, adjusted to eliminate the effects of differences between actual monthly average assets under management (actual AUM) and the monthly average assets under management assumed in determining the company's performance measure target for net investment income (target AUM). It also excludes amounts for prepayment feesIn 2013, the AUM adjustment resulted in a decrease to be consistent with the incentive measure target.net investment income measure.

    Actual net investment income is adjusted by the amount equal to the amount of net investment income included in the company's performance measure target divided by the target AUM timesbased on the difference between the target and actual amounts of AUM. The netAUM, excluding the difference between target and actual amounts of securities lending assets. Net investment income actual result was decreased becausewill be increased using the target portfolio rate if the actual AUM wasis below the target amounts and decreased using market rates at which new investments were originated during the month if the actual AUM is above the target AUM.amount.

    Actual AUM equals the average of the thirteen month end13 month-end total investments, including the beginning and end of the annual period, as reported in the consolidated statement of financial position, adjusted to exclude the unrealized gain (loss) for fixed income, equity, and short term securities and securities lending assets for each month. Total investments is reported quarterly in the consolidated statement of financial position.

    Total Premiums:    This measure is used to assess growth within the Allstate Protection and Allstate Financial businesses. It is equal to the sum of Allstate Protection premiums written and Allstate Financial premiums and contract charges as adjusted and described below.

    Allstate Protection premiums written is equal to the Allstate Protection segment net premiums written. Allstate Protection premiums written is reported in management's discussion and analysis in the annual report on Form 10-K.

    Allstate Financial premiums and contract charges is equal to life and annuity premiums and contract charges reported in the consolidated statement of operations adjusted to exclude premiums and contract charges related to structured settlement annuities.


    Performance Stock Award Performance Measures for the 2012-2014 cyclePerformance Cycle and the 2013-2015 Performance Cycle

    Annual Adjusted Operating Income Return on Equity:    This measure is used to assess financial performance. The annual adjusted operating income return on equityIt is calculated as the ratio of annual adjusted operating incomeAdjusted Operating Income for the applicable PSA performance cycle divided by the average of stockholder'sshareholders' equity excluding the effects of unrealized net capital gains and losses at the beginning and at the end of the year. For a description of how Adjusted Operating Income is calculated, see page 58.

    Annual adjusted operating incomeAdjusted Operating Income is equal to net income adjusted to exclude the after tax effects of the items listed below.

    Realized capital gains and losses (which includes the related effect on the amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs) except for periodic settlements and accruals on certain non-hedge derivative instruments.

    Valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged (which includes the related effect on the amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs).

    Business combination expenses and the amortization of purchased intangible assets.

    Gains and losses on disposed operations.

    Adjustments for other significant non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual items, when (a) the nature of the charge or gain is such that it is reasonably unlikely to recur within two years or (b) there has been no similar charge or gain within the prior two years.

    Underwriting results of the Discontinued Lines and Coverages segment.

    Prepayment fees (which includes the related effect on the amortization of deferred acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs) to be consistent with the incentive measure target.

    In addition in computing annual adjusted operating income ROE, catastrophe losses will be adjusted to reflectinclude a minimum or maximum amount of after-tax catastrophe losses if actual after-tax catastrophe losses are less than $1.1 billion or exceed $1.6 billion.those amounts, respectively. In the 2012 measurement period after tax2013, Adjusted Operating Income was adjusted to include a minimum amount of catastrophe losses were $1.5 billion and did not require adjustment. Catastrophe losses are defined andlosses.

    Net Income:    This measure is used to assess Allstate's financial performance. It is equal to net income available to common shareholders as reported in The Allstate Corporation annual report on Form 10-K.

    Net Income:    Net income will be calculated as reported in The Allstate Corporation annual report on Form 10-K financial statements.

    5759  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


    PROXY STATEMENT
    Director Compensation


    Director Compensation Program Generally

    The following table describes the components of our non-employee director compensation program for 2013. No meeting fees or other professional fees were paid to the directors.

           
       
        

     

     

    Standard RetainerDirector Compensation

     

    PROXY STATEMENT
     

     

    Each non-employee director is paid a quarterly cash retainer of $22,500 on the first day of March, June, September, and December. The retainer is prorated for a director who joins the board during a quarter.
           
    Lead Director RetainerThe lead director is paid an additional quarterly retainer of $6,250 on the same dates as the standard retainer.
    Audit Committee Chair RetainerThe audit committee chair is paid an additional quarterly retainer of $6,250 on the same dates as the standard retainer.
    Other Committee Chair RetainerThe chairs of the following committees are paid an additional quarterly retainer of $5,000 on the same dates as the standard retainer:

    Compensation and succession

    Nominating and governance

    Risk and return

    EquityThe number of restricted stock units granted to each director on June 1 is equal to $150,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of our common stock on such date, rounded to the nearest whole share.


    Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

    Each director is expected, within five years of joining the Board, to accumulate an ownership position in Allstate common stock equal to five times the annual value of the standard retainer.

    Each director has met the ownership guideline, except for Messrs. Crawford and Henkel, who joined the Board in 2013 and have until 2018 to meet the guideline, and Mr. Mehta, who joined the Board in 2014 and has until 2019 to meet the guideline.

    The Allstate Corporation  |  60


    Table of Contents


    2013 Director Compensation

    The following table summarizes the 2013 compensation offor each of our non-employee directors during 2012 for his or her serviceswho served as a member of the Board and its committees. Messrs. Crawford and Henkel areMr. Mehta is not included because theyhe did not join the Board until 2013.2014.

    Name
     Fees Earned or
    Paid in Cash
    ($)

     Stock Awards
    ($)(1)

     Total ($)
      Committee Chair Roles
    Held During 2013

     Fees Earned or
    Paid in Cash
    ($)(1)

     Stock Awards
    ($)(2)(3)

     All Other
    Compensation
    ($)(4)

     Total
    ($)

     
       

    Mr. Ackerman(2)

       110,000     150,006   260,006  Nominating and Governance Committee Chair 113,846 150,026 0 263,872 
       

    Mr. Beyer

       90,000     150,006   240,006  Risk and Return Committee Chair, May-December 105,604 150,026 0 255,630 
       

    Mr. Farrell(3)

       110,000     150,006   260,006 

    Mr. Crawford

     97,418 200,028 0 297,446 
     

    Mr. Farrell

     Compensation and Succession Committee Chair, January-May 27,500 0 5,000 32,500 
       

    Mr. Greenberg

       90,000     150,006   240,006  Compensation and Succession Committee Chair, May-December 105,604 150,026 0 255,630 
     

    Mr. Henkel

     90,000 187,570 0 277,570 
       

    Mr. LeMay

       90,000     150,006   240,006  90,000 150,026 0 240,026 
       

    Ms. Redmond

       90,000     150,006   240,006  90,000 150,026 0 240,026 
       

    Mr. Riley, Jr.(4)

       115,000     150,006   265,006 

    Mr. Riley, Jr.

     Lead Director 115,000 150,026 0 265,026 
       

    Mr. Rowe(5)

       95,687     187,507   283,194 

    Mr. Rowe

     90,000 150,026 0 240,026 
       

    Mr. Smith

       90,000     150,006   240,006  22,500 0 5,000 27,500 
       

    Ms. Sprieser(6)

       115,000     150,006   265,006 

    Ms. Sprieser

     Audit Committee Chair 115,000 150,026 0 265,026 
       

    Mrs. Taylor

       90,000     150,006   240,006  90,000 150,026 0 240,026 
       
    (1)
    The aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units is based onMessrs. Ackerman, Beyer, Crawford, and Greenberg received prorated retainers: Mr. Ackerman received $3,846.15 for nominating and governance committee chair service for the final closing price of Allstate stock as of the date of the grant. The final closing price in part reflects the payment of expected future dividends. (See note 18 to our audited financial statements for 2012.) For the annual restricted stock unit awards granted to each director on June 1, 2012, the final closing price of Allstate stock on the grant date was $33.07. The aggregate grant date fair value of the annual 2012 restricted stock unit awards, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, was $150,006 for each director. The aggregate grant date fair value of the prorated restricted stock unit award granted to Mr. Rowe when he joined the Board in 2012, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, was $37,501 based on a final closing price on the grant date of $30.84. Each restricted stock unit entitles the director to receive one share of Allstate stock on the conversion date. The aggregate number of restricted stock units outstanding asperiod of December 31,22, 2011 to February 29, 2012, for each director is as follows: Ms. Sprieser, Mrs. Taylor,which payment was made in 2013, due to administrative oversight; Messrs. Beyer and Messrs. Ackerman, Farrell, Greenberg LeMay, Riley, and Smith, each 30,261; Mr. Beyer, 26,261; Ms. Redmond, 16,603;because they became committee chairs in May 2013; and Mr. Rowe, 5,752. Restricted stock unit awards granted before September 15, 2008, convert into stock one year after termination of Board service, or upon death or disability if earlier. Restricted stock unit awards granted on or after September 15, 2008, convert into stock upon termination of Board service, or upon death or disability if earlier.


    Non-employee directors do not receive stock options as part of their compensation as a result of a policy change on June 1, 2009. The aggregate number of options outstanding as of December 31, 2012, under prior option awards for each director is as follows: Ms. Sprieser, Mrs. Taylor, and Messrs. Ackerman, Greenberg, LeMay, and Riley, each 24,000; Mr. Beyer, 10,667; Mr. Farrell, 20,000; Ms. Redmond and Mr. Rowe, each 0; and Mr. Smith, 22,666. All of these outstanding stock options were exercisable as of December 31, 2012.

    (2)
    Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee during 2012.

    (3)
    Chair of the Compensation and Succession Committee during 2012.

    (4)
    Lead director during 2012.

    (5)
    Consistent with our practice, Mr. Rowe received a pro-rated payment of his Board retainer in the amount of $5,686.81 and 1,216 restricted stock unit awards whenCrawford because he joined the Board on February 7, 2012.

    (6)
    ChairJanuary 30, 2013. Directors may elect to receive Allstate common stock in lieu of the Audit Committee during 2012.

    The Allstate Corporation  --  58


    Table of Contents

    On March 1, June 1, September 1, and December 1, 2012, each non-employee director received a $22,500 quarterly cash retainer, and each committee chair received an additional $5,000 quarterly cash retainer, except for the audit committee chair, who received an additional $6,250 quarterly cash retainer. The independent lead director received an additional $6,250 quarterly cash retainer. On June 1, 2012, each non-employee director received an annual award of restricted stock unitscash. Also, under the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The number of restricted stock units granted to each director was equal to $150,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of our stock on June 1, 2012, rounded to the nearest whole share. No meeting fees or other professional fees are paid to the directors. Under Allstate's Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, directors may elect to defer their retainers to an account that generates earnings based on (a) the market value of, and dividends paid on, Allstate common shares (common share units); (b) the average interest rate payable on 90-day dealer commercial paper; (c) Standard & Poor's 500 Composite Stock Price Index, with dividends reinvested; or (d) a money market fund. No director has voting or investment powers in common share units, which are payable solely in cash. Subject to certain restrictions, amounts deferred under the plan, together with earnings thereon, may be transferred between accounts and are distributed after the director leaves the Board in a lump sum or over a period not in excess of ten years.years in accordance with the director's instructions.

    (2)
    Aggregate grant date fair value for restricted stock units granted in 2013 based on the final closing price of Allstate common stock on the grant dates, which in part also reflects the payment of expected future dividend equivalent rights. (See note 19 to our audited financial statements for 2013.) Messrs. Crawford and Henkel received prorated awards with grant date fair values of $50,002 and $37,544, respectively, when they joined the Board in 2013. The final grant date closing price was $48.24, except with respect to the pro-rated awards granted to Messrs. Crawford and Henkel when they joined the Board, which was $44.21 and $46.35, respectively. The values were computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. Each restricted stock unit entitles the director to receive one share of Allstate common stock on the conversion date.

    61  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    (3)
    The following table provides outstanding restricted stock units and stock options as of December 31, 2013 for each director.

     Outstanding Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options at Fiscal Year-End 2013
     
       
     Name
     Restricted
    Stock
    Units
    (#)

     Stock
    Options
    (#)

     
       
     

    Mr. Ackerman

      33,371  20,000 
       
     

    Mr. Beyer

      29,371  10,667 
       
     

    Mr. Crawford

      4,241  0 
       
     

    Mr. Farrell

      8,000  0 
       
     

    Mr. Greenberg

      33,371  16,000 
       
     

    Mr. Henkel

      3,920  0 
       
     

    Mr. LeMay

      33,371  20,000 
       
     

    Ms. Redmond

      19,713  0 
       
     

    Mr. Riley, Jr.

      33,371  20,000 
       
     

    Mr. Rowe

      8,862  0 
       
     

    Mr. Smith

      8,000  16,000 
       
     

    Ms. Sprieser

      33,371  16,000 
       
     

    Mrs. Taylor

      33,371  20,000 
       

    Restricted stock unit awards granted before September 15, 2008, convert into common stock one year after termination of Board service, or upon death or disability if earlier. Restricted stock unit awards granted on or after September 15, 2008, provide for delivery of the underlying shares of Allstateconvert into common stock upon the earliertermination of (a) the date of the director'sBoard service, or upon death or disability or (b) the date the director leaves the Board. Restricted stock unit awards granted before September 15, 2008, provide for delivery of the underlying shares of Allstate common stock upon the earlier of (a) the date of the director's death or disability or (b) one year after the date the director leaves the Board.if earlier. Each restricted stock unit includes a dividend equivalent right that entitles the director to receive a payment equal to regular cash dividends paid on Allstate common stock. Under the terms of the restricted stock unit awards, directors have only the rights of general unsecured creditors of Allstate and no rights as stockholders until delivery of the underlying shares.

    In accordance with


    Non-employee directors do not receive stock options as part of their compensation as a result of a policy change on June 1, 2009. All outstanding stock options were exercisable as of December 31, 2013.


    All outstanding options were awarded under the terms of the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which specifies that the exercise price offor the stock option awards is equal to the fair market value of Allstate common stock on the grant date. For options granted in 2007 and 2008, the fair market value is equal to the closing sale price on the date of the grant, and for options granted prior to 2007, fair market value is equal to the average of high and low sale prices on the grant date, and, in each case, if there was no such sale on the grant date, then on the last previous day on which there was a sale. The options became exercisable in three substantially equal annual installments and expire ten years after grant. Stock option repricing is not permitted. An outstanding stock option will not be amended to reduce the option exercise price. However, the plan permits repricing in the event of an equity restructuring (such as a split) or a change in corporate capitalization (such as a merger).



    (4)
    Charitable contributions made by Allstate to entities selected by Messrs. Farrell and Smith in honor of their retirements from the Board.

    As detailed in ourCorporate Governance Guidelines, the corporation maintains stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. Within five years of joining the Board, each director is expected to accumulate an ownership position in Allstate securities equal to five times the value of the annual cash retainer paid for board service. Every director has met the ownership guideline, except for Messrs. Crawford and Henkel, who joined the Board in 2013 and have until January 30, 2018, and March 1, 2018, respectively, to meet the guideline.

    59  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  62


    Table of Contents

      Security Ownership 



    Security Ownership


    PROXY STATEMENT


          


    Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

    The following table shows the number of shares of Allstate common stock beneficially owned by each director and named executive individually, and by all executive officers and directors of Allstate as a group. Shares reported as beneficially owned include shares held indirectly through the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan and other shares held indirectly, as well as shares subject to stock options exercisable on or before April 30, 2013,2014, and restricted stock units with restrictions that expire on or before April 30, 2013.2014. The following share amounts are as of March 1, 2013.2014. As of March 1, 2013,2014, none of these shares were pledged as security.

    Name of Beneficial Owner
     Amount and Nature of
    Beneficial Ownership of
    Allstate Common Stock(1)
    (a)

     Common Stock
    Subject to Options
    Exercisable and
    Restricted Stock Units
    for which restrictions
    expire on or prior to
    April 30, 2013 —
    Included in Column (a)
    (b)

      Amount and Nature of
    Beneficial Ownership of
    Allstate Common Stock(1)
    (a)

     Common Stock
    Subject to Options
    Exercisable and
    Restricted Stock Units
    for which restrictions
    expire on or prior to
    April 30, 2014 —
    Included in Column (a)
    (b)

     

    F. Duane Ackerman

     46,296 24,000  43,346 20,000
     

    Robert D. Beyer

     60,233 10,667  60,233 10,667
     

    Kermit R. Crawford

     0 0  0 0
     

    W. James Farrell

     30,546 20,000 
     

    Jack M. Greenberg

     22,500 20,000  18,500 16,000
     

    Herbert L. Henkel

     0 0  0 0
     

    Ronald T. LeMay

     30,070 24,000  26,070 20,000

    Siddharth N. Mehta

     0 0
     

    Andrea Redmond

     4,000 0  4,000 0
     

    H. John Riley, Jr.

     44,375 24,000  44,375 20,000
     

    John W. Rowe

     6,025 0  6,025 0
     

    Joshua I. Smith

     22,666 22,666 
     

    Judith A. Sprieser

     25,244 24,000  17,244 16,000
     

    Mary Alice Taylor

     46,348 24,000  42,348 20,000
     

    Thomas J. Wilson

     2,722,905 2,375,449  3,089,812 2,716,725
     

    Steven E. Shebik

     279,051 216,092

    Don Civgin

     447,980 408,130  364,628 318,238
     

    Judith P. Greffin

     521,853 473,240  537,461 483,153
     

    Suren K. Gupta

     160 0 
     

    Steven E. Shebik

     267,388 208,424 
     

    Matthew E. Winter

     223,058 203,197  235,773 192,423
     

    All directors and executive officers as a group

     5,547,387 4,762,073  5,773,935 4,901,111
     
    (1)
    As of March 1, 2013,2014, no director or nominee beneficially owned 1% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The directors and executive officers of Allstate as a group beneficially owned (including common stock subject to stock options exercisable and restricted stock units for which restrictions expire on or prior to April 30, 2013)2014) approximately 1.19%1.29% of the common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2013.2014.

    63  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  60


    Table of Contents


    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

    Title of Class
     Name and Address of
    Beneficial Owner

     Amount and Nature of
    Beneficial Ownership

     Percent of
    Class

     
      

    Common

     Northern Trust Corporation
    50 S. LaSalle Street
    Chicago, IL 60603
      25,943,542(1) 5.38%
      
    Title of Class
    Name and Address of
    Beneficial Owner

    Amount and Nature of
    Beneficial Ownership

    Percent of
    Class

    CommonBlackRock, Inc.
    40 East 52nd Street
    New York, NY 10022
    27,833,429(1)6.1%
    CommonNorthern Trust Corporation
    50 S. LaSalle Street
    Chicago, IL 60603
    22,750,671(2)5.0%
    (1)
    As of December 31, 2012.2013. BlackRock held 22,090,893 shares with sole voting power; 50,703 shares with shared voting power; 27,782,726 shares with sole investment power; and 50,703 shares with shared investment power. Information is provided for reporting purposes only and should not be construed as an admission of actual beneficial ownership. BlackRock also manages a small portion of Allstate's investment portfolio under an investment management agreement and has licensed an investment technology software system to Allstate. The terms of these arrangements are customary and the aggregate related fees are not material.

    (2)
    As of December 31, 2013. Held by Northern Trust Corporation together with certain subsidiaries (collectively, "Northern")Northern). Of such shares, Northern held 1,216,5701,120,982 with sole voting power; 24,691,31121,597,430 with shared voting power; 4,005,5173,717,450 with sole investment power; and 5,066,8503,475,311 with shared investment power. 16,878,77115,152,730 of such shares were held by The Northern Trust Company as trustee on behalf of participants in Allstate's 401(k) Savings Plan. Information is provided for reporting purposes only and should not be construed as an admissiona disclosure of actual beneficial ownership.


    Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

    Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Allstate's executive officers, directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent10% of Allstate's common stock to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Based solely upon a review of copies of such reports, or written representations that all such reports were timely filed, Allstate believes that each of its executive officers, directors, and greater than ten-percent10% beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them during 2012.2013 with the exception of Donald Bailey, former President, Emerging Businesses of Allstate Insurance Company, who failed to report timely on a Form 4 the execution of two cashless exercise transactions in November 2013.

    61  --  The Allstate Corporation  |  64


    Table of Contents




    Proposal 3 — Approve Equity Plan


    PROXY STATEMENT


    Proposal 3
    Approval of 2013 Equity Incentive Plan

    We are asking stockholders to approve The Allstate Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan), which amends and restates the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. The Board approved the Plan and recommends approval by stockholders. The Plan is an important part of our pay-for-performance compensation program. The Board considers equity compensation to be a significant component of total compensation for Allstate's officers and other employees.

    To approve the Plan, a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal must be voted "FOR," provided that the total number of votes cast on the proposal represents over 50% of the total outstanding shares. Abstentions will be counted as shares present at the meeting and as votes cast on the proposal and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter or as votes cast on the proposal, but will be counted in the number of outstanding shares. So, failure to instruct your brokerage firm how to vote shares held in a brokerage account could impair our ability to get the Plan approved. If stockholders do not approve Proposal 3, the amendment and restatement of the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan as the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan will not become effective, but the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan will continue to remain in effect.

    GRAPHIC   The Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of the Plan.



    Highlights of the Plan

    üNo discounted awards.Awards that have an exercise price or base value cannot be granted with an exercise price or base value less than the fair market value on the grant date.

    ü


    No evergreen provision.There is no evergreen feature under which the shares authorized for issuance under the Plan can be automatically replenished.

    ü


    No repricing or exchange of stock options or stock appreciation rights.The Plan does not permit repricing of options or stock appreciation rights or the exchange of underwater options or stock appreciation rights for cash or other awards without stockholder approval, except in connection with certain corporate transactions involving Allstate or a change in control.

    ü


    Material amendments that require stockholder approval.Material changes, including increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance, materially modifying participation requirements, and changing the restrictions on repricing require stockholder approval.

    ü


    Administered by an independent committee.The Plan is administered by our compensation and succession committee (Committee), which is made up entirely of independent directors.


    Additional Shares to be Authorized Under the Plan

    As described above, equity compensation is a significant component of the total compensation of our officers and other employees. The Plan supports this overall compensation strategy by providing a means for granting equity awards to attract and retain talent. The material change to the Plan approved by the Committee and the Board is an increase in the number of shares of common stock authorized under the Plan from 70,380,000 shares to 90,230,000 shares. This amounts to a proposed increase of 19,850,000 shares. In addition, the Plan includes 6,815,597 unused shares that were available for awards under a previously terminated plan, The Allstate Corporation Equity Incentive Plan.

    The Allstate Corporation  --  62


    Table of Contents

    Factors Considered

    In setting the number of proposed additional shares issuable under the Plan, the Committee and the Board considered a number of factors. These factors, each of which is discussed in greater detail below, included:

    Shares currently available under the Plan and how long the shares available (both currently and assuming the approval by stockholders of this Proposal 3) are expected to last.

    Historical equity award granting practices, including our three-year average share usage rate (commonly referred to as burn rate).

    Impact of total outstanding equity awards under the Plan.

    Expected value transfer and dilution.

    Compliance with Internal Revenue Code section 162(m).

    Shares Currently Available under the Plan.    As of March 1, 2013, we had 466,636,067 shares of common stock issued and outstanding (not including treasury shares) and 11,094,713 shares of common stock were available for future awards under the Plan, assuming performance stock awards at target (9,522,014 with such awards at maximum). The Committee and the Board considered that the shares currently available under the Plan may not be sufficient to cover future equity awards in the near term if material fluctuations in our stock price or material changes from historical granting practices occur. As of March 1, 2013, the proposed 19,850,000 additional shares would represent approximately 4.3% of the then-issued and outstanding shares of common stock, and, assuming the approval by stockholders of this Proposal 3, the aggregate of approximately 30,944,713 shares available under the Plan would represent approximately 6.6% of the then-issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The proposed additional shares, together with shares currently available under the Plan are expected to be sufficient, based on historical granting practices and the recent trading price of the common stock, to cover awards for approximately four to five years.

    Historical Equity Award Granting Practices.    In setting and recommending to stockholders the increase in the number of shares authorized under the Plan, the Committee and the Board also considered the historical number of equity awards granted under the Plan in the past two years. In 2011 and 2012, we used 6,942,708 and 8,183,435, respectively, of the shares authorized under the Plan to grant equity awards. Further, the Committee and the Board considered our three-year average burn rate of 1.46%, which is lower than the industry thresholds established by certain major proxy advisory firms.

    Burn Rate
     
      

    2012

      1.64% 
      

    2011

      1.46% 
      

    2010

      1.27% 
      

    Three-year average

      1.46% 
      

    Impact of Total Outstanding Equity Awards under the Plan.    The Committee and the Board also considered the total number of equity awards outstanding under the Plan. Since the inception of the Plan in 2001, stockholders have approved the issuance of up to 70,380,000 shares, in addition to 6,815,597 unused shares that were available for awards under a previously terminated plan. The table below lists the total shares authorized under the Plan as of March 1, 2013.

    Total Shares Authorized under the Equity Plan as of
    March 1, 2013

    Total shares authorized under Plan77,195,597(1)
    Shares issued under Plan27,309,881
    Shares needed for outstanding awards40,363,702

    Plan authorized shares needed for restricted stock units that have not yet converted to common stock

    5,959,676(2)

    Unexercised stock options to purchase shares of common stock

    31,258,629

    Plan authorized shares needed for performance stock awards that have not vested and converted to common stock

    3,145,397(2)(3)
    (1)
    Includes 6,815,597 unused shares that were available for awards under a previously terminated plan.

    (2)
    Each share issued on conversion of full value awards is counted against plan authorized shares at a 2.1 to 1.0 ratio.

    (3)
    Represents shares needed for performance stock awards assuming performance for 2012-2014 and 2013-2015 cycles at maximum. Actual performance for 2012 was at maximum. The plan authorized shares needed for 2012 at maximum and other years at target is 1,865,247 shares.

    Authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares may be used to provide common stock for awards. On March 1, 2013, the closing price of our common stock as reported

    63  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape was $46.35.

    Expected Value Transfer and Dilution.    In addition, the Committee and the Board considered the shareholder value transfer and dilution policies of certain institutional investors and major proxy advisory firms. They also considered the fact that the additional 19,850,000 shares proposed to be authorized under the Plan are expected to result in basic dilution of less than 15%. Basic dilution is calculated as shown below.

    Basic=(shares currently available under the
    Plan) + (shares to be issued on exercise
    or conversion of outstanding equity awards
    under the Plan) + (additional shares
    proposed to be authorized under the Plan)

    DilutionTotal number of issued and outstanding
    shares of common stock (excluding
    treasury shares)
    14.26%=(11,094,713) + (35,595,634)
    + (19,850,000)

    466,636,067

    Compliance with Internal Revenue Code section 162(m).    Performance-based awards granted under the Plan are intended to be eligible to qualify as "performance-based compensation" that would be fully deductible under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m). The Committee and the Board further considered that stockholders last approved the Plan in 2009 and that, in order for awards issuable under the Plan to be eligible to qualify as "performance-based compensation" (and therefore qualify for exemption from the tax deduction limitations under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m)), the performance goals and other material terms of the Plan must be approved by stockholders at least every five years.

    In addition to satisfying New York Stock Exchange requirements and requirements under the Internal Revenue Code relating to incentive stock options, stockholder approval of the Plan will also constitute reapproval of the performance goals and other material terms of the Plan in order to be eligible to qualify as "performance-based" compensation for purposes of Internal Revenue Code section 162(m), as described below.


    Summary of 2013 Equity Incentive Plan

    The following is a summary of the material features of the Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Appendix B, which contains the complete text of the Plan.


    Administration

    The Plan provides that the compensation and succession committee or another committee appointed by the Board consisting solely of two or more non-employee members of the Board will administer the Plan. Because the Committee is currently performing administration duties, throughout the following discussion we refer to the administrator as the Committee. The Committee has full and final authority under the Plan to determine eligibility and types and terms of awards and to interpret and administer the Plan. In 2008 the Board delegated to the equity award committee, consisting of the person who at any time holds the office of CEO provided such person is an Allstate director, the authority to grant restricted stock units and nonqualified stock options to eligible employees who are not subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in certain new hire situations, in connection with promotions, and to recognize key contributions that occur between regularly scheduled Committee meetings.


    Prohibition on Repricing and Buy-Outs of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights

    Without stockholder approval, the Committee may not amend outstanding options or stock appreciation rights to reduce the exercise price or base value of the award or cancel options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for either cash or other securities or other awards or options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise price or base value that is less than the exercise price or base value of the original options or stock appreciation rights, except in connection with a change of control or a corporate transaction involving Allstate, including, for example, a stock dividend, stock split, spin off, rights offering, recapitalization through a large, nonrecurring cash dividend, or other transaction or event described in the Plan's award adjustment provisions,


    Eligibility

    Awards may be made to any of our employees or employees of any of our subsidiaries, approximately 38,500 people, who are on the payroll system of Allstate or any of its subsidiaries and who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. In determining which employees will receive awards, the Committee will consider such factors as it deems relevant in order to promote the purposes of the Plan. In 2013, we anticipate

    The Allstate Corporation  --  64


    Table of Contents

    that approximately 800 employees will receive awards under the Plan.


    Types of Awards

    Awards may be in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, unrestricted stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, performance stock, and other awards including the payment of stock in lieu of cash under our other incentive or bonus programs or otherwise and payment of cash based on attainment of performance goals. Share-based awards relate to shares of our common stock. To date, only nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance stock have been granted under the Plan.

    Stock Options

    The Plan permits the Committee to grant nonqualified options and incentive stock options. To date, only nonqualified options have been granted under the Plan. Subject to the limits in the Plan, the Committee has discretion to determine the number of options to be awarded and the terms and conditions of the awards. Each award is evidenced by an agreement that specifies the number of shares subject to the award, the exercise price, the option term and exercise periods, the vesting schedule, and other terms the Committee may deem appropriate such as provisions relating to a change of control and vesting and forfeiture upon a participant's termination of employment. No dividend equivalents may be provided with respect to options.

    The option exercise price may not be less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date, and the option term may not exceed ten years. Options may be exercised by delivery of a notice of intent to purchase a specific number of shares. Payment may be made in cash or its equivalent, by tendering previously acquired shares of common stock, by share withholding, by means of a broker-assisted cashless exercise, or any combination of the foregoing.

    Options may not be granted with a reload feature, which entitles the option holder to receive additional options when exercising options by tendering shares. The Committee may not reprice any options without stockholder approval, including the cancellation of options in exchange for options with a lower exercise price or for cash or other securities (other than in connection with certain corporate transactions involving Allstate or a change in control).

    Stock Appreciation Rights

    The Plan permits the Committee to grant stock appreciation rights. To date, no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the Plan. Subject to the limits in the Plan, the Committee has discretion to determine the number of stock appreciation rights to be awarded and the terms and conditions of the awards. Each award is evidenced by an agreement that specifies the number of shares subject to the award, the base value of the award, the award's term and exercise periods, the vesting schedule, and other terms the Committee may deem appropriate such as provisions relating to a change of control and vesting and forfeiture upon a participant's termination of employment. A stock appreciation right's base value may not be less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date, and a stock appreciation right's term may not exceed ten years. No dividend equivalents may be provided with respect to stock appreciation rights.

    Stock appreciation rights may be granted alone or in tandem with options or in any combination of these forms. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, an employee will receive payment in an amount equal to the product of the excess of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of exercise over the base value multiplied by the number of shares with respect to which the stock appreciation right is exercised. The Committee may not reduce the base value of a stock appreciation right without stockholder approval, including canceling a stock appreciation right in exchange for an award with a lower base value or for cash or other securities (other than in connection with certain corporate transactions involving Allstate or a change in control).

    Unrestricted Stock, Restricted Stock, and Restricted Stock Units

    The Committee may also award restricted and unrestricted shares of our common stock and restricted stock units. Subject to the limits in the Plan, the Committee has discretion to determine the number of shares or units to be awarded and the terms and conditions of the awards. The right to vest or receive distributions or payments with respect to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards may be conditioned upon attainment of performance goals or continued service. Each award is evidenced by an agreement that specifies the number of shares or units being awarded, any restrictions or vesting conditions, any applicable performance goals, and other terms the Committee may deem appropriate such as provisions relating to a change of control and a participant's termination of employment.

    65  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    Restricted stock units may be settled in shares of our common stock or cash of equal value, or a combination of stock and cash.

    During the restricted period, restricted stock and restricted stock units may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated. Employees holding restricted stock may exercise full voting rights with respect to those shares during the restriction period and, subject to the Committee's right to determine otherwise at the time of grant, will receive regular cash dividends during the restricted period. The Committee may include dividend equivalent rights on awards of restricted stock units. With respect to any restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards with performance-based vesting, any dividends or dividend equivalent rights based on the performance-based vesting of such awards are only paid to the participant upon satisfaction of the performance-based vesting conditions.

    Performance Units and Performance Stock

    The Committee may also award performance units and performance stock awards. Subject to the limits in the Plan, the Committee has discretion to determine the number of performance units and performance stock awards to be awarded and the terms and conditions of the awards, including the applicable performance period and specific performance goals. The value of performance stock is based on the fair market value of a share of our common stock. The value of a performance unit is determined in the discretion of the Committee at the time of grant. The extent to which the performance goals are met during the performance periods established by the Committee will determine the number and/or value of performance units or performance stock that will be paid to employees. Payment of the value of earned performance units or performance stock after the end of the performance period will be made in cash or stock having an aggregate fair market value equal to the value of the performance units or performance stock at the end of the performance period, or a combination of stock and cash. The awards may be granted subject to such other restrictions and terms as the Committee determines. Each award is evidenced by an agreement that specifies the number of shares or units being awarded, any restrictions or vesting conditions, the performance goals, and any other terms the Committee may deem appropriate such as provisions relating to a change of control and dividend equivalent rights. To date, no performance units have been granted under the Plan. Any dividends or dividend equivalent rights under such awards are paid to the participant only if the applicable performance goals are achieved.

    Other Awards

    The Committee may grant other awards which may include the payment of stock in lieu of cash, including cash payable under our other incentive or bonus programs, and the payment of cash based on attainment of performance goals established by the Committee. None of these other awards have been granted to date under the Plan.


    Section 162(m); Performance Goals

    Internal Revenue Code section 162(m) generally limits income tax deductions of publicly-traded companies to the extent total compensation (including base salary, annual bonus, stock option exercises) for certain executive officers exceeds $1 million in any one taxable year. Under Section 162(m), the deduction limit does not apply to certain "performance-based" compensation which conforms to certain restrictive conditions stated under the Code and related regulations. The Plan has been structured with the intent that awards granted under the Plan may meet the requirements for "performance-based" compensation and Section 162(m). Options and stock appreciation rights granted under the Plan are intended to qualify as "performance-based" under Section 162(m) so long as they are granted at an exercise price not less than the value of our common stock on the grant date. Other awards under the Plan may qualify as "performance-based" under Section 162(m) if they vest or become payable only upon attainment of pre-established performance goals.

    Certain awards under the Plan may be based on achievement of performance goals. These goals are established by the Committee and will be based on one or more of the following measures: sales, revenues, premiums, financial product sales, earnings per share, stockholder return and/or value, funds from operations, operating income, gross income, net income, combined ratio, underwriting income, cash flow, return on equity, return on capital, return on assets, values of assets, market share, net earnings, earnings before interest, operating ratios, stock price, customer satisfaction, customer retention, customer loyalty, strategic business criteria based on meeting specified revenue goals, market penetration goals, investment performance goals, business expansion goals or cost targets, accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, or similar extraordinary business transactions, profit returns and margins, financial return ratios, market performance, and/or risk-based

    The Allstate Corporation  --  66


    Table of Contents

    capital goals or returns. Performance goals may be measured solely on a corporate, subsidiary, business unit, or other grouping basis, or a combination thereof. Performance goals may reflect absolute entity performance or a relative comparison of entity performance to the performance of a peer group of entities or other external measure.


    Deferral

    The Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit a participant to defer the receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of stock that would otherwise be due to such participant under the Plan. If any such deferral election is permitted, the Committee will establish rules and procedures for the deferrals.


    Equity Incentive Plans of Foreign Subsidiaries

    The Committee may authorize any foreign subsidiary to adopt a plan for granting awards, and awards granted under such foreign plans may be treated as awards under the Plan, if the Committee so determines. In such case, such foreign plans will have such terms and provisions as the Committee permits not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan and which may be more restrictive than those contained in the Plan. Awards granted under such foreign plans are governed by the terms of the Plan except to the extent the provisions of the foreign plans are more restrictive than the terms of the Plan, in which case such terms of the foreign plans control.


    Fungible Pool

    Each share issued pursuant to an option or stock appreciation right (and, if granted before May 19, 2009, any other form of award) will reduce the number of shares available under the Plan by one share, and each share issued pursuant to awards granted on or after May 19, 2009, other than options and stock appreciation rights, will reduce the number of shares available by 2.1 shares. Shares of stock underlying awards that are lapsed or forfeited restricted stock awards, that are expired or canceled, that are settled in cash, or that are otherwise settled without delivery of shares of stock will not be treated as having been issued under the Plan. Shares which are used to pay the exercise price for an option or base value for a stock appreciation right and shares withheld to pay taxes will be treated as having been issued under the Plan. With respect to stock-settled stock appreciation rights, the full number of shares underlying the exercised portion of the stock appreciation right will be treated as having been issued under the Plan (regardless of the number of shares actually used to settle the stock appreciation right upon exercise).


    Limits on Awards

    No more than 5,500,000 shares may be issued pursuant to incentive stock options. So that awards will qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m), the Plan also contains the following per-participant limitations on awards granted under the Plan:

    The total number of shares of stock with respect to which options or stock appreciation rights may be granted in any calendar year to any participant may not exceed 4,000,000 shares.

    The total number of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units intended to qualify as performance-based compensation that may be granted in any calendar year to any participant may not exceed 3,000,000 shares or units, as the case may be.

    The total number of shares of performance stock that may be granted in any calendar year to any participant may not exceed 4,000,000 shares, and the maximum amount payable pursuant to performance units granted in any one calendar year to any participant may not exceed $10,000,000.

    The total number of shares of stock granted pursuant to other awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation in any calendar year to any participant may not exceed 4,000,000 shares.

    The total cash award that is intended to qualify as performance-based compensation that may be paid pursuant to other awards granted in any one calendar year to any participant may not exceed $10,000,000.

    The aggregate value of cash dividends (other than large, nonrecurring cash dividends) or dividend equivalents that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation that a participant may receive in any calendar year may not exceed $11,500,000.


    Elective Share Withholding

    An employee may irrevocably elect to have shares withheld with a fair market value in an amount required to satisfy the minimum federal, state, and local tax withholding requirements upon the exercise of an option or stock appreciation right, the vesting of a restricted stock or restricted stock unit award, or any other taxable event in respect to an award granted under the Plan.

    67  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


    Limits on Transferability

    In general, awards are not assignable or transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Vested portions of nonqualified options may be transferred to certain family members or to a trust, foundation, or any other entity meeting certain ownership requirements. However, in no event may a transfer be made for consideration.


    Forfeitability

    Unless otherwise provided by the Committee or in an award agreement, if a participant has a termination of employment, all awards will terminate and be forfeited on the date of such termination of employment. Typically, the Committee has prescribed that, subject to exceptions for death, disability, and retirement, an employee will forfeit all unexercised vested options three months after termination of employment (unless the Committee determines otherwise), and all other unvested awards will terminate and be forfeited on the date of an employee's termination of employment or failure to achieve specific performance goals.


    Clawback

    In the event of a restatement of our financial results to correct a material error or inaccuracy resulting in whole or in part from the fraud or intentional misconduct of an officer who is subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to the extent permitted by applicable law, we may take such actions as we determine to be appropriate to recover compensation provided to such officer under the Plan, including without limitation cancellation of outstanding awards or recovery of all or a portion of any gain realized upon vesting, settlement, or exercise of an award or recovery of all or a portion of any proceeds resulting from any disposition of shares received pursuant to an award.

    The Plan also contains nonsolicitation covenants that apply to all participants while they are employed and for the one-year period following termination of employment. Noncompetition covenants apply to participants who received awards between February 21, 2012, and May 20, 2013, for the two year period following termination of employment and apply to participants who received awards after May 20, 2013 for the one year period following termination of employment. If a participant violates any of these restrictive covenants, as determined by our Board or a committee of our Board, to the extent permitted by applicable law we may take such actions as we determine to be appropriate to recover compensation provided to the participant under the Plan, including without limitation cancellation of outstanding awards or, upon a violation of the noncompetition covenants, recovery of all or a portion of any gain realized upon vesting, settlement, or exercise of an award or recovery of all or a portion of any proceeds resulting from any disposition of shares received pursuant to an award if the vesting, settlement, or exercise of the award or the receipt of the sale proceeds occurred during the 12-month period prior to the violation.


    Adjustments for Certain Events

    The Committee will make proportional adjustments to the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be delivered under the Plan and to outstanding awards to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, spin-offs, rights offerings, recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, liquidations, or similar events. The Committee may provide in awards for accelerated vesting and other rights in the event of a change of control.


    Amendment, Modification, and Termination of the Plan

    The Board may amend, alter, suspend, or terminate the Plan at any time and in any respect, provided that no amendment will (1) increase the total number of shares of common stock that can be issued under the Plan, (2) materially modify the requirements for participation in the Plan, or (3) materially increase the benefits accruing to employees under the Plan, unless in each instance the amendment is approved by our stockholders. No amendment, modification, or termination of the Plan may materially affect in an adverse way any award then outstanding under the Plan, without an employee's written consent, unless otherwise provided in the Plan or required by applicable law.


    Duration of the Plan

    The Plan will remain in effect until the shares are exhausted or until such earlier time as the Board may determine.


    Federal Income Tax Consequences

    The following is a general summary of the United States federal income tax consequences related to awards that have been or may be granted under the Plan. The federal tax laws may change, and the federal, state, and local tax consequences for any employee will depend upon his or her individual circumstances. This summary does not address all potential tax consequences related to awards,

    The Allstate Corporation  --  68


    Table of Contents

    such as estate and gift taxes, foreign taxes, and state and local taxes.

    Nonqualified Stock Options

    Generally an employee will not have any taxable income, and we are not entitled to any deduction on the grant of a nonqualified stock option. Upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option (or, generally, upon the exercise of an incentive stock option followed by a disqualifying disposition, described below), the employee recognizes ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired over the option exercise price, if any, on the date of exercise. We are generally entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation taxable to the employee as ordinary income, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Any such income is also considered wages and, as such, is subject to income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes. If an employee disposes of shares of our common stock acquired upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option in a taxable transaction, the employee will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the employee's basis in the shares sold and the total amount realized upon disposition.

    Incentive Stock Options

    Generally an employee does not recognize taxable income on the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, and no federal income, Social Security, or Medicare taxes will be withheld upon such grant or exercise. However, the excess of the fair market value on the exercise date over the option exercise price is included in alternative minimum taxable income and thus may trigger alternative minimum tax.

    Upon the disposition of shares of common stock acquired on exercise of an incentive stock option more than one year after the exercise date, and more than two years after the grant date, the employee will normally recognize a capital gain or loss, as the case may be. This gain or loss is measured by the difference between the common stock's sale price and the exercise price. We will not be entitled to a tax deduction on the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option or on the disposition of common stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option.

    If, however, an employee disposes of the shares of common stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option either before the one year period after exercise, or before the two year period after the grant date, the difference between the exercise price of such shares and the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise or (ii) the sale price will constitute compensation taxable to the employee as ordinary income. We are generally allowed a corresponding tax deduction equal to the amount of the compensation taxable to the employee. If the sale price of common stock exceeds the fair market value on the exercise date, the excess will be taxable to the employee as capital gain. We are not allowed a deduction with respect to any such capital gain recognized by the employee.

    Use of Common Stock to Pay Option Exercise Price of Nonqualified Option

    If an employee delivers previously acquired common stock in payment of all or part of the option exercise price of a nonqualified stock option, there will be no recognition of taxable income or loss of any appreciation or depreciation in value of the tendered common stock. The employee's tax basis in, and capital gain holding period for, the tendered stock carries over to an equal number of the option shares received. The fair market value of the shares received in excess of the tendered shares constitutes compensation taxable to the employee as ordinary income. We may be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the compensation income recognized by the employee.

    Use of Common Stock to Pay Option Exercise Price of Incentive Stock Option

    If an employee delivers previously acquired common stock in payment of all or part of the incentive stock option exercise price (other than stock acquired on exercise and not held for the required holding periods), the employee will not recognize as taxable income or loss any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the tendered stock after its acquisition date. The employee's tax basis in, and capital gain holding period for, the tendered stock carries over to an equal number of the option shares received. Shares received in excess of the tendered shares have a tax basis equal to the amount paid, if any, in excess of the tendered shares, and such shares' holding period will begin on the date of exercise.

    If an employee delivers previously acquired common stock that was acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option that was not held for the required holding periods, ordinary income will be recognized by the employee, and we will generally be entitled to a corresponding compensation deduction. The employee's basis in the shares received in exchange for the tendered shares will

    69  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    be increased by the amount of ordinary income recognized.

    Stock Appreciation Rights

    An employee will not have any taxable income on the grant of stock appreciation rights. Upon the exercise of stock appreciation rights, the employee recognizes ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares and cash received. We will be entitled to a corresponding compensation deduction. Any such ordinary income is also considered wages and, as such, is subject to income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes. If stock appreciation rights are settled in shares of our common stock, then upon a subsequent disposition of such shares the employee will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the employee's basis in the shares sold and the total amount realized upon disposition.

    Unrestricted Stock and Restricted Stock Awards

    Generally, an employee will not have any taxable income on the grant of restricted stock, and we will not be entitled to a deduction at the time of grant. When shares of restricted stock are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the employee will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares, less the amount paid, if any, for the shares. Alternatively, an employee may elect to be taxed at the time of grant, in which case the employee will recognize ordinary income on the grant date equal to the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. In either case, we will generally be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the employee. Unless the employee elects to be taxed on the grant date of restricted stock, any dividends paid on restricted stock are taxed as ordinary income (rather than dividend income) to the employee and are deductible by us. If an employee elects to be taxed on the grant date of restricted stock, any dividends paid on the restricted stock will be taxed as dividend income, rather than ordinary income. With respect to unrestricted stock, an employee will recognize ordinary income at the time of grant in an amount equal to the fair market value of the stock on that date, and we will generally be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. Compensation with respect to restricted stock and unrestricted stock is subject to income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes. Upon the disposition of any shares acquired pursuant to an unrestricted stock or restricted stock award, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the employee's basis in the shares sold and the total amount realized upon disposition, will be taxed as capital gain or loss.

    Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, and Performance Stock Awards

    An employee will not have any taxable income on the grant of restricted stock units, performance units, or performance stock. Upon the delivery of shares or payment of cash with respect to restricted stock units, performance units, or performance stock, the employee generally will be required to include as ordinary income in the year of receipt an amount equal to the cash received and/or the fair market value of shares of stock received, and we will be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the same amount. Compensation with respect to restricted stock units, performance units, and performance stock is subject to income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes. If shares of our common stock are received in settlement of any restricted stock units, performance units, or performance stock award, then upon a subsequent disposition of such shares the employee will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the employee's basis in the shares sold and the total amount realized upon disposition.

    Internal Revenue Code Section 409A

    Certain awards under the Plan, depending in part on the specific terms and conditions of such awards, may be considered "non-qualified deferred compensation" subject to the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A, which regulates deferred compensation arrangements. If the terms of such awards do not meet the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A, then the violation may result in an additional 20% tax obligation, plus penalties and interest for such participant.


    Other Information

    New Plan Benefits Resulting From Approval of Plan

    It is not possible at this time to determine the benefits or amounts of awards that will be made in the future as a result of the increased number of shares of common stock authorized and the other revised provisions of the Plan.

    Options Granted Under the Existing Plan

    Since the initial approval of the Plan in 2001 through March 1, 2013, the following number of stock options have been granted to the individuals and groups described in the table. No other options have been granted to any other individuals or groups under the Plan.

    The Allstate Corporation  --  70


    Table of Contents

    Name and Position/Group
    Number of
    Options Granted

    Named Executive Officers

    Thomas J. Wilson (Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer)

    4,003,896

    Steven E. Shebik (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)

    436,155

    Don Civgin (President and Chief Executive Officer, Allstate Financial)

    691,080

    Judith P. Greffin (Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Allstate Insurance Company)

    782,723

    Suren K. Gupta (Executive Vice President — Technology & Operations of Allstate Insurance Company)

    230,942

    Matthew E. Winter (President, Allstate Auto, Home, and Agencies)

    570,857

    All current executive officers as a group(1)

    8,469,615

    All Directors (who are not executive officers) as a group

    0

    Nominees for Director

    0

    All other employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group

    58,905,242
    (1)
    All current reporting officers under Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which includes the Named Executives.

    The entire text of the Plan is set forth in Appendix B.

    GRAPHIC   The Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of The Allstate Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.

    71  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

      



    Securities Authorized for Issuance Under
    Equity Compensation Plans


     

    PROXY STATEMENT


          

    The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2012,2013, about our existing equity compensation plans:

    Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
     
      
    Plan category
     Number of securities to be
    issued upon exercise of
    outstanding options,
    warrants, and rights
    (a)

     Weighted-average
    exercise price of
    outstanding options,
    warrants, and rights
    (b)

     Number of securities remaining
    available for future issuance
    under equity compensation plans
    (excluding securities reflected in
    column (a))
    (c)

     
      
    Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)  34,532,061(2)$39.81  16,242,524(3)
      
    Total  34,532,061(2)$39.81  16,242,524(3)
      
    Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
    Plan category
    Number of securities to be
    issued upon exercise of
    outstanding options,
    warrants, and rights
    (a)

    Weighted-average
    exercise price of
    outstanding options,
    warrants, and rights
    (b)

    Number of securities remaining
    available for future issuance
    under equity compensation plans
    (excluding securities reflected
    in column (a))
    (c)

    Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

    28,243,743(2)$40.6032,297,872(3)

    Total

    28,243,743(2)$40.6032,297,872(3)
    (1)
    Consists of the 20092013 Equity Incentive Plan, which amended and restated the 20012009 Equity Incentive Plan; the Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors; and the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The Corporation does not maintain any equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders.

    (2)
    As of December 31, 2012, 4,452,4192013, 2,839,538 restricted stock units ("RSUs")(RSUs) and 436,660 performance stock awards ("PSAs")1,422,048 PSAs were outstanding. The weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights does not take into account RSUs and PSAs, which have no exercise price. PSAs are calculated at the maximum amount awarded, reduced for forfeitures; the actual number of shares earned may be less and are based upon measures achieved at the end of three separate one-year periods.

    (3)
    Includes 16,032,37732,111,876 shares that may be issued in the form of stock options, unrestricted stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units, performance stock, and stock in lieu of cash under the 20092013 Equity Incentive Plan; and 210,147185,996 shares that may be issued in the form of stock options, unrestricted stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock in lieu of cash compensation under the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.

    65  |  The Allstate Corporation  --  72


    Table of Contents

      



    Proposal 4 — Ratification of Auditors


    PROXY STATEMENT
        

     

    Proposal 3 — Approve Incentive Plan  

       

    Approval of the Material Terms of the Annual Executive Incentive Plan
    GRAPHIC The Board recommends that stockholders vote for the approval of the material terms of the Plan.

    Well-structured market-based program.

    Administered by an independent committee.

    Designed to preserve financial benefits of section 162(m) deduction.

    We are asking stockholders to approve the material terms of The Allstate Corporation Annual Executive Incentive Plan (the Plan). The Board approved the Plan and recommends approval by stockholders. The Plan is an important part of our pay-for-performance compensation program. The Board considers annual cash incentive awards to be a significant component of total compensation for Allstate's executives.

    To approve the Plan, a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal must be voted "FOR." Abstentions will be counted as shares present at the meeting and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter and will have no impact on the vote's outcome.

    If stockholders do not approve the material terms of the Plan, beginning with the 2015 performance year, cash incentive awards in excess of $1 million may not qualify for a tax deduction, and the Committee may consider alternatives for preserving the tax-deductibility of the cash incentive awards.


    Highlights of the Plan

    üAdministered by an independent committee.The Plan is administered by the Committee, which is made up entirely of independent directors.

    ü


    Limit on awards.The maximum annual award intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for any participant is $10 million.

    ü


    Clawback in the event of restatement.Awards to officers made after December 31, 2008 are subject to clawback in the event of certain financial restatements.

    ü


    Intended to preserve financial benefits of section 162(m) tax deduction.The Plan is intended to meet the requirements of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and preserve the financial benefits of the tax deduction under that section.


    Summary of Annual Executive Incentive Plan

    The following is a summary of the material terms of the Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Appendix B, which contains the complete text of the Plan.


    Purpose

    The Plan is important to our ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees. It also allows us to link compensation to the company's annual financial goals and provide participating employees with cash incentive compensation designed to promote the success of our organization. The Plan is intended to permit the granting of awards that will constitute tax-deductible, "performance-based compensation" under the Internal Revenue Code.


    Administration

    The Plan provides that the Committee or another committee appointed by the Board will administer the Plan. Because the Committee currently performs administration duties, throughout the following discussion we refer to the administrator as the Committee. In accordance with the Plan, the Committee has authority to make all determinations it considers necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, including the following:

    Selection of participants.

    Determination of the timing and amount of awards.

    Selection of performance measures and other material terms applicable to awards.

    All decisions of the Committee and its actions with respect to the Plan are binding and conclusive.

    Prior to the payment of any award, the Committee will certify in writing that the performance goals and any other material terms were satisfied.


    Eligibility

    We anticipate that the Committee will select approximately 10-20 officers of Allstate Insurance Company or its affiliates to receive awards on an annual basis. However, all of our employees and employees of our subsidiaries, approximately 39,400

    The Allstate Corporation  |  66


    Table of Contents

    people, are eligible to be selected to receive awards under the Plan.


    Performance Goals

    Awards under the Plan that are intended to qualify as tax-deductible performance-based compensation will be contingent upon the achievement of objective performance goals, which may be expressed as an incentive pool or as separate formulas or standards. The performance goals will be established in writing within 90 days after the beginning of each fiscal year (or, if the service period relating to the award is less than a full year, within the first 25% of such service period) and while the outcome of the performance goals is substantially uncertain.

    The measures of performance for these awards must include one or more of the following: sales; revenues; premiums; financial product sales; earnings per share; stockholder return or value; funds from operations; operating income; gross income; net income; combined ratio; underwriting income; cash flow; return on equity; return on capital; return on assets; values of assets; market share; net earnings; earnings before interest; operating ratios; stock price; customer satisfaction; customer retention; customer loyalty; strategic business criteria based on meeting specified revenue goals, market penetration goals, investment performance goals, business expansion goals or cost targets; accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions or similar extraordinary business transactions; profit returns and margins; financial return ratios; market performance; or risk-based capital goals or returns.

    The performance goals may be measured solely on a corporate, subsidiary, business unit, or other grouping basis, or on a combination of these. Performance goals may reflect absolute entity performance or a relative comparison of entity performance to the performance of a peer group of entities or other external measure. The Committee may condition payment of the amounts that would otherwise be payable due to satisfaction of the preestablished performance goals upon satisfaction of additional objective or subjective goals or standards that it determines to be appropriate. However, it may not increase the amount otherwise payable upon satisfaction of preestablished performance goals. The Committee also may reduce the amount of any award that would otherwise be payable, including a reduction to zero.


    Limit on Awards

    Under the Plan, the maximum annual award intended to qualify as tax-deductible, performance-based compensation for any participant is $10 million. This amount is consistent with the $10 million maximum annual cash award for any participant under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan approved by stockholders in 2013.

    Under the Annual Executive Incentive Plan that was approved by stockholders in 2009, the maximum annual award intended to qualify as tax-deductible performance-based compensation for any participant is $8.5 million.


    Clawback

    In the event of a restatement of our financial results to correct a material error or inaccuracy resulting in whole or in part from fraud or intentional misconduct of an officer who is subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we will review all of the officer's awards paid under the Plan on the basis of having met or exceeded performance measures for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008, to the extent the awards relate to the periods for which the financial statements are restated. If a lesser award would have been paid to the officer based upon the restated financial results, we may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, recover the amount by which the officer's award for the restated period exceeded such lesser award, plus a reasonable rate of interest. To the extent permitted by applicable law, we also may take additional actions deemed by our Board or the Committee to be appropriate, including, without limitation, cancellation of the officer's outstanding award opportunities and recovery of additional amounts relating to prior awards paid to the officer under the Plan.


    Tax-Deductible Performance-Based Compensation

    Awards under the Plan that are not intended to qualify as tax-deductible performance-based compensation may be based on terms and conditions established by the Committee. Such awards may, but need not, be expressed as an incentive pool and may be based upon attainment of the performance measures listed above or other measures or goals the Committee may select. The Committee may condition payment of such awards upon the satisfaction of objective or subjective standards that it determines to be appropriate and may increase or reduce the amount of the award that would otherwise be payable, including a reduction to zero.

    Internal Revenue Code section 162(m) generally limits income tax deductions of publicly traded companies to the extent total compensation (including base salary, annual bonus, stock option exercises) for certain executive officers exceeds $1 million in any one taxable year. The deduction limit does not apply to

    67  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    certain performance-based compensation which conforms to conditions stated under the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. Performance-based awards granted under the Plan that are intended to be eligible to qualify as performance-based compensation may be fully deductible under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m). In order for awards under the Plan to qualify as performance based compensation (and therefore qualify for exemption from the tax deduction limitations under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m)), the material terms of the Plan must be approved by stockholders at least every five years, in addition to satisfaction of other conditions under Internal Revenue Code section 162(m). Stockholders last approved the Plan in 2009.


    Payment of Awards

    All awards will be paid in cash in the year following the year of performance. The Committee may elect, without participant consent, to defer the payment of all or part of one or more awards, provided it establishes the terms of such deferred payment in a manner that does not cause an amount to be subject to taxation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Participants also may be permitted to defer payment of all or part of the awards. Any deferred awards would be paid in accordance with the terms of the applicable deferred compensation arrangement.


    Nonsolicitation

    The Plan also contains nonsolicitation covenants that apply to all participants while they are employed and for one year after termination of employment. If a participant violates any of the nonsolicitation provisions, to the extent permitted by applicable law, we may cancel the participant's outstanding award opportunities and recover prior awards paid under the Plan within the one-year period before the participant first violated the nonsolicitation provisions.


    Future Awards

    Because the determination of whether to make awards, the selection of Plan participants, and the selection of performance measures and other material terms applicable to awards take place each year in the Committee's discretion, it is not possible at this time to determine the benefits or amounts that will be paid under the Plan in the future.


    Amendment and Termination of the Plan

    The Board may, at any time and from time to time, suspend, terminate, modify, or amend the Plan. However, the Board will not make any amendment without stockholder approval if this approval is required to maintain the qualification of awards as performance-based compensation pursuant to Section 162(m).

    The entire text of the Plan is set forth in Appendix B.

    The Allstate Corporation  |  68


    Table of Contents

    Proposal 4 — Ratification of Auditors
    PROXY STATEMENT


    Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountant
    GRAPHICThe Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Allstate's independent registered public accountant for 2014.

    Independent with few ancilliary services.

    Reasonable fee.

    Deloitte & Touche has been Allstate's independent registered public accountant since Allstate became a publicly traded entity in 1993. In fulfillment of the audit committee's obligations to assist the Board in its oversight of the integrity of Allstate's financial statements and other financial information, the audit committee has established strong practices to evaluate the qualifications, performance, and independence of the independent registered public accountant both on an ongoing basis throughout the year, and through the completion of an annual evaluation.

    As a starting point for the annual evaluation, a survey is administered by a Deloitte & Touche partner who is not affiliated with the Allstate account and by our chief risk executive to assess Allstate's general satisfaction with the quality and efficiency of the services provided. The results of this survey are reported by the chief risk executive to the audit committee for its discussion and analysis.

    In addition, the audit committee reviews and discusses the results of the firm's reports on its quality controls and external assessments, including results of inspections conducted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

    Rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm is explicitly considered each year by the committee in addition to the regular mandated rotation of audit partners.

    Based on the results of these reviews, the audit committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as Allstate's independent registered public accountant for 2013. The Board submits the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to stockholders for ratification, consistent with its longstanding practice. If Deloitte & Touche is not ratified by the stockholders, the committee may reconsider its selection. Deloitte & Touche LLP has been Allstate's independent registered public accountant continuously since 1993.2014.

    The audit committee has adopted aPolicy Regarding Pre-Approval of Independent Registered Public Accountant's Services. (See Appendix C.) All services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP in 20122013 and 20112012 were approved by the committee. To ensure continuing auditor independence, the committee periodically considers whether there should be a rotation of the independent registered public accountant. Further, in conjunctionaccordance with the mandated rotation of the independent registered public accountant's lead engagement partner, the committee and its chair are directly involved in the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP's new lead engagement partner.pre-approval policy.

    The following fees have been, or are anticipated to be, billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates, for professional services rendered to Allstate for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2012,2013, and December 31, 2011.2012.


     2012
     2011(5)
      2013
     2012(5)
     
       

    Audit fees(1)

     $9,224,695 $9,185,288  $9,621,085 $9,292,002 
       

    Audit-related fees(6)(2)

     $1,187,000 $1,620,400  $1,632,977 $1,187,000 
       

    Tax fees(3)

     $6,000 $26,000  $226,000 $6,000 
       

    All other fees(4)

        $201,750  
       

    Total fees

     $10,417,695 $10,831,688  $11,681,812 $10,485,002 
       
    (1)
    Fees for audits of annual financial statements, reviews of quarterly financial statements, statutory audits, attest services, comfort letters, consents, and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The amount disclosed does not reflect separate account audit fees expected to be reimbursed by non-Deloitte entitiesthe managing entity in the amounts of $253,400$304,000 and $607,600$297,400 for 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively. Reimbursements increased in 2011 largely due to the sharing

    69  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of certain Esurance acquisition-related audit fees with the White Mountains Insurance Group.

    Contents

    (2)
    Audit-related fees are for professional services, such as accounting consultations on new accounting standards, internal control reviews, and audits and other attest services for non-consolidated entities (e.g., employee benefit plans, various trusts, The Allstate Foundation) and are set forth below.

      
     2012
     2011
     
       
     

    Audits and other attest services for non-consolidated entities

      $412,000  $347,000 
       
     

    Adoption of new accounting standards

      $72,000  $307,000 
       
     

    Other audit-related fees

      $703,000  $966,400 
       
     

    Audit-related fees(6)

      $1,187,000  $1,620,400 
       
      
     2013
     2012
     
       
     

    Audits and other attest services for non-consolidated entities

      $422,000  $412,000 
       
     

    Adoption of new accounting standards

        $72,000 
       
     

    Other audit-related fees

      $1,210,977  $703,000 
       
     

    Total audit-related fees

      $1,632,977  $1,187,000 
       
    (3)
    Tax fees include income tax return preparation and compliance assistance.

    (4)
    "All other fees" would includeincludes all fees paid to the principal auditor other thanthat are not audit, audit-related, or tax services. In 2013, these fees relate to preparation for a market conduct exam and translation advisory services. There were no fees in this category in 2012 and 2011.2012.

    73  --  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    (5)
    Total fees for 20112012 have been decreased by $276,312adjusted to primarily reflect a reductionan increase of estimated fees relating to work performed$67,307 for scope changes not included in 2012.

    (6)
    Audit related fees increased in 2011 primarily due to the acquisitionprior year's proxy statement, which does not reflect the partial reimbursement of Esurance.$44,000 of these fees.

    Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the 20132014 annual meeting to respond to questions and may make a statement if they choose. To be approved, a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal must be voted "FOR." Abstentions will be counted as shares present at the meeting and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal.

    GRAPHIC   The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Allstate's independent registered public accountant for 2013.


    Audit Committee Report

    Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte) was Allstate's independent registered public accountant for the year ended December 31, 2012.2013.

    The audit committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.2013.

    The committee discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by the statement of Auditing StandardsStandard No. 61, as amended (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380)16, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

    Board. The committee received the written disclosures and letter from Deloitte required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Deloitte's communications with the committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence.

    Based on these reviews and discussions and other information considered by the committee in its judgment, the committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in Allstate's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2013, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and furnished to stockholders with this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

    Judith A. Sprieser (Chair)
      F. Duane Ackerman
    Robert D. Beyer
    Jack M. Greenberg
     Ronald T. LeMayKermit R. Crawford
    Mary Alice Taylor
      

    The Allstate Corporation  --|  7470


    Table of Contents

      Stockholder Proposals 



    Stockholder Proposals


    PROXY STATEMENT


          

       
    Proposal 5

    Stockholder proposal on equity retention by senior executives
    GRAPHICThe Board recommends that stockholders vote against this proposal.

    Existing stock ownership guidelines require significant equity ownership.

    Named executives' equity holdings exceed stock ownership guidelines.

    Retention guidelines were expanded for all prospective grants beginning in 2014.

    Mr. Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Ave., 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021, beneficial owner of 2,700no less than 500 shares of Allstate common stock as of December 12, 2012,10, 2013, intends to propose the following resolution at the annual meeting.

    To be approved, a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal must be voted "for." Abstentions will be counted as shares present at the meeting and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter and will have no impact on the vote's outcome.

    The Board of Directors does not support the adoption of this proposal and asks stockholders to consider management's response following the proponent's statement.The Board recommends that stockholders voteagainstthis proposal.

    Proposal 5 — Executives To Retain Significant Stock

    Resolved: Shareholders requesturge that our executive pay committee adopt a policy requiring that senior executives to retain a significant percentage of shares acquired through equity pay programs until reaching normal retirement age.age and to report to shareholders regarding the policy before our Company's next annual meeting. For the purpose of this policy, normal retirement age shallwould be definedan age of at least 60 and determined by the Company's qualified retirement plan that has the largest number of plan participants. The shareholdersour executive pay committee. Shareholders recommend that the committee adopt a share retention percentage requirement of 25%50% of suchnet after-tax shares.

    TheThis single unified policy shouldshall prohibit hedging transactions for shares subject to this policy which are not sales but reduce the risk of loss to the executive. Otherwise our directors would be able to avoid the impact of this proposal. This policy shall supplement any other share ownership requirements that have been established for senior executives, and should be implemented so as not to violate our Company's existing contractual obligations or the terms of any pay or benefit plan currently in effect.

    Requiring senior executives to hold a significant portion of stock obtained through executive pay plans would focus our executives on our company's long-term success. A Conference Board Task Force report on executive pay stated that hold-to-retirement requirements give executives "an ever-growing incentive to focus on long-term stock price performance."

    It mayThis proposal should also be helpfulmore favorably evaluated due to consider this proposal in the context of our Company's overallclearly improvable corporate governance performance as reported in 2012:2013:

    GMI/The Corporate Library,GMI Ratings, an independent investment research firm, downgradedrated our company to "D" with "High Governance Risk." Also "High Concern" in director qualifications and "High Concern" in Executive PayF for executive pay — $11$17 million for our CEO Thomas Wilson.

    AnnualWilson and shareholders faced a potential 10% stock dilution. GMI said Allstate could give long-term incentive pay to Mr. Wilson for below-median performance. Plus Mr. Wilson had an excessive pension compared to peers.

    In regard to our highest paid executives included a bonus pool with actual amounts given subjectively — undermining pay-for-performance. Long-term incentive pay consisted of market-priced stock options. Market-priced stock options could pay offdirectors Judith Sprieser was negatively flagged by GMI due to a rising market alone, regardless of an executive's job performance. Mr. Wilson was potentially entitled to $22 million under a change in control.

    Seven of our directors had 10 to 14 years long-tenure. Long-tenured directors controlled 14 of the 19 seats on our most powerfulher director duties at USG Corporation board committees. Director independence erodes after 10-years. GMI said long-tenure could hinder director ability to provide effective oversight. A more independent perspective would be a priceless assetwhen it filed for our directors.

    Judith Sprieser, our audit committee chair, was involved with the USG Corporation bankruptcy. Ronald LeMay also on our audit committee, was involved withhad director duties at Sprint when Sprint tried to give $1.7 billion in stock options while the merger with Worldcom was falling apart. Mr.sinking. For some reason Both Sprieser and LeMay was alsowere put on our executive payaudit committee even after his dubious executive pay episode with Sprint. Seated with Mr. LeMayand had a total of 4 seats on our executive pay committee was James Farrell who was involved withmost important board committees.

    John Riley, our Lead Director, had 15-years long-tenure and such long-tenure leads to just the UAL Corporation bankruptcy. Sixopposite of our directors were potentially overboarded — each working on the boards of 3 to 5 large companies.

    Judith Sprieserincreased independence. Jack Greenberg received our highest negative votes except for Jack Greenberg, whoand was also on our audit committee. Joshua Smith received our 3rdover-burdened with director duties at 5 companies. Judith Sprieser was next highest in negative votes and was onover-burdened with director duties at 6 companies.

    Returning to the core topic of this proposal from the context of our executive pay and nomination committees.

    Pleaseclearly improvable corporate performance, please vote to protect shareholder value:

    Executives To Retain Significant Stock — Proposal 5


    7571  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    The Board recommends that stockholders voteagainst AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

    Allstate executives already have significant equity ownership.

    The Board agrees that its executives' interests should be aligned with those of stockholders. That's why — since 1996 — Allstate already has stringenthad significant executive stock ownership guidelines in place.

    Under those guidelines, our CEO must own Allstate common stock worth at least six times his base salary, and each other named executive must own at least three times his or her base salary.

    As shown below, each of our named executives exceeds these guidelines.

    Stock Ownership as Multiple of Base Salary
    as of December 31, 2013

     
      
    Named Executive
     Guideline
     Actual
     
      

    Mr. Wilson

      6  20 
      

    Mr. Shebik

      3  6 
      

    Mr. Civgin

      3  4 
      

    Ms. Greffin

      3  5 
      

    Mr. Winter

      3  4 
      

    Allstate recently increased its equity retention requirements.    In response to feedback from stockholders last year, equity retention guidelines were expanded in 2014 for all future equity grants.

    GRAPHICExpanded Requirements

    Under theThe proposal an executive would reach his or her salary multiple guideline more slowly than under Allstate's existing stock ownership guidelines. Under Allstate's existing stock ownership guidelines, it is estimated that a new executive would reach the salary multiple guideline in six years while in contrast, under the proposal, it would take approximately 11 years for an executive to reach the same level of stock holdings through equity awards granted by Allstate, assuming that the performance stock awards payout at target levels.

    Existing vesting schedules promote executives' focus on long-term performance. In addition to Allstate's existing stock ownership guidelines, Allstate's vesting schedules for equity awards further align the interests of executives and stockholders, and they motivate executives to focus on long-term performance. Option awards vest over four years: 50% on the second anniversary date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversary dates. Performance stock awards vest in one installment on the third anniversary of the grant date. Retirement does not accelerate executives' ability to exercise option awards or sell performance stock awards, so Allstate's performance continues to financially impact executives after retirement.

    Proposal concept and structure is flawed and has undesirable consequences.

    The proposal would require executivesan executive to retain Allstate stock until he or she reaches "normal retirement age, even after leaving" a date entirely unrelated to the company. The youngest Allstate senior executive is 35 years old. Under the proposal, if this executive were to leave Allstate this year, he would be required to hold a portion of his equity awards until he reaches age 65 in 2042, almost three decades after he had any influence over Allstate's performance.executive's actual employment status with Allstate.

    The proposal recommends a ban on hedging transactions, but Executives reach their stock ownership guidelines more quickly under Allstate's current requirements than under the proposal. A new senior executive would reach the stock ownership guideline in approximately five years under Allstate's guidelines and in approximately six years under the proposal.

    Allstate already has a policy that prohibits all officers, directors, and employees from engaging in transactions in Allstate stock that might be considered speculative or hedging, such as selling short or buying or selling options.

    The Allstate Corporation  --|  7672


    Table of Contents

       
    Proposal 6

    Stockholder proposal on reporting lobbying expenditures
    GRAPHICThe Board recommends that stockholders vote against this proposal.

    Board oversees and reviews public policy initiatives.

    Allstate already provides significant transparency through public policy report.

    Less than 10% of shares voted supported a similar proposal in 2013.

    The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations Reserve Fund, 815 Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington, DC, 20006, beneficial owner of 360345 shares of Allstate common stock as of December 11, 2012,9, 2013, intends to propose the following resolution at the annual meeting.

    To be approved, a majority ofWhereas, corporate lobbying exposes our company to risks that could adversely affect the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meetingcompany's stated goals, objectives, and entitled to voteultimately shareholder value, and

    Whereas, we rely on the proposal must be voted "for." Abstentions will be counted as shares present atinformation provided by our company to evaluate goals and objectives, and we, therefore, have a strong interest in full disclosure of our company's lobbying to assess whether our company's lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and in the meetingbest interests of shareholders and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter and will have no impact on the vote's outcome.

    The Board of Directors does not support the adoption of this proposal and asks stockholders to consider management's response following the proponent's statement.The Board recommends that stockholders voteagainstthis proposal.long-term value.

    Resolved:Resolved, Shareholdersthe shareholders of The Allstate Corporation ("Allstate") urgerequest the Board of Directors (the "Board") to authorize the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:

    1.
    Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.

    2.
    Payments by Allstate used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.

    3.
    Allstate's membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

    4.
    Description of the decision making process and oversight by management and the Board for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

    For purposes of this proposal, a "grassroots lobbying communication" is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. "Indirect lobbying" is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which Allstate is a member.

    Both "direct and indirect lobbying" and "grassroots lobbying communications" include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

    The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee of the Board or other relevant oversight committees of the Board and posted on Allstate's website.

    Supporting Statement

    We encourage our Board to require comprehensive disclosure related to direct, indirect and grassroots lobbying. Corporate lobbying can expose Allstate to risks that could affect the company's stated goals, objectives, and ultimately shareholder value. Shareholders have a strong interest in full disclosure of our company's lobbying to assess whether Allstate's lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and in the best interests of shareholders.

    As shareholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in the use of staff time and corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation both directly and indirectly. We believe such disclosure is in shareholders' best interests. Absent a system of accountability, company assets could be used for objectives contraryAccording to Allstate's long-term interests.

    According to2012 Corporate Responsibility Report, our company spent $15.6 million on "the public policy process at the state and federal levels." The Center for Responsive Politics reports that Allstate spent $3.3$2.9 million onin direct federal lobbying activities in 2011. (http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000632&year=2011). These figures do2012 — but this may not include lobbying expenditures in states.grassroots lobbying. Allstate also had 109 lobbyists in 39 states in 2011, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics. (http://www.followthemoney.org/database/lobbyistclient.phtml?lc=101065&y=2011&s=0#11ink). states.

    Allstate also contributed almost $3.2 million to national trade associations in 2011, of which $1.5 million was attributed to lobbying efforts, according to the Allstate Corporate Involvement in Public Policy 2011 Annual Report. (http://www.allstate.com/Allstate/content/refreshattachments/Social-Responsibility/Allstate_CIPP_2011.pdf).

    We welcome the fact that Allstate has disclosed the total amount of its 2011 lobbying contributions, including the names of trade associations that Allstate is a member. However, Allstate hasdoes not disclosed a breakdown ofdisclose how much it contributes to each individual trade association for lobbying activities. We believe that providing this information will ensure thatlobbying. For example, Allstate is fully transparenta member of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which spent more than $136 million on lobbying in 2012. Moreover, Allstate does not disclose membership in or contributions to tax-exempt organizations that write and accountable to shareholders for its lobbying activities.endorse model legislation, such as the American Legislative Exchange Council.

    For these reasons, weWe urge you to vote FOR this resolution.proposal.


    7773  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    The Board recommends that stockholders voteagainst AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

    Allstate's Board has strong governance practices that ensure transparency over our public policy involvement. OurCorporate Governance Guidelines address our involvement in the public policy arena, which includes lobbying activities, and the Board's annual review of the expenditure of Allstate resources on public policy initiatives.

    Allstate already provides stockholders with comprehensive disclosure on Allstate's involvement in the public policy arena on allstate.com.arena.

    Our existingannual public policy report details Boardincludes information on our Board's oversight of expenditures, the strategic and business rationale for expenditures, expenditurestotal amounts contributed by activity (including non-deductible amounts for certain lobbying activities and to political expenditures)candidates and organizations), the individuals involved in the decision-making process, and the organizations supported.

    Allstate has an obligation to stay informed about In conversations with our investors last year, several indicated that our report provides appropriate detail and participate in the public policy process, including lobbying, to serve the interests of the corporation, its stockholders, customers, and employees, as well as Allstate agency owners.

    Allstate understands that transparency and accountability about corporate lobbying is important to you. That's why we provide figures related to trade association membership and lobbying expenditures in our report.

    Publicly available disclosures already provide extensive information about Allstate's lobbying expenditures, as is so clearly demonstrated by the proponent's reference to figures on expenditures previously made by Allstate.

    Our policy on political contributions is part of ourCorporate Governance Guidelines, available on allstate.com.

    The proposal seeks unnecessary line-itema model for disclosure of lobbyingthese expenditures.  Providing additional detailed disclosure could potentially subject Allstate to unwarranted criticism and negative publicity and could put Allstate under pressure to disassociate from certain trade associations or to refrain from opportunities to advocate for policies that are in the best interests of the corporation and its stockholders, customers, and employees, as well as Allstate agency owners.

    Allstate fully complies with all disclosure requirements pertaining to political contributionslobbying under federal, state, and local laws. The proposal would impose requirements on Allstate that are not dictated by law and that are not standard among other companies. Any new

    The proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of expenditures, which could be used by special interest groups to pressure Allstate to stop advocating for positions that are in the best interest of the corporation, stockholders, customers, employees, and Allstate agency owners.

    Less than 10% of shares voted supported a similar proposal at last year's annual meeting.

    The Allstate Corporation  |  74


    Table of Contents


    Stockholder proposal on reporting political expenditures
    GRAPHICThe Board recommends that stockholders vote against this proposal.

    Board oversees and reviews public policy initiatives.

    Allstate already provides significant transparency through public policy report.

    Less than 10% of shares voted supported a similar proposal in 2013.

    The Comptroller of the State of New York, Thomas P. DiNapoli, the sole Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund (the "Fund") and the administrative head of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System and the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System, 633 Third Avenue-31st Floor, New York, 10017, beneficial owner of 1,937,554 shares of Allstate common stock as of December 4, 2013, intends to propose the following resolution at the annual meeting.

    Resolved, that the shareholders of Allstate Corporation ("Company") hereby request that the Company provide a report, updated semiannually, disclosing the Company's:

    1.
    Policies and procedures for making, with corporate funds or assets, contributions and expenditures (direct or indirect) to (a) participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, or (b) influence the general public, or any segment thereof, with respect to an election or referendum.

    2.
    Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used in the manner described in section 1 above, including:

    a.
    The identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each; and

    b.
    The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible decision-making.

    The report shall be presented to the board of directors or relevant board committee and posted on the Company's website.

    Payments used for lobbying are not encompassed by this proposal.

    Supporting Statement

    As long-term shareholders of Allstate, we support transparency and accountability in corporate spending on political activities. These include any activities considered intervention in any political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect contributions to political candidates, parties, or organizations; independent expenditures; or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state or local candidates.

    Disclosure is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders and critical for compliance with federal ethics laws. Moreover, the Supreme Court'sCitizens United decision recognized the importance of political spending disclosure for shareholders when it said, "[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages." Gaps in transparency and accountability may expose the company to reputational and business risks that could threaten long-term shareholder value.

    Allstate contributed at least $6,335,152 in corporate funds since the 2003 election cycle. (CQ: http://moneyline.cq.com and National Institute on Money in State Politics: http://www.followthemoney.org)

    Relying on publicly available data does not provide a complete picture of the Company's political spending. For example, the Company's payments to trade associations used for political activities are undisclosed and unknown. In some cases, even management does not know how trade associations use their company's money politically. The proposal asks the Company to disclose all of its political spending, including payments to trade associations and other tax exempt organizations used for political purposes. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading companies, including Exelon, Merck and Microsoft that support political disclosure and accountability and present this information on their websites.

    The Company's Board and its shareholders need comprehensive disclosure to be able to fully evaluate the political use of corporate assets. We urge your support for this critical governance reform.


    75  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    The Board recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

    Allstate's Board has strong governance practices that ensure transparency over our public policy involvement. OurCorporate Governance Guidelines address our involvement in the public policy arena, which includes lobbying activities, and the Board's annual review of the expenditure of Allstate resources on public policy initiatives.

    Allstate already provides stockholders with comprehensive disclosure on Allstate's involvement in the public policy arena.

    Our annual public policy report includes information on our Board's oversight of expenditures, the strategic and business rationale for expenditures, total amounts contributed by activity (including non-deductible amounts for certain lobbying activities and to political candidates and organizations), the individuals involved in the decision-making process, and organizations supported. In conversations with our investors last year, several indicated that our report provides appropriate detail and is a model for disclosure of these expenditures.

    Allstate fully complies with all disclosure requirements shouldpertaining to political expenditures under federal, state, and local laws. The proposal would impose requirements on Allstate that are not dictated by law and that are not standard among other companies.

    The proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of expenditures, which could be addressedused by lawmakersspecial interest groups to pressure Allstate to stop advocating for positions that are in the best interest of the corporation, stockholders, customers, employees, and uniformly imposedAllstate agency owners.

    Less than 10% of shares voted supported a similar proposal at last year's annual meeting.


    Counting of Votes for Stockholder Proposals

    To be approved, a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on all entities.the stockholder proposal must be voted "for." Abstentions will be counted as shares present at the meeting and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter and will have no impact on the vote's outcome.


    Stockholder Proposals for the 20142015 Annual Meeting

    Proposals that stockholders would like to include in Allstate's proxy materialmaterials for presentation at the 20142015 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Office of the Secretary, The Allstate Corporation, 2775 Sanders Road, Suite A2W, Northbrook, Illinois 60062-6127 by December 11, 2013,8, 2014, and must otherwise comply with Securities and Exchange Commission rules in order to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy material for the 20142015 annual meeting.

    If a stockholder would like to bring a matter before the meeting which is not the subject of a proposal that meets the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission proxy rule requirements for inclusion in the proxy statement, the stockholder must follow procedures in Allstate's bylaws in order to personally present the proposal at the meeting. A copy of these procedures is available upon request from the Office of the Secretary or can be accessedfound on Allstate's website, www.allstate.com.allstate.com. One of the procedural requirements in the bylaws is timely notice in writing of the business the stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting. Notice of business proposed to be brought before the 20142015 annual meeting must be received by the Office of the Secretary no earlier than the close of business on January 21, 2014,20, 2015, and no later than February 20, 2014.19, 2015. Among other things, the notice must describe the business proposed to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting the business at the meeting, and any material interest of the stockholder in the business.

    The Allstate Corporation  --|  7876


    Table of Contents

      Other Items 



    Other Items


    PROXY STATEMENT


          

    Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan Participants

    If you hold Allstate common shares through the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan, your proxy card/voting instruction form for those shares will instruct the plan trustee how to vote those shares. If you received your annual meeting materials electronically, and you hold Allstate common shares both through the plan and also directly as a registered stockholder, the voting instructions you provide electronically will be applied to both your plan shares and your registered shares. If you return a signed proxy card/voting instruction form or vote by telephone or the Internet on a timely basis, the trustee will follow your voting instructions for all Allstate common shares allocated to your plan account unless that would be inconsistent with the trustee's duties.

    If your voting instructions are not received on a timely basis, the shares allocated to your plan account will be considered "unvoted." If you return a signed proxy card/voting instruction form but do not indicate how your shares should be voted on a given matter, the shares represented by your proxy card/voting instruction form will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends. The trustee will vote all unvoted shares and all unallocated shares held by the plan as follows:

    If the trustee receives instructions (through voting instruction forms or through telephonic or Internet instruction) on a timely basis for at least 50% of the votable allocated shares in the plan, then it will vote all unvoted shares and unallocated shares in the same proportion and in the same manner as the shares for which timely instructions have been received, unless to do so would be inconsistent with the trustee's duties.

    If the trustee receives instructions for less than 50% of the votable allocated shares, the trustee will vote all unvoted and unallocated shares in its sole discretion. However, the trustee will not use its discretionary authority to vote on adjournment of the meeting in order to solicit further proxies.

    Plan votes receive the same high level of confidentiality as all other votes.    You may not vote the shares allocated to your plan account by voting in person at the meeting. You must instruct The Northern Trust Company, as trustee for the plan, how to vote your shares.


    Proxy Statement and Annual Report Delivery

    Allstate has adopted the "householding" procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which allows us to deliver one set of documents to a household of stockholders instead of delivering a set to each stockholder in a household, unless we have been instructed otherwise. This procedure is more environmentally friendly and cost-effective because it reduces the number of copies to be printed and mailed. Stockholders who receive proxy materials in paper form will continue to receive separate proxy cards/voting instruction forms to vote their shares. Stockholders who receive the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will receive instructions on submitting their proxy cards/voting instruction form via the Internet.

    If you would like to change your householding election, request that a single copy of the proxy materials be sent to your address, or request a separate copy of the proxy materials, please contact our distribution agent, Broadridge Financial Solutions, by calling (800) 542-1061 or by writing to Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. We will promptly deliver the proxy materials to you upon receipt of your request. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker, or other record holder to request information about householding.

    If you receive more than one proxy card/voting instruction form, your shares probably are probably registered in more than one account or you may hold shares both as a registered stockholder and through the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan. You should vote each proxy card/voting instruction form you receive.

    7977  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    Procedures for Attending the Annual Meeting in Person

    If you plan to attend the meeting, you must be a holder of Allstate shares as of the record date of March 22, 2013.21, 2014. We encourage you to request an admission ticket in advance. You may request admission tickets by:

    Visiting www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided or calling 1-888-247-6053. You will need the 12-digit control number included on your proxy card, voter instruction form, or notice.

    At the entrance to the meeting, we will request to see your admission ticket and valid photo identification, such as a driver's license or passport.

    If you do not request an admission ticket in advance, at the entrance to the meeting we will request to see your photo identification.identification at the entrance to the meeting. We will then determine if you owned common stock on the record date by:

    Verifying your name and stock ownership against our list of registered stockholders; or

    Asking to review evidence of your stock ownership as of March 22, 2013,21, 2014, such as your brokerage statement.You must bring such evidence with you in order to be admitted to the meeting.

    If you are acting as a proxy, we will need to review a valid written legal proxy to you signed by the owner of the common stock.stock granting you the required authority to vote the owner's shares.


    Proxy Solicitation

    Officers and other employees of Allstate and its subsidiaries may solicit proxies by mail, personal interview, telephone, facsimile, electronic means, or via the Internet. None of these individuals will receive special compensation for soliciting votes, which will be performed in addition to their regular duties, and some of them may not necessarily solicit proxies. Allstate also has made arrangements with brokerage firms, banks, record holders, and other fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares they hold on your behalf. Allstate will reimburse these intermediaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Georgeson Inc., 480 Washington Boulevard,Blvd., 26th Floor, Jersey City, NJ 07310 has been retained to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee not to exceed $16,500 plus expenses. Allstate will pay the cost of all proxy solicitation.

      By order of the Board,

     

     


    GRAPHICLOGO

     

     

    Mary J. McGinnSusan L. Lees
    Secretary

     

     

    Dated: April 10, 20137, 2014

    The Allstate Corporation  --|  8078


    Table of Contents

      Appendix A 



    Appendix A


    PROXY STATEMENT


          


    Appendix A

    Categorical Standards of IndependenceCATEGORICAL STANDARDS OF INDEPENDENCE

                In accordance with theDirector Independence Standards, the Board has determined that the nature of the following relationships with the corporation do not create a conflict of interest that would impair a director's independence.

    A-1  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

      Appendix B 



    Appendix B


    PROXY STATEMENT


          


    Appendix B

    THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
    2013 EQUITYANNUAL EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN

    Article 1.         Establishment, Purpose and Duration

                1.1    Establishment of the Plan.    The Allstate Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter, together with any successor as provided in Article 18 herein, referred to as the "Company"), hereby establishes an incentive compensation plan for employees, as set forth in this document. The Plan permits the grant of nonqualified stock options (NQSOs), incentive stock options (ISOs), stock appreciation rights (SARs), unrestricted stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, performance stock, and other awards.Purposes.

               The Plan was formerly known as "The Allstate Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan." The Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on March 13, 2001, and became effective when approved by the Company's stockholders on May 15, 2001 (the "Effective Date"). The Plan was amended by the Board of Directors on March 9, 2004. On March 14, 2006 the Plan was amended and restated effective upon approval by stockholders at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 16, 2006. The Plan was further amended and restated by the Board at meetings held on September 10, 2006, February 20, 2007, and September 15, 2008. On March 10, 2009, the Plan was amended, restated, and renamed as "The Allstate Corporation 2009 Equity Incentive Plan," effective upon approval by stockholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 19, 2009. The Plan was further amended and restated on February 22, 2011, and February 21, 2012. On February 18, 2013, the Plan was amended, restated, and renamed The Allstate Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan effective upon approval by stockholders at the Company's 2013 annual stockholders meeting, and shall thereafter remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 herein. If the Plan is not approved by stockholders at the Company's 2013 annual stockholders meeting, the Plan as in effect prior to the February 18, 2013, amendment and restatement will continue to be effective according to its terms then in effect.

                1.2    Purpose of the Plan.    The primary purpose of the Plan is to enhance the Company's ability to attract and retain highly qualified executives, link compensation with the Company's annual financial and operating goals, and provide a means by which employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries can acquire and maintain stock ownership, thereby strengthening their commitmentsuch executives with cash incentives to link the success of the Company and its Subsidiaries and their desire to remain employed by the Company and its Subsidiaries.with compensation. The Plan also is intended to attract and retain employees and to provide such employees with additional incentive and reward opportunities designed to encourage them to enhancepermit the profitable growthgranting of Awards that will constitute "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the CompanyCode and its Subsidiaries.the regulations promulgated thereunder.

                1.3    Duration of the Plan.    The Plan shall commence on the Effective Date, as described in Section 1.1 herein, and shall remain in effect subject to the right of the Board of Directors to terminate the Plan at any time pursuant to Article 15 herein, until all Stock subject to it shall have been purchased or acquired according to the Plan's provisions.

    Article 2.        DefinitionsDefinitions.

               WheneverThe following terms when used in the Plan shall, for the purposes of the Plan, have the following terms shall havemeanings:

    Article 18.  Successors6.        Miscellaneous.

    The Allstate Corporation  |  B-4


    Table of Contents

    7.        Amendment or Termination of Employment No actionthe Plan.

               The Board may at any time and from time to time, suspend, terminate, modify or failure byamend the Committee orPlan;provided,however, that no amendment that requires stockholder approval in order to maintain the Company in good faith to act, pursuant to this Section 19.5 shall subject the Committee, the Company, or anyqualification of the Company's employees, directors, or representatives to any claim, liability, or expense, and the Company shall not have any obligation to indemnify or otherwise protect any Participant from the obligation to pay any taxesQualified Performance-Based Awards as performance-based compensation pursuant to Section 409A.162(m) of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder shall be made without such stockholder approval.

    B-5  |  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents

    8.        Effective Date.

               On February 19, 2014, the Plan was amended and restated effective upon approval of the material terms of the Plan by the Company's stockholders at the Company's 2014 annual stockholders meeting and shall thereafter remain in effect as provided herein.

    The Allstate Corporation  --|  B-16B-6


    Table of Contents

      Appendix C 



    Appendix C


    PROXY STATEMENT


          


    APPENDIX C

    POLICY REGARDING PRE-APPROVAL
    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT'S SERVICES

    Purpose and Applicability

                The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independent and objective stance of our Independent Registered Public Accountant. We believe that maintaining independence, both in fact and in appearance, is a shared responsibility involving management, the Audit Committee, and the Independent Registered Public Accountant.

                The Committee recognizes that the Independent Registered Public Accountant possesses a unique knowledge of the Corporation and its subsidiaries and can provide necessary and valuable services to the Corporation in addition to the annual audit. The provision of these services is subject to three basic principles of auditor independence: (i) auditors cannot function in the role of management, (ii) auditors cannot audit their own work; and (iii) auditors cannot serve in an advocacy role for their client. Consequently, this policy sets forth guidelines and procedures to be followed by this Committee when approving services to be provided by the Independent Registered Public Accountant.


    Policy Statement

                Audit Services, Audit-Related Services, Tax Services, Other Services, and Prohibited Services are described in the attached appendix. All services to be provided by the Independent Registered Public Accountant must be approved by the Audit Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee. Neither the Audit Committee nor the Chair will approve the provision of any Prohibited Services by the Independent Registered Public Accountant.


    Procedures

                In connection with the approval by the Audit Committee of the engagement of the Independent Registered Public Accountant to provide Audit Services for the upcoming fiscal year, the Independent Registered Public Accountant will submit to the Committee for approval schedules detailing all of the specific proposed Audit, Audit-Related, Tax, and Other Services, together with estimated fees for such services that are known as of that date. Subsequent to the Audit Committee's approval of audit engagement, Corporation management may submit to the Committee or the Chair for approval schedules of additional specific proposed Audit, Audit-Related, Tax, and Other Services that management recommends be provided by the Independent Registered Public Accountant during the audit and professional engagement period. Regardless of when proposed to the Committee or the Chair, each specific service will require approval by the Committee or the Chair before commencement of the specified service. The Independent Registered Public Accountant will confirm to the Committee or the Chair that each specific proposed service is permissible under applicable regulatory requirements.

                Prior to approval of any specific Tax Service, the Independent Registered Public Accountant shall also provide to the Committee or the Chair a written description of (i) the scope of the service and the related fee structure, (ii) any side letter or other agreement between the Independent Registered Public Accountant and the Corporation or any subsidiary regarding the service, and (iii) any compensation arrangement or other agreement between the Independent Accountant and any person with respect to promoting, marketing, or recommending a transaction covered by the service.


    Delegation to Chair

                In addition to the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Audit Committee has the authority to grant approvals of services to be provided by the Independent Registered Public Accountant. The decisions of the Chair to approve services shall be reported to the Audit Committee at each of its regularly scheduled meetings.


    Review of Services

                At each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting, the Audit Committee shall review a report containing (i) a summary of any services approved by the Chair since the Committee's last regularly scheduled meeting and (ii) an updated projection for the current fiscal year, presented in a manner consistent with the proxy disclosure requirements, of the estimated annual fees to be paid to the Independent Registered Public Accountant.

    C-1  --|  The Allstate Corporation


    Table of Contents


    Appendix

    Audit Services

      1.
      Annual financial statement audit

      2.
      Review of quarterly financial statements

      3.
      Statutory audits

      4.
      Attestation report on management's assessment of internal controls over financial reporting

      5.
      Consents, comfort letters, and reviews of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission

    Audit-Related Services

      1.
      Accounting consultations relating to accounting standards, financial reporting, and disclosure issues

      2.
      Due diligence assistance pertaining to potential acquisitions, dispositions, mergers, and securities offerings

      3.
      Financial statement audits and attest services for non-consolidated entities including employee benefit and compensation plans

    Tax Services

      1.
      Domestic and international tax compliance, planning, and advice

      2.
      Expatriate tax assistance and compliance

    Other Services

                Any service that is not a Prohibited Service, Audit Service, Audit-Related Service, or Tax Service

    Prohibited Services

                The following services, as more fully described in Regulation S-X, Rule 2-01, of the Securities and Exchange Commission, are Prohibited Services; provided however, that the services described in items 1 through 5 are not Prohibited Services if it is reasonable to conclude that the results of such services will not be subject to audit procedures during an audit of the Corporation's financial statements:

      1.
      Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements

      2.
      Financial information systems design and implementation

      3.
      Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports

      4.
      Actuarial services

      5.
      Internal audit outsourcing services

      6.
      Management functions or human resources

      7.
      Broker or dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services

      8.
      Legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit

      9.
      Any other services that the PCAOB determines, by regulation, to impair independence

    The Allstate Corporation  --|  C-2


      Table of Contents

        Appendix D 



      Appendix D


      PROXY STATEMENT


            


      Appendix D

      Executive Officers EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

                  The following table lists the names and titles of our executive officers. "AIC"AIC refers to Allstate Insurance Company.

      Name
       Principal Positions and Offices Held
       
      Thomas J. Wilson Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of The Allstate Corporation and of AIC. Mr. Wilson also is a director of The Allstate Corporation.
      Donald J. BaileyPresident Emerging Businesses.
       
      Don Civgin President and Chief Executive Officer, Allstate Financial.
       
      James D. DeVries Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of AIC (Human Resources).
       
      Judith P. Greffin Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of AIC.
       
      Sanjay Gupta Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of AIC.
       
      Suren Gupta Executive Vice President, Allstate Technology and Operations of AIC (Allstate Technology & Operations).AIC.
       
      Susan L. Lees Executive Vice President, and General Counsel, and Secretary of The Allstate Corporation and of AIC (Chief Legal Officer).
      Katherine A. MabePresident, Business to Business of AIC.
       
      Samuel H. Pilch Senior Group Vice President and Controller of The Allstate Corporation and of AIC.
       
      Steven E. Shebik Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Allstate Corporation and of AIC.
       
      Steven C. Verney Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of AIC.
       
      Matthew E. Winter President, Allstate Auto, Home, and Agencies.Personal Lines of AIC.
       

      D-1  --|  The Allstate Corporation


      Table of Contents

      Appendix E
      PROXY STATEMENT


      DEFINITIONS OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

                  Measures that are not based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("non-GAAP") are defined and reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. We believe that investors' understanding of Allstate's performance is enhanced by our disclosure of the following non-GAAP measures. Our methods for calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.

      Operating income ("operating profit") is net income available to common shareholders, excluding:

        realized capital gains and losses, after-tax, except for periodic settlements and accruals on non-hedge derivative instruments, which are reported with realized capital gains and losses but included in operating income,

        valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged, after-tax,

        amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC") and deferred sales inducements ("DSI"), to the extent they resulted from the recognition of certain realized capital gains and losses or valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged, after-tax,

        business combination expenses and the amortization of purchased intangible assets, after-tax,

        gain (loss) on disposition of operations, after-tax, and

        adjustments for other significant non-recurring, infrequent or unusual items, when (a) the nature of the charge or gain is such that it is reasonably unlikely to recur within two years, or (b) there has been no similar charge or gain within the prior two years.

                  Net income available to common shareholders is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to operating income.

                  We use operating income as an important measure to evaluate our results of operations. We believe that the measure provides investors with a valuable measure of the company's ongoing performance because it reveals trends in our insurance and financial services business that may be obscured by the net effect of realized capital gains and losses, valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged, business combination expenses and the amortization of purchased intangible assets, gain (loss) on disposition of operations and adjustments for other significant non-recurring, infrequent or unusual items. Realized capital gains and losses, valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged and gain (loss) on disposition of operations may vary significantly between periods and are generally driven by business decisions and external economic developments such as capital market conditions, the timing of which is unrelated to the insurance underwriting process. Consistent with our intent to protect results or earn additional income, operating income includes periodic settlements and accruals on certain derivative instruments that are reported in realized capital gains and losses because they do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. These instruments are used for economic hedges and to replicate fixed income securities, and by including them in operating income, we are appropriately reflecting their trends in our performance and in a manner consistent with the economically hedged investments, product attributes (e.g. net investment income and interest credited to contractholder funds) or replicated investments. Business combination expenses are excluded because they are non-recurring in nature and the amortization of purchased intangible assets is excluded because it relates to the acquisition purchase price and is not indicative of our underlying insurance business results or trends. Non-recurring items are excluded because, by their nature, they are not indicative of our business or economic trends. Accordingly, operating income excludes the effect of items that tend to be highly variable from period to period and highlights the results from ongoing operations and the underlying profitability of our business. A byproduct of excluding these items to determine operating income is the transparency and understanding of their significance to net income variability and profitability while recognizing these or similar items may recur in subsequent periods. Operating income is used by management along with the other components of net income available to common shareholders to assess our performance. We use adjusted measures of operating income and operating income per diluted common share in incentive compensation. Therefore, we believe it is useful for investors to evaluate net income available to common shareholders, operating income and their components separately and in the aggregate when reviewing and evaluating our performance. We note that investors, financial analysts, financial and business media organizations and rating agencies utilize operating income results in their evaluation of our and our industry's financial performance and in their investment decisions, recommendations and communications as it represents a

      E-1  |  The Allstate Corporation


      Table of Contents

      reliable, representative and consistent measurement of the industry and the company and management's performance. We note that the price to earnings multiple commonly used by insurance investors as a forward-looking valuation technique uses operating income as the denominator. Operating income should not be considered a substitute for net income available to common shareholders and does not reflect the overall profitability of our business.

                  The following table reconciles operating income and net income available to common shareholders for the years ended December 31.

       
        
        
       Per diluted
      common share
       
      ($ in millions, except per share data)
       2013
       2012
       2013
       2012
       
        

      Operating income

       $2,670 $2,148  5.68  4.36 

      Realized capital gains and losses, after-tax

        385  216  0.82  0.44 

      Valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged, after-tax

        (16) 82  (0.03) 0.17 

      DAC and DSI amortization relating to realized capital gains and losses and valuation changes on embedded derivatives that are not hedged, after-tax

        (5) (42) (0.01) (0.09)

      DAC and DSI unlocking relating to realized capital gains and losses, after-tax

        7  4  0.01  0.01 

      Reclassification of periodic settlements and accruals on non-hedge derivative instruments, after-tax

        (7) (33) (0.01) (0.07)

      Business combination expenses and the amortization of purchased intangible assets, after-tax

        (55) (81) (0.12) (0.16)

      (Loss) gain on disposition of operations, after-tax

        (515) 12  (1.10) 0.02 

      Loss on extinguishment of debt, after-tax

        (319)   (0.68)  

      Postretirement benefits curtailment gain, after-tax

        118    0.25   
        

      Net income available to common shareholders

       $2,263 $2,306  4.81  4.68 
        

      The Allstate Corporation  |  E-2


      TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date w SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION C/O WELLS FARGO SHAREOWNER SERVICES P.O. BOX 64945 ST. PAUL, MN 55164-0945 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on May 20, 2013*19, 2014*. Have this proxy card/voting instruction formProxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on May 20, 2013*19, 2014*. Have this proxy card/voting instruction formProxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date this proxy card/voting instruction formProxy Card/Voting Instruction Form and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 for receipt no later than May 20, 2013*19, 2014*. *Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan With respect to any shares represented by this proxy card/voting instruction formProxy Card/Voting Instruction Form held in the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan, your voting instructions must be received no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 14, 2013.13, 2014. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy card/voting instruction formProxy Cards/Voting Instruction Forms and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. SHAREHOLDER MEETING REGISTRATION: To vote and/or attend the meeting, go to "shareholder meeting registration" link at www.proxyvote.com. If you do not have access to the Internet you can register by phone at 1-888-247-6053. M52516-P34767M66238-P47644 THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION The Board of Directors recommends you vote "FOR" all nominees for Director. 1. Election of Directors For Abstain Against For Nominees: ! ! ! 1a. F. Duane Ackerman ! ! ! 1b. Robert D. Beyer ! ! ! The Board of Directors recommends you vote "FOR" Proposals 2, 3 and 4. For Abstain Against For 1c. Kermit R. Crawford ! ! ! ! ! ! 1d. Jack M. Greenberg 2. Advisory vote to approve the executive compensation of the named executive officers. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1e. Herbert L. Henkel 3. Approve the 2013 EquityAnnual Executive Incentive Plan.Plan material terms. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1f. Ronald T. LeMay 4. Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Allstate's independent registered public accountant for 2013.2014. 1f. Siddharth N. Mehta ! ! ! The Board of Directors recommends you vote "AGAINST" Proposals 5, 6 and 6.7. 1g. Andrea Redmond ! ! ! ! ! ! 1h. H. John Riley, Jr. 5. Stockholder proposal on equity retention by senior executives. 1h. John W. Rowe ! ! ! ! ! ! 6. Stockholder proposal on reporting lobbying expenditures. 1i. John W. RoweJudith A. Sprieser ! ! ! ! ! ! 7. Stockholder proposal on reporting political expenditures. 1j. Mary Alice Taylor ! ! ! 1k. Thomas J. Wilson This proxy will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Delaware and applicable securities laws. 1j. Judith A. Sprieser ! ! ! 1k. Mary Alice Taylor ! ! ! 1l. Thomas J. Wilson Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

       


      With respect to any shares represented by this Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form which are votable and held in the Allstate 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Plan"), you may direct The Northern Trust Company as Trustee of the Plan to vote all such shares on the matters shown, and in the manner directed on the reverse hereof, unless to do so would be inconsistent with the Trustee's duties. If you wish to vote the Allstate shares allocated to the Plan account, you cannot do so in person. You must use this Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form or submit your voting instructions via the telephone or Internet. If you do not return your signed Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form or provide telephonic or Internet voting instructions on a timely basis for the shares allocated to the Plan account, those shares will be considered "unvoted." If you return a signed Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form but do not indicate how the shares should be voted on a matter, the shares represented by your signed Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form will be voted by the Trustee as the Board of Directors recommends. The Trustee will vote all unvoted and all unallocated shares held by the Plan as follows: ifIf the Trustee receives instructions on a timely basis for at least 50% of the votable allocated shares in the Plan, then it will vote all unvoted shares and unallocated shares in the same proportion and in the same manner as the shares for which timely instructions have been received, unless to do so would be inconsistent with the Trustee's duties. If the Trustee receives instructions for less than 50% of the votable shares, the Trustee shall vote all unvoted and unallocated shares in its sole discretion. However, the Trustee will not use its discretionary authority to vote on adjournment of the meeting in order to solicit further proxies. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting: The Allstate Corporation Notice of 20132014 Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and 20122013 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. M52517-P34767M66239-P47644 THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 21, 201320, 2014 11:00 a.m. This proxy card/voting instruction formProxy Card/Voting Instruction Form is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors You hereby authorize Susan L. Lees, Mary J. McGinn,Steven E. Shebik, and Thomas J. Wilson to vote all shares of common stock of The Allstate Corporation that you would be entitled to vote if personally present at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 21, 201320, 2014, and at any adjournments thereof. The authority conferred by this Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form shall be exercised by a majority of these persons present and acting at the meeting or, if only one of them is present, by that person. Each such person has the authority to designate a substitute to act for him or her. These persons are authorized to vote such shares on the matters shown, and in the manner directed on the reverse hereof and in their discretion on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting. If you return a signed proxy but do not indicate how the shares should be voted on a matter, the shares represented by your signed proxy will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends. You acknowledge receipt of The Allstate Corporation's Notice of 20132014 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, dated April 10, 2013,7, 2014, and its 20122013 Annual Report. You hereby revoke any instructions previously given to vote the shares represented by this Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form. Allstate and the Trustee have instructed the tabulation agent to keep your voting instructions strictly confidential. Sign on reverse side

       


      TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date w SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION ANNUAL MEETING FOR HOLDERS AS OF 3/22/1321/14 TO BE HELD ON 5/21/1320/14 Your vote is important. Thank you for voting. Read the Proxy Statement and have the voting instruction form below at hand. Please note that the telephone and Internet voting turns off at 11:59 pm ET the night before the meeting. To vote by Internet 1) Go to website www.proxyvote.com. To vote by Telephone 1) Call 1-800-454-8683. To vote by Mail 1) Check the appropriate boxes on the voting instruction form below. 2) Sign and date the voting instruction form. 3) Return the voting instruction form in the envelope provided. SHAREHOLDER MEETING REGISTRATION: To vote and/or attend the meeting, go to "shareholder meeting registration" link at www.proxyvote.com. If you do not have access to the Internet you can register by phone at 1-888-247-6053. M52548-P34666M66258-P46197 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on May 21, 2013.20, 2014. The following material ismaterials are available at www.proxyvote.com: Notice of 20132014 Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and 20122013 Annual Report The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: ! PLEASE "X" HERE ONLY IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING AND VOTE THESE SHARES IN PERSON 1. Election of Directors Abstain Against For Nominees: For Abstain Against For Nominees:Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. F. Duane Ackerman 2. Advisory vote to approve the executive compensation of the named executive officers. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. F. Duane Ackerman ! ! ! ! ! ! 3. Approve the 2013 EquityAnnual Executive Incentive Plan.Plan material terms. 1b. Robert D. Beyer 4. Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Allstate's independent registered public accountant for 2013.2014. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1c. Kermit R. Crawford ! ! ! 1d. Jack M. Greenberg ! ! ! The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST the following proposals: 1e. Herbert L. Henkel ! ! ! ! ! ! 1f. Ronald T. LeMaySiddharth N. Mehta 5. Stockholder proposal on equity retention by senior executives. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1g. Andrea Redmond 6. Stockholder proposal on reporting lobbying expenditures. ! ! ! 1h. H. John Riley, Jr. ! ! ! 1i.7. Stockholder proposal on reporting political expenditures. 1h. John W. Rowe ! ! ! 1j.1i. Judith A. Sprieser ! ! ! 1k.1j. Mary Alice Taylor ! ! ! 1l.1k. Thomas J. Wilson